Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700620

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly recognized, however, this has not been studied in cancer survivors in the United States. This study investigates if ACEs are associated with HRQOL in cancer survivors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from states that administered ACEs and Cancer Survivorship modules. Eligibility criteria included being a cancer survivor and not currently receiving cancer treatment. Primary exposure was number of ACEs (categorized as 0, 1-2, 3, or ≥ 4). Primary outcomes were self-reported measures of HRQOL including worse overall health and ≥ 14 unhealthy days (mentally or physically) per month. Mantel-Haenszel stratified analyses were performed and prevalence ratios were adjusted for age. RESULTS: Of 5,780 participants, 62.0% were female and 67.8% were ≥ 65 years. Prevalence of worse overall health was 22.5% for individuals with no ACEs compared to 30.2% for 2-3 ACEs (aPR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2, 1.5) and 38.5% for ≥ 4 ACEs (aPR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.5, 2.0). Prevalence of ≥ 14 unhealthy days was 18.1% with no ACEs compared to 21.0% for 1 ACE (aPR = 1.3, 95% CI 1, 1.3), 29.0% for 2-3 ACEs (aPR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.4, 1.8), and 44.8% for ≥ 4 ACEs (aPR = 2.2, 95% CI 2.0, 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides novel evidence of the association of multiple ACEs with higher prevalence of poor HRQOL in cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Screening for ACEs is warranted in all patients to guide targeted interventions to improve HRQOL and mitigate the impact of ACEs on HRQoL in cancer survivors.

2.
J Palliat Med ; 21(3): 328-334, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29058504

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While early involvement and integration of palliative care with oncology can positively impact quality of life and survival of patients with advanced cancer, there is a dearth of information regarding this integration in sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the rate and factors predicting specialist palliative referrals among cancer patients in Uganda. DESIGN: We examined the rate of referrals of cancer patients to palliative specialists via a chart review, while also surveying and interviewing doctors at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI) about their approaches to palliative care. SETTING: All adult patients at the UCI who died in a 20-month interval from 2014 to 2015. All UCI doctors were approached for the survey and 25 (96%) participated. Seven of these doctors were also individually interviewed. MEASUREMENTS: Number of referrals to palliative specialists and qualitative responses to questions about end-of-life care management. RESULTS: Sixty-six (11.1%) of 595 patients were referred to palliative care specialists. Patients with worse ECOG performance statuses were more likely to be referred to palliative specialists (odds ratio 2.23, p = 0.03); no other factors were predictive of a referral. Median number of days lived after referral was 5 days (interquartile range 2-13). Doctors explained the low referral rate and short life expectancy after referral by limited palliative resources and a reticence to have end-of-life management conversations with patients due to cultural taboos. CONCLUSION: Despite recognized benefits of palliative collaboration, doctors at the UCI seldom refer patients to palliative care specialists due to limited staffing, cultural barriers, and difficult interservice communication.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/mortality , Uganda
3.
J Glob Oncol ; 3(6): 711-719, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29244988

ABSTRACT

Purpose Avoiding chemotherapy during the last 30 days of life has become a goal of cancer care in the United States and Europe, yet end-of-life chemotherapy administration remains a common practice worldwide. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of and factors predicting end-of-life chemotherapy administration in Uganda. Methods Retrospective chart review and surveys and interviews of providers were performed at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI), the only comprehensive cancer center in the area, which serves a catchment area of greater than 100 million people. All adult patients at the UCI with reported cancer deaths between January 1, 2014, and August 31, 2015 were included. All UCI physicians were offered a survey, and a subset of physicians were also individually interviewed. Results Three hundred ninety-two patients (65.9%) received chemotherapy. Age less than 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; P = .004), a cancer diagnosis greater than 60 days before death (OR, 9.13; P < .001), and a presenting Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 (OR, 2.47; P = .001) were associated with the administration of chemotherapy. More than 45% of patients received chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life. No clinical factors were predictive of chemotherapy use in the last 30 days of life, although doctors reported using performance status, cancer stage, and tumor chemotherapy sensitivity to determine when to administer chemotherapy. Patient expectations and a lack of outcomes data were important nonclinical factors influencing chemotherapy administration. Conclusion Chemotherapy is administered to a high proportion of patients with terminal cancer in Uganda, raising concern about efficacy. Late presentation of cancer in Uganda complicates end-of-life chemotherapy recommendations, necessitating guidelines specific to sub-Saharan Africa.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Terminal Care/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uganda , Young Adult
4.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 22(4): 752-758, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26751003

ABSTRACT

The Lee Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) Symptom Scale has been recommended for use by the 2005 and 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conferences to capture cGVHD symptoms. Although the cGVHD Symptom Scale was previously validated, this study aims to reexamine the instrument's content validity by exploring the clarity, comprehensibility, relevance, and ease of use in a contemporary cGVHD sample, toward Food and Drug Administration (FDA) qualification of this patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instrument as a drug development tool. Attaining FDA qualification means that an instrument has been judged to be a reliable and valid measure of clinical benefit. Twenty adult patients with a median age of 58 year (range, 31 to 79 years) participated. The median duration of cGVHD was 33 months (range, 0 to 134.4 months), and current NIH severity score was mild in 1 patient, moderate in 10 patients, and severe in 9 patients, with a median of 5.5 treatments (range, 0 to 14) ever used for cGVHD. The median summary score was 23 (range, 8 to 51), and the median time to complete the scale was 2 minutes, 7 seconds (range, 1 minute, 8 seconds to 4 minutes). Symptoms of cGVHD were well captured on the Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale, although 4 additional symptoms/signs were mentioned by 15% of the participants. Participants mostly reported that item wording was clear and provided accurate definitions of specific terminologies; however, 7 participants (35%) reported finding 1 or more items in the skin domain unclear, reporting, for example, that rashes and itchy skin seemed synonymous. Two of 19 participants (10.5%) described how their answers would have changed had they been asked about their symptoms within the past month instead of within the past week, owing to recently resolved symptoms. All participants were able to accurately explain the concept of "bother" in their own words and distinguish it from symptom severity or other related symptom attributes. In summary, participants found the Lee GVHD Symptom Scale to be a comprehensive and understandable way to report their cGVHD symptom experience. Future work will focus on options for the recall period, the phrasing of skin items, and whether some very rare symptoms (eg, feeding tube, use of oxygen) should continue to be a part of the scale.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease/psychology , Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft vs Host Disease/pathology , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Research Design , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transplantation, Homologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...