ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assessing landing kinetics during hop testing could improve return to sport decisions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) reconstruction. However, different methods for normalizing kinetic outcomes could influence the interpretation of landing kinetics and therefore the clinical recommendations. METHODS: Twenty-one females who had returned to sport following primary unilateral ACL reconstructed completed two single hops for maximum distance on each limb. Hop distance, hop height, peak impact force, and impulse were computed for each hop, and peak impact force and impulse magnitudes were assessed when 1) non-normalized 2) normalized by bodyweight, and 3) normalized by peak potential energy during the hop. FINDINGS: Along with hop distance and height, peak impact force and impulse were found to be lower on the surgical limb relative to the non-surgical limb for both non-normalized data and when normalized to bodyweight only (p < 0.001, d > 0.95). However, peak impact force and impulse were found to be higher on the surgical limb relative to the non-surgical limb when normalizing outcomes to peak potential energy (p < 0.001, d > 1.03). INTERPRETATION: Different normalization methods result in different interpretations of single hop kinetics. ACL reconstruction patients have shorter hop distances, lower hop heights, lower force magnitudes, and worse energy absorption when hopping on their surgical limb, relative to their non-surgical limb. We believe that normalizing landing kinetics using bodyweight and using peak potential energy provide different information, and as such, we suggest that future research use both methods based on the research question.
