Evaluation of the precision of the Plasmodium knowlesi growth inhibition assay for Plasmodium vivax Duffy-binding protein-based malaria vaccine development.

Recent data indicate increasing disease burden and importance of Plasmodium vivax (Pv) malaria. A robust assay will be essential for blood-stage Pv vaccine development. Results of the in vitro growth inhibition assay (GIA) with transgenic P. knowlesi (Pk) parasites expressing the Pv Duffy-binding protein region II (PvDBPII) correlate with in vivo protection in the first PvDBPII controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) trials, making the PkGIA an ideal selection tool once the precision of the assay is defined. To determine the precision in percentage of inhibition in GIA (%GIA) and in GIA50 (antibody concentration that gave 50 %GIA), ten GIAs with transgenic Pk parasites were conducted with four different anti-PvDBPII human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) at concentrations of 0.016 to 2 mg/mL, and three GIAs with eighty anti-PvDBPII human polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) at 10 mg/mL. A significant assay-to-assay variation was observed, and the analysis revealed a standard deviation (SD) of 13.1 in the mAb and 5.94 in the pAb dataset for %GIA, with a LogGIA50 SD of 0.299 (for mAbs). Moreover, the ninety-five percent confidence interval (95 %CI) for %GIA or GIA50 in repeat assays was calculated in this investigation. The error range determined in this study will help researchers to compare PkGIA results from different assays and studies appropriately, thus supporting the development of future blood-stage malaria vaccine candidates, specifically second-generation PvDBPII-based formulations.

A History of Malaria and Conflict.

It is supposed that in all armed conflicts until World War II more humans died of infectious diseases than of the actual violence. Especially malaria left a crucial imprint on wars throughout history. The disease aggravates wartime conditions, is thus responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in conflict zones, and is at the same time more commonly found in these areas. Malaria has halted many military campaigns in the past, with prominent examples ranging from antiquity through the medieval period and into the modern era. The parasitosis still continues to play an important role in the outcome of warfare and follow-up events today and is of special public health importance in areas of the Global South, where most of its endemicity and some of the most brutal conflicts of our time are located. Vice versa, wars and ensuing population movements increase malaria transmission and morbidity as well as impede control efforts. Awareness of this and the development of strategies to overcome both malaria and wars will massively improve the well-being of the population affected.

Liver Injury after Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator Intake: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Liver injury associated with selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) is an issue that has not been reported often. We report a case of a previously healthy 24-year-old male, who was referred to our hospital for severe jaundice with intense pruritus. He had previously taken the SARM Enobosarm (also known as Ostarine) for muscle-building purposes. Blood serum levels of total bilirubin exceeded 30 mg/dL with only a slight elevation of liver enzymes. Liver biopsy revealed isolated hepatocellular cholestasis (bland cholestasis) with limited inflammation or necrosis. Supportive treatment was begun in our hospital with molecular adsorbent recirculation system (MARS) albumin dialysis, as well as cholestyramine for pruritus relief. During therapy, bilirubin levels and symptoms regressed, and after five sessions of dialysis, the patient could be released from our clinic in a markedly improved clinical and laboratory condition. However, bilirubin parameters regressed slowly after this, reaching normal levels as late as six months after first intake of the compound. Exome-based genetic testing brought about no pathogenic variants for cholestatic liver disease in our patient. Nevertheless, three common heterozygous polymorphisms associated with an increased risk for intrahepatic cholestasis could be identified. Our case demonstrates that SARMs can cause severe liver injuries not prominently mentioned in safety data sheets. Therefore, these compounds constitute a potential danger to the user's health. This holds especially true when taking SARMs without supervision by a medical professional, which should consist of a thorough monitoring of liver enzyme and bilirubin levels.