ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Cosmetic advantages and minimally invasive aspects become more and more important for patients undergoing thyroidectomy. We report on our personal experience and conceptual design in dealing with approaches to the thyroid gland, which we were the first to describe. We report on ideas and experiences concerning its implementation. METHODS: Our own experiences and considerations in the process of finding an endoscopic minimally invasive access in thyroidectomy are compared in a systematic review with the available literature on minimally invasive or endoscopic thyroid surgery. We describe our failures and risk assessment. RESULTS: Our analysis of the literature on minimally invasive thyroidectomy and our own experiences lead us to the conclusion that using different hybrid technologies during the implementation of endoscopic procedures in thyroid surgery can be helpful and could improve patients' safety. A combination of transoral endoscopic and non-transoral techniques might be a useful safer, but more traumatizing alternative for implementation. Several studies show the feasibility of the transoral access in thyroid surgery. We believe that the implementation of these new procedures as routine surgery in specialized centers must be carefully considered and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The transoral access seems to be less invasive than other extracollar endoscopic accesses in thyroid surgery. For a sublingual single-access routine surgery, better instruments are needed. The vestibular access is possible with standard instruments. Using hybrid technologies for implementation should not be considered as a failure. The transoral thyroidectomy can be a safe method in the hand of experienced surgeons. We expect this hybrid technique to play a major part in further spreading endoscopic transoral thyroid surgery.
Subject(s)
Patient Safety , Thyroid Gland/surgery , Thyroidectomy/methods , Humans , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The arguments for applying minimally invasive techniques are, besides cosmetic results, reduced access trauma and less postoperative pain. In thyroid surgery, cosmetic aspects are gaining importance. Whether minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery is less painful has not been shown yet. METHOD: In this study, we analyse the outcome of 246 patients who underwent cervical endoscopic video-assisted thyroid surgery (CEViTS) regarding the surgery itself, their postoperative pain and satisfaction with the procedure. RESULTS: CEViTS is routinely performed in our hospital. In this study, no postoperative bleedings that would have made a reoperation necessary occurred. All lobectomies could be completed endoscopically. In two cases, conversions (enlargement of the 5-mm incision to 25 mm) were necessary. Transient nerve palsy was registered in three patients (1.22%). One patient (0.41%) had a permanent palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In comparison to open surgery (n = 173 patients), the 246 CEViTS patients had a significantly lower pain level (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical endoscopic video-assisted thyroid surgery (CEViTS) can be considered a safe, less traumatizing and useful minimally invasive procedure in endoscopic thyroid surgery.
