Utilization of a Clinic-Based Hand Surgery Procedure Room in the US Military Health System: A Performance Improvement Analysis of Resource Savings and Patient Satisfaction.

PURPOSE: Recent studies examining the implementation of clinic-based procedure rooms (PRs) for wide-awake hand surgery have reported cost reduction, decreased burden on hospital systems, and improved patient satisfaction. This study evaluates other resource savings, primarily time spent by patients in the hospital. METHODS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in a PR or the operating room group for prospective evaluation. Time spent in the hospital on the day of surgery, several preprocedure appointments, complications, and cost comparisons were evaluated between the two groups. Patient-reported outcomes were also evaluated with postoperative surveys assessing anxiety, pain, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Significant time savings were noted between the groups. The median time spent in the hospital on the day of surgery for the patients in the operating room group was 256 minutes versus 90 minutes for the PR group, a time savings of approximately 3 hours. Eight additional preoperative clinic visits for operating room patients were generated compared with no additional preoperative visits for PR patients. Cost savings for surgeries performed in the clinic-based procedure amounted to $232,411. No postoperative complications were observed in the clinic setting. CONCLUSIONS: Continued utilization of the clinical PR for select hand surgery procedures will reduce the cost and time burdens for procedures while maintaining satisfaction and safety. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A clinic-based PR for performing minor hand surgeries saves the patient time and ostensibly allows the operating room to be used for more complex surgeries that are not easily amenable to a wide-awake in-clinic procedure.

All-Suture Suspensory Button Has Similar Biomechanical Performance to Metal Suspensory Button for Onlay Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.

Purpose: To evaluate the maximal load at failure, cyclic displacement, and stiffness of onlay subpectoral biceps tenodesis (BT) with an intramedullary unicortical metal button (MB) versus a unicortical all-suture button (ASB). Methods: Eighteen matched paired human cadaveric proximal humeri were randomly allocated for subpectoral BT with either ASB or MB using a high-strength suture. Specimens were tested on a servohydraulic mechanical testing apparatus under cyclic load for 1,000 cycles and then loaded to failure. The clamp was then adjusted to isolate the suture-anchor point interface and loaded to failure. Maximal load to failure, displacement, and stiffness were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between groups in stiffness, displacement, or yield load. The maximal load to failure for the MB was greater than the ASB (347.6 ± 74.1N vs 266.5 ± 69.3N, P = .047). Eight specimens in each group failed by suture pull-through on the tendon. When the suture-anchor point interface was isolated, there was no significant difference in maximal load at failure (MB 586.5 ± 215.8N vs ASB 579.6 ± 255.9N, P = .957). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the MB and ASB have similar biomechanical performance when used in subpectoral BT. Although the MB showed statistically significant greater maximal load to failure, there was no difference between the MB and ASB when the suture-tendon interface was eliminated. Suture pull-through was the most common mode of failure for both implants, underscoring the importance of the suture-tendon interface. Clinical Relevance: Fixation techniques for the treatment of long head of the biceps brachii tenodesis continue to evolve. The use of an all-suture suspensory button has advantages, but it is important to understand if this implant is a biomechanically suitable alternative to a metal suspensory button.

Characterization of Cartilage Injury and Associated Treatment at the Time of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with concomitant cartilage injuries resulting in ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with cartilaginous procedures are common in the young, high-demand population. The purpose of this study was to report and characterize cartilage treatments performed at the time of index ACLR reconstruction and to determine if those treatments are associated with revision surgery (of any kind) in the 4-year follow-up. We performed a consecutive series of active duty service members in the Military Health System Data Repository with ACLR with and without concomitant cartilage procedures done at military facilities between October 2008 and September 2011. Patients were continuously enrolled with no history of knee surgeries for 2 years prior to primary ACLR. ACLR failure was defined as revision ACLR within 4 years following the primary ACLR. Of the 2,735 primary ACLRs included in the study, 5.3% (143/2,735) underwent isolated ACLR with a cartilage procedure. Of these patients, 23.07% (33/143) experienced ACLR failure within 4 years after ACLR with cartilage procedures, including 33.33% (11/33) undergoing revision ACLR. We found concomitant cartilage procedures at time of index ACLR to have the following rates of revision 35.59% (21/59) for microfracture, 14.63% (6/41) for chondroplasty, and 13.95% (6/43) for osteochondral grafts. The overall clinical failure rate of service members with ACLR plus concomitant cartilage procedure is 23.07% with minimum 4-year follow-up. Further research should be done to identify modifiable demographic and surgical factors associated with failure. This is a retrospective case-control study that reflects level of evidence III.

Patellar Stress Fracture After Suture Anchor Patellar Tendon Repair in an Active Duty Military Member: A Case Report.

CASE: A 31-year-old US service member presented with a patellar tendon tear that was repaired acutely with 2 biocomposite suture anchors. He presented more than 2 years later with a stress fracture through a suture anchor drill hole and was treated with partially threaded screw fixation. CONCLUSION: Stress fracture through a suture anchor drill hole after patellar tendon repair is a previously unreported complication. Surgeons should have a high index of suspicion and low threshold to obtain advanced imaging in cases of unexplained pain after patellar tendon repair.

Graft Choice in Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Rates of Recurrent Instability and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Autograft, Allograft, and Synthetic Options.

PURPOSE: To determine whether graft selection or patient age affects the following after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction: (1) rates of recurrent instability, (2) rates of postoperative complications (other than instability), and (3) subjective symptom improvement. METHODS: A systematic search identified studies reporting outcomes for isolated MPFL reconstruction. Rates of recurrent instability, subjective Kujala knee function scores, and complications were tabulated. Symptom improvement was defined as change in Kujala score (preoperative evaluation to final follow-up). RESULTS: Forty-five studies were included with 27 documented cases of recurrent instability among 1,504 patients (1.8%); instability rates ranged from 0% to 20.0% overall; among autograft in adults, 0% to 11.1% (1.4%, 18/1,260); among autograft in adolescents, 0% to 20% (10.0%, 8/80); among allograft, 0% (0/65 cases); and among synthetic, 0% to 3.3% (1.3%, 1/76). Among autograft choices in adults, rates of recurrent instability were low; recurrence with gracilis ranged from 0% to 11.1% (0.9%, 1/116); with semitendinosus, 0% to 6.3% (0.6%, 4/676); with quad or patellar tendon, 0% (0/65); and with adductor tendon, 5.6% to 8.3% (6.7%, 2/30). Complication rates ranged from 0% to 34.4%. All included studies reported significant improvement in Kujala scores after surgery (P < .01). There was significant heterogeneity in effect size and evidence of reporting bias among small studies, precluding reliable pooled analysis of treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: Autograft is not superior to allograft or synthetic grafts for isolated reconstruction of the MPFL, and rates of recurrent instability are generally low. Isolated MPFL reconstruction can provide significant symptom relief regardless of graft selection, although there is a bias toward reporting better than expected results among smaller studies. Pediatric patients and patients treated with adductor tendon autograft have higher recurrent instability rates. While caution should be used in making definitive recommendations secondary to the small number of allograft and synthetic studies, selection of graft type based on surgeon preference, comfort, and prior experience remains appropriate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.