Risk of Readmission and Mortality Following Hospitalization with Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure.

PURPOSE: Hypercapnic respiratory failure (HRF) is a frequent cause of hospitalization and a common comorbidity in hospitalized patients. There are few studies addressing what factors might predict poor outcomes in this patient population. The purpose of the current study was to investigate characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with HRF. METHODS: A study of patients ≥ 18 years admitted with HRF in a 1-year period. Patients with limited life expectancy related to other conditions, and those with a non-respiratory cause of HRF, were excluded. RESULTS: 202 subjects met eligibility criteria: 24% had a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, 6% obesity hypoventilation, 46% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 10% asthma. Fifteen (7%) died during the index admission. Forty-one patients (23%) were readmitted within 30 days: peripheral vascular disease [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.78, CI 1.45-15.74] and tachycardia (aOR 2.97, CI 1.22-7.26) were associated with an increased risk of readmission. Sixty-six patients (36%) died after discharge. Risk of death was increased in older patients (aOR 1.32, CI 1.13-1.54 per 5 years), those with peripheral vascular disease (aOR 12.56, CI 2.35-67.21), higher Charlson co-morbidity index (aOR 1.39, CI 1.09-1.76), use of home oxygen (aOR 4.03, CI 1.89-8.57), and those who had been readmitted (aOR 3.07, CI 1.46-6.43). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization for HRF is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Our observation that home oxygen use was associated with increased mortality suggests that oxygen use could be a risk factor for death in patients with HRF.

Use of a computerized arthroplasty registry to generate operative reports decreases transcription errors.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the clear importance of the operative report in the electronic medical record, few studies have addressed the quality. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 300 consecutive patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasties for operative report errors utilizing three different forms of documentation (standard dictation vs. templated dictation vs. a computer registry database generated operative report). The three types of reports were evaluated for errors which were classified as either major or minor. RESULTS: There were significantly more total errors in the standard dictation group compared to both the computer registry database generated (p<0.001) and the templated operative reports (p<0.001). Major errors were significantly reduced in the database generated reports compared to the templated (p<0.001) and standard dictation groups (p<0.001). There were significantly more minor errors in the standard dictation group (p<0.001) compared to the other two groups. No statistically significant differences in major errors were noted when comparing standard vs. templated operative reports. There was no difference in minor or total errors between the database generated and templated operative reports. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a computer registry database generated operative report resulted in fewer major errors versus a templated or standard dictated operative report. Further research is warranted in this area to validate these findings across subspecialties and institutions.