Eyelash trichomegaly: a systematic review of acquired and congenital aetiologies of lengthened lashes.

Long eyelashes have been popularized and many commercially available products exist to achieve eyelash growth as a desired cosmetic effect. Eyelash trichomegaly may be induced by medications, procedures, or be related to medical conditions; however, the exact mechanisms that govern eyelash growth are not well elucidated. This study aims to identify and summarize aetiologies associated with eyelash trichomegaly. We report a systematic review of 148 clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, and case reports describing all evidence-based potential aetiologies of eyelash trichomegaly obtained from the Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library through January 2021. Inclusion criteria were defined as (i) human studies involving congenital and acquired diseases in which eyelash trichomegaly is a characteristic or (ii) assessment of trichomegaly as an adverse or desired effect of a medication or procedure. Exclusion criteria included: animal studies, articles not available in English, outcomes unrelated to eyelash trichomegaly, and secondary review articles. Pharmacologic agents associated with eyelash trichomegaly included prostaglandin analogues (15-keto fluprostenol isopropyl ester, bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost), epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab, erlotinib, and panitumumab), interferon-alpha, and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and cyclosporine). Surgical procedures of the eyelid, as well as allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, HIV, ichthyosis vulgaris (IV), uveitis, and vernal keratoconjunctivitis were also associated with increased eyelash growth. Congenital disorders associated with lengthened eyelashes included Cantú syndrome, CHOPS syndrome, Coffin-Siris syndrome, congenital heart disease, Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Costello syndrome, familial trichomegaly, Floating Harbor syndrome, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, Kabuki-Makeup syndrome, KBG syndrome, Oliver-McFarlane syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, and Smith-Magenis syndrome. While the most common cause of eyelash trichomegaly is topical bimatoprost use, better understanding of pathways implicated in eyelash trichomegaly may lead to the discovery of additional medications to stimulate eyelash growth and create avenues for future therapeutic interventions.

Development of the Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™ measure for alopecia areata.

BACKGROUND: Valid patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are required to evaluate alopecia areata (AA) treatments. OBJECTIVES: To develop a content-valid and clinically meaningful PRO measure to assess AA scalp hair loss with scores comparable with the five-response-level Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA™). METHODS: A draft PRO measure was developed based on input from 10 clinical experts in AA. The PRO measure was cognitively debriefed, modified and finalized through two rounds of qualitative semistructured interviews with patients with AA who had experienced ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. Data were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Adults (round 1: n = 25; round 2: n = 15) and adolescents aged 15-17 years (round 1: n = 5) in North America participated. All patients named scalp hair loss as a key AA sign or symptom. Patients demonstrated the ability to self-report their current amount of scalp hair using percentages. In round 1 not all patients interpreted the measurement concept consistently; therefore, the PRO was modified to clarify the measurement concept to improve usability. Following modifications, patients in round 2 responded without difficulty to the PRO measure. Patients confirmed that they could use the five-level response scale to rate their scalp hair loss: no missing hair, 0%; limited, 1-20%; moderate, 21-49%; large, 50-94%; nearly all or all, 95-100%. Almost all patients deemed hair regrowth resulting in ≤ 20% scalp hair loss a treatment success. CONCLUSIONS: The Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™ is a content-valid, clinically meaningful assessment of distinct gradations of scalp hair loss for evaluating AA treatment for patients with ≥ 50% hair loss at baseline.

The Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment scale: a measure for evaluating clinically meaningful success in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Content-valid and clinically meaningful instruments are required to evaluate outcomes of therapeutic interventions in alopecia areata (AA). OBJECTIVES: To develop an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) to interpret treatment response in AA treatment studies. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted in the USA with expert dermatologists and with patients with AA who had experienced ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss. Thematic data analysis identified critical outcomes and evaluated the content validity of the new IGA. RESULTS: Expert clinicians (n = 10) judged AA treatment success by the amount of scalp-hair growth (median 80% scalp hair). Adult (n = 25) and adolescent (n = 5) patients participated. Scalp-hair loss was the most bothersome AA sign/symptom for most patients. Perceived treatment success - short of 100% scalp hair - was the presence of ~ 70-90% scalp hair (median 80%). Using additional clinician and patient insights, the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA™) was developed. This clinician-reported outcome assessment is an ordinal, static measure comprising five severity categories of scalp-hair loss. Nearly all clinicians and patients in this study agreed that, for patients with ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss, successful treatment would be hair regrowth resulting in ≤ 20% scalp-hair loss. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using the Severity of Alopecia Tool to assess the extent (0-100%) of scalp-hair loss. The AA-IGA is a robust ordinal measure providing distinct and clinically meaningful gradations of scalp-hair loss that reflects patients' and expert clinicians' perspectives and treatment expectations. What is already known about this topic? The Severity of Alopecia Tool is widely used to assess the extent of scalp-hair loss in patients with alopecia areata. Guidelines define treatment success as a 50% improvement in scalp hair, and clinical trials have used dynamic thresholds of 50% and 90%. However, there is no clinical consensus on these endpoints, and patient perspectives on treatment success are unknown. What does this study add? Through qualitative interviews with 10 expert dermatologists and 30 patients with alopecia areata who had experienced ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss, we developed the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA™) to measure five clinically meaningful gradations of alopecia areata scalp-hair loss that reflects patients' and clinicians' perspectives and expectations of treatment success in alopecia areata treatment studies. What are the clinical implications of this work? The AA-IGA is a robust ordinal measure that can inform clinical evaluation of alopecia areata treatment outcomes. The AA-IGA can be used to determine clinically meaningful treatment success for alopecia areata, with success defined by patients and clinicians as reaching ≤ 20% scalp-hair loss. Linked Comment: Blome. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:609.

Comorbid conditions in lichen planopilaris: A retrospective data analysis of 334 patients.

BACKGROUND: Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a rare, cicatricial, lymphocyte-mediated alopecia that is thought to have an autoimmune pathogenesis and possibly related to other autoimmune diseases. However, data are limited and studies that examine comorbid conditions are lacking. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prevalence of systemic comorbid conditions, nutritional deficiencies, psychological problems, and skin cancers in patients with LPP. METHODS: We identified 334 patients with LPP who were seen in the Department of Dermatology at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 2000 and 2016. Patients with LPP were compared with 78 control patients with a diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis. RESULTS: There were more female patients with LPP compared with the controls (93.1% vs. 79.5%; p < .001) but the average age did not differ (54.77 ± 12.83 vs. 52.19 ± 15.37; p = .12). Conditions positively associated with LPP were Hashimoto's thyroiditis (6.3% vs. 0%; p = .023), hypothyroidism (24.3% vs. 12.8%; p = .028), and hirsutism (11.4% vs. 1.3%; p = .006). Negatively associated conditions were allergic rhinitis (15% vs. 24.4%; p = .046), diabetes mellitus type II (11.7% vs. 21.8%; p = .019), hyperlipidemia (38.6% vs. 52.6%; p = .024), vitamin D deficiency (50% vs. 65.4%; p = .014), depression (15.6% vs. 28.9%; p = .018), and sleep problems (7.5% vs. 29.5%; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study further emphasizes that dermatologists should screen patients with LPP for autoimmune disorders that are associated with LPP and complete a full metabolic workup to avoid missing other abnormalities. The importance of atopy, autoimmune disorders, endocrine disorders, nutritional deficiencies, psychological problems, and skin cancers in patients with scarring alopecia should be better understood.