Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 11(9)2022 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36140037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance are associated with an increased length of stay and hospital costs, while they have also been linked to high morbidity and mortality rates. In 2016 and 2017, the latest point prevalence survey (PPS) of HAIs and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals highlighted an HAI prevalence of 6.5%, while Greece had a higher HAI prevalence of 10%. The aim of this PPS was to record the prevalence of HAIs and antimicrobial use in all eight public acute care hospitals in Crete, Greece during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to highlight the types of infections and antimicrobial practices that need to be prioritized for infection control initiatives. METHODS: The PPS was conducted between 30 March and 15 April 2022, according to the ECDC standardized relevant protocol (version 5.3). Statistics were extracted using the ECDC Helics.Win.Net application (software version 4.1.0). RESULTS: A total of 1188 patients were included. The overall point prevalence of patients with at least one HAI was 10.6%. The most frequent types of infections were pneumonia (34.3%), bloodstream infections (10.5%), systemic infections and urinary tract infections (10.5% and 9.1%, respectively). In 14 (12.4%) cases, the pathogen responsible for HAI was SARS-CoV-2 following onsite spread, accounting for almost 10% of all HAIs. Microorganisms were identified in 60.1% of HAIs. Antimicrobials were administered in 711 (59.8%) patients, with 1.59 antimicrobials used per patient. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HAI and antimicrobial use among hospitalized patients in Crete, Greece was similar to the national HAI prevalence in 2016 despite the enormous pressure on public hospitals due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, both HAI prevalence and antimicrobial use remain high, underlining the need to implement adequate infection control and antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

2.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(10): 1097-1103, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29778434

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In this first attempt to suggest achievable standards for improvement in hospital infection prevention and control (IPC) in Greece, we assessed main IPC structure and process indicators emphasizing hand hygiene. METHODS: Acute-care hospitals across the country participated in a cross-sectional survey by completing the World Health Organization Hand Hygiene Self-assessment Framework (HHSAF) and by providing hospital-level IPC indicators. RESULTS: Seventeen hospitals completed the survey, comprising 14% of the country's public hospitals. Median IPC staffing levels were 0.8 nurses and 0.5 doctors per 250 beds. Few hospitals implemented full multimodal IPC programs. The HHSAF indicated that appropriate hand hygiene practices and promotion strategies were in place in most hospitals, but the mean HHSAF score of 289 was lower compared with studies in Italy (mean, 332; P = .040) and the United States (mean, 373; P < .001). Presence of 1 additional IPC nurse was independently associated with increases of 53% in the HHSAF median score for training-education (P = .035) and by 38% in the lower 30th percentile HHSAF score for safety climate (P = .049). CONCLUSIONS: Surveyed hospitals are, on average, at an intermediate level in hand hygiene practice but require improvements on training-education, evaluation-feedback, and safety climate. Ensuring adequate IPC nurse staffing levels and systematically implementing multimodal IPC programs may lead to substantial improvements.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Hand Hygiene/methods , Hospital Administration , Infection Control/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Greece , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public , Humans
3.
Int J Nurs Pract ; 24(3): e12632, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29498148

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the value of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) for general ward patients and its potential use as an alarm tool for ward nurses. METHODS: A combined prospective-retrospective observational study was conducted with 153 patients in a university hospital (2013-2014). All patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from general wards. Parameters retrospectively studied were 5 MEWS values at 4 hourly intervals, up to 20 hours before ICU admission. Parameters prospectively studied were ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, and mortality after ICU discharge. RESULTS: Most frequent severe adverse events were acute respiratory failure (39.9%) and septic shock (20.3%). Modified Early Warning Score increased gradually during the last 20 hours, and most patients remained in the wards, above a cut-off point ≥7 recorded at 4 hours before admission. Significant associations between latest MEWS score and ICU mortality and ICU length of stay were found. MEWS score≥ 7 hours before admission was highly associated with increased ICU and hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Patient deterioration in general wards can result in severe adverse events. Modified Early Warning Score is a strong predictor of outcome and may be used as a monitoring tool for potentially avoidable deaths and unplanned admissions to ICU.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Intensive Care Units , Aged , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patients' Rooms , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...