A review of psychological assessment instruments for use in bariatric surgery evaluations.

Bariatric surgery is a viable treatment option for patients with extreme obesity and associated medical comorbidities; however, optimal surgical outcomes are not universal. Surgical societies, such as the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), recommend that patients undergo a presurgical psychological evaluation that includes reviewing patients' medical charts, conducting a comprehensive clinical interview, and employing some form of objective psychometric testing. Despite numerous societies recommending the inclusion of self-report assessments, only about 2/3 of clinics actively use psychological testing-some of which have limited empirical support to justify their use. This review aims to critically evaluate the psychometric properties of self-report measures when used in bariatric surgery settings and provide recommendations to help guide clinicians in selecting instruments to use in bariatric surgery evaluations. Recommended assessment batteries include use of a broadband instrument along with a narrowband eating measure. Suggestions for self-report measures to include in a presurgical psychological evaluation in bariatric surgery settings are also provided. (PsycINFO Database Record

Graze eating among bariatric surgery candidates: prevalence and psychosocial correlates.

BACKGROUND: Graze eating is defined as repetitive, unplanned eating of small amounts of food throughout the day. Little consensuses exist regarding whether graze eating, like binge eating disorder (BED), is characterized by feelings of loss of control (LOC). Furthermore, little is known about how patients who graze eat with and without LOC differ psychologically. OBJECTIVES: The present study seeks to better characterize graze eating by examining differences between graze eating with LOC (+LOC) and without LOC (-LOC) among presurgical bariatric patients. SETTING: A large, Midwestern academic medical center. METHODS: The sample consisted of 288 adult bariatric surgery candidates (mean age 45.8, standard deviation [SD] 12.57) who underwent a presurgical psychological evaluation. Graze eating, BED, and other mental health diagnoses were evaluated using a semistructured interview. Participants were also administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) and binge eating scale (BES). Data were collected using a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Among the 33% (n = 95) of the sample who reported preoperative graze eating, 32% (n = 30) also endorsed LOC. Graze eating, particularly with LOC, was associated with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnoses of anxiety disorders and BED, and multiple measures of internalizing dysfunction on the MMPI-2-RF. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery candidates who graze eat experience a greater degree of overall distress and psychopathology including anxiety and depression. The minority who experience grazing+LOC appear to have even greater risk of psychopathology. Moreover, there appears to be significant overlap with BED. Future research should explore whether these 2 maladaptive eating patterns benefit from similar treatment.

Using presurgical psychological testing to predict 1-year appointment adherence and weight loss in bariatric surgery patients: predictive validity and methodological considerations.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that presurgical psychopathology accounts for some of the variance in suboptimal weight loss outcomes among Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients, but research has been equivocal. OBJECTIVES: The present study seeks to extend the past literature by examining associations between presurgical scale scores on the broadband Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) and suboptimal weight loss and poor adherence to follow-up 1 year postoperatively after accounting for several methodologic considerations. SETTING: Cleveland Clinic Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. METHODS: The sample consisted of 498 RYGB patients, who produced a valid presurgical MMPI-2-RF protocol at program intake. The sample was primarily female (72.9%), Caucasian (64.9%), and middle-aged (mean = 46.4 years old; standard deviation [SD] = 11.6). The mean presurgical body mass index (BMI) was 47.4 kg/m(2) (SD = 8.2) and mean percent weight loss (%WL) at 1 year postoperatively was 31.18 %WL (SD = 8.44). RESULTS: As expected, scales from the Behavioral/Externalizing Dysfunction (BXD) domain of the MMPI-2-RF were associated with worse weight loss outcomes and poor adherence to follow-up, particularly after accounting for range restriction due to underreporting. Individuals producing elevated scores on these scales were at greater risk for achieving suboptimal weight loss (<50% excess weight loss) and not following up with their appointment compared with those who scored below cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are more likely to engage in undercontrolled behavior (e.g., poor impulse control), as indicated by presurgical MMPI-2-RF findings, are at greater risk for suboptimal weight loss and poor adherence to follow-up following RYGB. Objective psychological assessments should also be conducted postoperatively to ensure that intervention is administered in a timely manner. Future research in the area of presurgical psychological screening should consider the impact of underreporting and other discussed methodologic issues in predictive analyses.