New surgery and hospital-diagnosed infections in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing surgery - a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are fragile in many aspects. Therefore, in these patients, we studied post-operative complications (new abdominal surgery and serious infections after the first IBD surgery). METHODS: This is a nationwide cohort study based on Danish health registries and included patients with IBD undergoing surgery. The study population was split into ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The exposed cohort (elderly) constituted those at an age of ≥ 60 years at first IBD surgery, and the unexposed (adults) those with surgery at the age of 18-59 years. We estimated adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR) of a) new abdominal surgery within 2 years, and b) serious (hospital-diagnosed) infections within 6 and 12 months. We adjusted for several confounders including type of index surgery (laparoscopic or open). RESULTS: The aHR for a new surgery among elderly with UC and CD were 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.83) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.83-1.15), respectively. In elderly with UC, the aHRs of infections within 6 and 12 months after surgery were 1.07 (95% CI 0.81- 1.40) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.67-1.08), respectively. In the elderly with CD, the aHRs of infections within 6 and 12 months were 1.45 (95% CI 1.12-1.88) and 1.26 (95% CI 1.00-1.59), respectively. CONCLUSION: The elderly with IBD did not have an increased risk of new abdominal surgery within two years of the first surgery. Elderly with CD, but not UC, had an increased risk of serious infections within 6 months of surgery.

Mesalazine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and COVID-19: Hospitalization and Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes Based on Nationwide Data.

BACKGROUND: We assessed whether 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), as treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), was associated with an increase in hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 and adverse in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: This was a Danish nationwide register study. The study population consisted of all patients with an IBD diagnosis between March 1, 2010, and March 1, 2020, and living in Denmark on March 1, 2020. Patients with IBD treated with 5-ASA (exposed) were compared with patients not receiving 5-ASA (unexposed). RESULTS: We identified 60 242 patients with IBD; 15 635 (40.5%) with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 964 (4.5%) with Crohn's disease (CD) were exposed to 5-ASA. For patients with UC who were 5-ASA exposed, the hazard ratio of hospitalization was 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.78). In-hospital outcomes were not statistical significant from those not exposed to 5-ASA (median length of hospital stay 5.6 days vs 7.2 days), mechanical ventilation (0% vs 14%), continuous positive airway pressure (7.9% vs 9.4%), and in-hospital mortality (21.1% vs 17.2%). For patients with CD, the hazard ratio of hospitalization was 2.25 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-4.97). We found no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay (7.1 days vs 3.9 days), mechanical ventilation (0% vs 1.8%), use of continuous positive airway pressure (0% vs 1.8%), or in-hospital mortality (0% vs 9%) between exposed and unexposed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with UC, treated with 5-ASA, had no increased risk of hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 or more adverse in-hospital outcomes. In patients with CD, 5-ASA may be associated with an increased risk of hospitalization but not with more adverse in-hospital outcomes.

In this national register study, 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA)­treated ulcerative colitis patients had no increased risk of hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or more adverse in-hospital outcomes compared with patients not treated with 5-ASA. Also, 5-ASA­treated patients with Crohn's disease did not have more adverse in-hospital outcomes.

Infliximab, Immunomodulators and Treatment Failures in Paediatric and Adolescent Patients with Crohn's Disease: a Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In paediatric patients with Crohn's disease, the role of combination therapy, infliximab plus immunomodulators [thiopurine or methotrexate], is debated and data are sparse. We examined whether infliximab plus immunomodulators, compared to infliximab therapy alone, reduces the risk of treatment failure measured by intestinal surgery or switching type of anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] α agent within 24 months. DESIGN: Using Danish registries, we identified patients with Crohn's disease, aged ≤ 20 years at the time of the first infliximab treatment, and retrieved data on their co-medications. We used Cox regression models to examine surgery or switching type of anti-TNFα agent from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2015. RESULTS: We included 581 patients. The 2-year cumulative percentage of surgery was 8.5% among patients receiving combination therapy and 14.5% in those receiving infliximab alone. The adjusted 2-year hazard ratio [HR] of surgeries was 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.88) in patients receiving combination therapy, compared to patients receiving infliximab alone. When examining a switch of anti-TNFα we included 536 patients. Within 2 years, 18.3% experienced a switch among patients receiving combination therapy and 24.8% in patients treated with infliximab alone, corresponding to an adjusted HR of 0.66 [95% CI 0.45-0.97] in patients receiving combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The HR of intestinal surgeries and the risk of a switch to another anti-TNFα was reduced in paediatric and adolescent patients receiving combination therapy, compared to patients receiving only infliximab. These results suggest a benefit for infliximab therapy combined with immunomodulators, but these need to be confirmed in data with additional clinical information.

Predictors of mortality within 1 year after primary ovarian cancer surgery: a nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of mortality within 1 year after primary surgery for ovarian cancer. DESIGN: Prospective nationwide cohort study from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2012. SETTING: Evaluation of data from the Danish Gynaecology Cancer Database and the Danish Civil Registration System. PARTICIPANTS: 2654 women who underwent surgery due to a diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer. OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival and predictors of mortality within 0-180 and 181-360 days after the primary surgery. Examined predictors were age, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, residual tumour tissue after surgery, perioperative blood transfusion and calendar year of surgery. RESULTS: The overall 1-year survival was 84%. Within 0-180 days after surgery, the 3 most important predictors of mortality from the multivariable model were residual tumour tissue >2 cm versus no residual tumour (HR=4.58 (95% CI 3.20 to 6.59)), residual tumour tissue ≤2 cm versus no residual tumour (HR=2.50 (95% CI 1.63 to 3.82)) and age >64 years versus age ≤64 years (HR=2.33 (95% CI 1.69 to 3.21)). Within 181-360 days after surgery, FIGO stages III-IV versus I-II (HR=2.81 (95% CI 1.75 to 4.50)), BMI<18.5 vs 18.5-25 kg/m(2) (HR=2.08 (95% CI 1.18 to 3.66)) and residual tumour tissue >2 cm versus no residual tumour (HR=1.84 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.70)) were the 3 most important predictors. CONCLUSIONS: The most important predictors of mortality within 1 year after surgery were residual tumour tissue (0-180 days after surgery) and advanced FIGO stage (181-360 days after surgery). However, our results suggest that the surgeon should not just aim at radical surgery, but also pay special attention to comorbidity, nutritional state, age >64 years and the need for perioperative blood transfusion.