Clinicians navigating moral accountability when discussing parental behaviors in the care of the child in the hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore how moral accountability is navigated when clinicians talk about parental behaviors to support the health of the hospitalized child. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of 74 conversations during daily rounds video recorded as part of a randomized controlled trial of an intervention to advance family-centered rounds in one children's hospital. Conversations involving children under the age 18 who were cared for by a pediatric hospitalist service, pulmonary service, or hematology/oncology service were recorded. We used conversation analysis to analyze sequences in which physicians engaged in talk that had implications for parent behavior. RESULTS: Two phenomena were apparent in how physicians and parents navigated moral accountability. First, physicians avoided or delayed parental agency in their references to parent behaviors. Second, parents demonstrated and clinicians reassured parental competence of parents caring for their children. CONCLUSION: Physicians appeared to be oriented toward the potential moral implications of asking about parental behavior. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Avoiding attributions of agency and moral accountability as well as providing reassurance for the parents' competence may be useful for clinicians to maintain a good relationship with the parents of children in their care in the hospital setting.

Devaluing Incarcerated Populations: Deprioritizing Incarcerated Populations for COVID-19 Vaccination.

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for increased attention to measures in place to protect the health of incarcerated populations. Correctional facilities saw massive COVID-19 outbreaks and correctional nurses have been at the forefront of efforts to control COVID-19 in correctional facilities. Before vaccines were widely available, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine developed a framework to guide equitable COVID-19 vaccine allocation. This study assessed the use of the framework by reviewing 15 state COVID-19 vaccination plans to identify how incarcerated populations were prioritized. Thirteen initial plans could be located. Ten of these plans placed incarcerated persons in Phases 1 and 2, while 1 state placed them in Phase 3. However, subsequent versions of the plans revealed that 8 states had deprioritized incarcerated populations by no longer considering them as a unique population. The framework was developed to promote equity, however, incarcerated persons were often dis-included as a high-risk population for vaccine prioritization, prolonging their risk of COVID-19. Engaging in the opportunity to influence both policy and practice, and promote the ethical consideration of incarcerated populations may help to address both the structural (prison) challenges and larger political structures that impacted vaccine availability and ability to provide the best care possible to this high-risk population.

Caring for the Rapidly Aging Incarcerated Population: The Role of Policy.

The population of incarcerated adults in the United States is aging rapidly. Incarcerated adults experience accelerated aging, the process in which exposure to incarceration speeds up biological aging. The current article highlights unique structural factors and care practices that incarcerated older adults face in correctional and community health systems. These factors and practices are often in direct opposition to age-friendly care. Opportunities exist to expand research, modify existing policies, and change current care practices. Given their expertise in health system processes, gerontological nurses in correctional and community health care systems can play a pivotal role in improving the care of this growing and vulnerable population. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(3), 7-11.].