Real-world costs of ischemic stroke by discharge status.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the acute healthcare costs of ischemic stroke during hospitalization and the quarterly all-cause healthcare costs for the first year after discharge by discharge status. METHODS: Adult patients with a hospitalization with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM: 434.xx or 436.xx) between 1 January 2006 and 31 March 2015 were identified from a large US commercial claims database. Patients were classified into three cohorts based on their discharge status from the first stroke hospitalization, i.e. dead at discharge, discharged with disability, or discharged without disability. Third-party (medical and pharmacy) and out-of-pocket costs were adjusted to 2015 USD. RESULTS: A total of 7919 patients dead at discharge, 45,695 patients discharged with disability, and 153,778 patients discharged without disability were included in this analysis. The overall average age was 59.7 years and 52.3% were male. During hospitalization, mean total costs (third-party and out-of-pocket) were $68,370 for patients dead at discharge, $73,903 for patients discharged with disability, and $24,448 for patients discharged without disability (p < .001 for each pairwise comparison); mean third-party costs were $63,605 for patients dead at discharge, $67,861 for patients discharged with disability and $19,267 for patients discharged without disability (p < .001 for each pairwise comparison). During the first year after discharge, mean total costs for patients discharged with disability vs. without disability were $46,850 vs. $30,132 (p < .001). Mean third-party costs for patients discharged with disability vs. without disability were $19,116 vs. $10,976 during the first quarter after discharge, $10,236 vs. $6926 during the second quarter, $8241 vs. $5810 during the third quarter, and $6875 vs. $5292 during the fourth quarter (p < .001 for each quarter). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated the high economic burden of ischemic stroke, especially among patients discharged with disability with the highest costs incurred during the inpatient stays.

[Is atrial fibrillation an independent marker of cardiovascular risk?]. / La fibrillation atriale est-elle un marqueur indépendant de risque cardio-vasculaire?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia and its prevalence rises with age. AF may cause stroke and heart failure but the relationship between AF and mortality is less clear. It is difficult to determine if cardiovascular events in patients with AF are attributable to the arrhythmia itself or if they are merely related to the comorbidities frequently associated with AF. Review of the literature suggests that lone AF (without structural heart disease), a rare clinical entity except in young patients, is not an independent risk factor for mortality. On the other hand, if illnesses usually associated with AF are present (hypertension, heart failure...), AF has a negative impact on outcome in terms of survival and morbidity. Current antiarrhythmic medications have not shown reduction in mortality of AF patients, but new agents and catheter ablation are promising paths to explore in order to decrease AF burden.

[Pathophysiopathology of atrial fibrillation: applications to treatment]. / Physiopathologie de la fibrillation atriale: applications à la thérapeutique.

The origin and persistence of AF result from a complex interaction between triggers, autonomic nervous system, substrate, and factors involved in atrial remodelling. The pathophysiology of AF differs from one patient to another, but recent advances have helped us to understand more about involved mechanisms and to translate this knowledge into improvements in AF therapy. An illustration is the elimination of triggers within pulmonary veins by means of catheter ablation. Dealing with structural atrial remodelling and atrial fibrosis remains still a great challenge. Solving these problems could help us to develop new approaches to AF prevention and treatment.

[Long-term evaluation of endocavitary cryoablation of nodal reentry]. / Evaluation à long terme de la cryoablation endocavitaire dans le traitement des réentrées nodales.

Radiofrequency ablation is the reference treatment of refractory nodal reentry. Cryoablation has the advantage of having more modulable effects and minimises the risk of permanent atrioventricular block (AVB). Its immediate efficacy seems comparable to that of radiofrequency ablation but the long-term results are not well known. Endocavitary cryoablation of the slow pathway was undertaken in 26 patients (18 women) with an average age of 47.7 +/- 72.8 years with re-entrant nodal tachycardia refractory to medical therapy. The primary success rate was 92% (24 out of 26). On average, 2.6 +/- 2.2 (1 to 10) cryoablations at - 70 degrees C were delivered and were preceded by 6.4 +/- 4.5 (1 to 16) cryomappings to locate the site of the slow pathway. During cryomapping, 8 episodes of AVB were observed in 6 patients (6 second or third degree), all of which were revertible on rewarming. No cases of permanent AVB were observed. An oesophageal stimulation test of inducibility was performed on the 4th day in 21 patients, 16 of which were not reinducible. During follow-up of 355 +/- 194 days, 22 of the 26 patients (85%) had no recurrence of the arrhythmia. Two of the 24 primary successes had a recurrence, in addition to the two primary failures. Two of the four recurrences occurred in a non-sustained form which was less disabilitating for the patient and the recurrences were controlled in the 4 patients by antiarrhythmic therapy. These results suggest that cryoablation may be a reliable and effective long-term treatment of re-entrant nodal tachycardias. If confirmed in larger series in terms of efficacy and safety, cryoablation could become the treatment of choice of re-entrant nodal tachycardia.