Assessment of impression material accuracy in complete-arch restorations on four implants.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: New polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) materials with enhanced properties have been developed to improve and facilitate implant impression techniques. However, studies on their accuracy are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the accuracy and precision of implant impressions made with some recently introduced materials on a simulated patient requiring an all-on-4 implant-supported prosthesis. Well-established polyether materials were also evaluated as a comparison. The variables considered were material type, consistency, splinting or not splinting techniques, and implant angulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A reference master model was made by inserting 4 implants at angles of 0, 5, and 10 degrees. Eighty impressions were made at 37 °C in wet conditions by using a standardized technique. Eight groups (n=10) were created using monophasic, single-viscosity materials (Hydrorise Implant Medium, HIM-ns; Hydrorise Implant Medium, HIM; Honigum Mono, HM; Impregum, IMP), and 2-viscosity materials (Hydrorise Implant Heavy+Light-ns, HIH+L-ns; Hydrorise Implant Heavy+Light, HIH+L; Honigum Heavy+Light, HH+L; and Permadyne and Garant [Heavy+Light, PeH+L]). Hydrorise materials were used with splinting and not splinting (ns) techniques. The reference points located on the connecting platforms of the transfer copings (TCP) were compared with the same points on the implant connecting platforms (ICP) located in the reference model. The accuracy and precision of the impressions were determined as linear 3D errors and standard deviation between each TCP-ICP couple by using an optical coordinate measuring machine (OCMM). RESULTS: PVS materials were generally better than polyether materials, with Hydrorise materials (HIM and HIH+L) showing significantly better accuracy and precision (30.9 ±14.4 µm and 28.7 ±15.5 µm, respectively) than IMP and PeH+L polyethers (44.2 ±16 µm and 43.8 ±17.6 µm, respectively; P<.001). Honigum materials were statistically similar to Hydrorise materials (P=.765). The values shown by Hydrorise nonsplinted groups (HIH+L-ns and HIM-ns) were not statistically different from those of the splinted polyether impressions (P=.386). The viscosities (monophasic or heavy+light) had no effect on accuracy, but monophasic material positively influenced precision (HIM and HIH+L, P=.001). No correlation was found between implant angulation and accuracy (multilevel analysis and Kendall rank correlation coefficient=-0.065; P=.133). CONCLUSIONS: Recently introduced materials designed for implant impressions showed significantly higher accuracy and precision; even with the unfavorable nonsplinting technique, the new materials performed similarly to, or better than, polyether materials. Although the transfer coping splinting technique generally improved the accuracy and precision of Hydrorise materials, the effect was significant only within HIH+L groups.

Effect of techniques, trays and materials on accuracy of impressions clinically made / Efeito de técnicas, moldeiras e materiais na exatidão de moldagens odontológicas

Abstract Introduction Making accurate and dimensionally stable impressions to duplicate oral conditions and tooth morphology is an essential step of prosthetic dentistry for fabricating well-fitted indirect restorations and, consequently, ensure the longevity and success of the treatment. Several authors describe pros and cons of different impression techniques, although there is no unanimity among them about the best one. Objective This study evaluated casts' accuracy made by different impression techniques, trays and materials. Material and method 10 patients were selected and 20 impressions from teeth #13 to #16 were performed using single-step (SS) and two-step techniques, made with metal stock and customized acrylic resin partial trays, vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone rubbers. Type IV gypsum was used to pour the casts. Three photographs of each patient (baseline), as their respective gypsum casts, were taken, measured in their interested buccal surface area. Comparisons of area values among experimental groups and baseline were performed. Data showed adherence to normal curve, being submitted to 3-way ANOVA/Bonferroni test (α=.05). Result Technique produced significant differences (P=0.02). SS technique was more accurate than BUR one (P=0.003; 95=1.22 to 5.98), but both resulted in similar casts to PVC, MOV and NR techniques, which were similar to each other (P>0.05). Conclusion SS technique showed the closest absolute values to baseline.

Resumo Introdução Realizar moldagens precisas e dimensionalmente estáveis que dupliquem a condição oral é um passo essencial para a confecção de restaurações indiretas de qualidade, garantindo seu sucesso e longevidade. Diversos estudos tem demonstrado os prós e contras de diferentes técnicas de moldagem, mas nenhum consenso da melhor técnica ainda foi descrito. Objetivo Este estudo avaliou a exatidão de modelos de gesso confeccionados por diferentes técnicas de moldagem, moldeiras e materiais. Material e método 10 pacientes foram selecionados e 20 moldes dos dentes #13 até #16 foram realizados utilizando técnicas simultânea (SS) e de dois passos, realizados com moldeiras parciais metálicas e individuais de resina acrílica, silicones de adição e condensação. Gesso tipo IV foi usados para os vazamentos. Três fotografias de cada paciente (baseline), assim como dos seus respectivos modelos de gesso foram realizadas e sua área foi então mensurada, na porção vestibular. Comparações de valores de área entre os grupos experimentais e o baseline foram performadas. Os dados mostraram aderência a curva normal, sendo submetidos ao teste 3-way ANOVA/Bonferroni (α=.05). Resultado As técnicas produziram diferenças significativas (P=0.02).Técnica simultânea foi mais precisa que a BUR (P=0.0003; 95=1,22 a 5.98), mas ambas resultaram em modelos similares àqueles feitos por meio das técnicas de PVC, MOV e sem NR, que foram similares entre si (P>0.05). Conclusão Técnica simultânea demonstrou valores absolutos similares àqueles demonstrados pelo baseline.

Comparison of impression techniques and double pouring by dental cast's accuracy. Preliminary clinical-lab trial

Aim: This study compared impression techniques and double pouring by means of cast's accuracy. Methods: For each patient (n=10), impressions from right maxillary canine to first molar were made with acrylic resin trays and vinyl-polysiloxane using one single-step, and four two-steps techniques: relief with poly(vinyl chloride) film; tungsten-carbide bur/scalpel blade; small movements of the tray; non-relief. Total visible buccal surface area of crowns was measured three times using photographs from patients (Baseline) and casts. Mean area values (mm2) between Baseline and casts differences were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (α=.05; 1-ß=85%). Results: No significant differences were observed for Impression Techniques (P=.525), Double Pouring (P=.281), and their interaction (P=.809). Conclusion: All impression techniques and double pouring produced casts with similar accuracy

Estudo comparativo in vitro da resistência ao desgaste entre o cimento de ionômero de vidro pó/líquido e o encapsulado / Comparative study in vitro wear resistance between powder/liquid glass ionomer cement and encapsulated

Introdução: Os cimentos de ionômero de vidro possuem limitações devido à sua baixa resistência mecânica, a qual está diretamente relacionada com a proporção pó/líquido e a sua manipulação. Com o intuito de padronizar o proporcionamento e a manipulação, surgiram os cimentos de ionômero de vidro encapsulados, os quais possuem proporção pré-estabelecida e manipulação mecânica. Objetivo: Comparar, in vitro, a resistência ao desgaste entre os cimentos de ionômero de vidro pó/líquido (Riva self cure e Riva light cure) e os encapsulados (Riva self cure e Riva light cure). Material e método: As amostras foram divididas em quatro grupos, tendo sido confeccionados 48 corpos de prova (n=12), sendo 12 para cada grupo, com as seguintes dimensões: 7 mm de diâmetro e 4 mm de espessura. O desgaste foi avaliado de acordo com a massa perdida no processo de escovação (10.000 ciclos). Os valores obtidos na diferença entre a massa inicial e a massa final foram submetidos à análise de variância ANOVA e Teste de Tamhane (p<0,05). Resultado: Segundo os resultados obtidos, todas as amostras sofreram perda de massa estatisticamente significativa e, em ordem crescente de desgaste, temos os cimentos de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina ‒ para os quais não houve diferença significativa entre o sistema pó/líquido (ΔM=11,62 mg e p=0,001) e o encapsulado (ΔM=12,96 mg e p=0,003) (p>0,05) ‒ seguidos pelo convencional pó/líquido (ΔM=20,68 mg e p=0,014) e o convencional encapsulado (ΔM=47,95 mg e p=0,002). Conclusão: Pode-se conseguir uma resistência ao desgaste semelhante e até melhor no sistema pó/líquido.

Introduction: The glass ionomer cements presents limitations because of their low mechanical strength, which is directly related to the powder / liquid proportion and handling. Aiming to standardize the proportioning and handling, first came the encapsulated glass ionomer cements, which have pre-determined ratio and mechanical manipulation. Objective: To compare the in vitro wear resistance of the encapsulated glass ionomer cements (Riva Self Cure and Riva Light Cure) and powder/liquid (Riva Self Cure and Riva Light Cure). Material and method: The samples were divided into four groups which were made 48 specimens (n=12), 12 for each group with 7 mm diameter by 4 mm thick, and the wear was evaluated according to the mass lost in the process of brushing (10,000 cycles). The obtained values on the difference of the initial and final mass were analyzed using ANOVA and Tamhane's test (p<0.05). Result: Resulting found that all groups had loss of statistically significant mass, and in ascending order of wear have the light-cured glass, which there was no statistically significant differences between the powder /liquid ionomer (ΔM=11,62mg p=0.001) and encapsulated (ΔM=12,96mg p=0.003) (p<0,05), followed by conventional self-curing (ΔM=20,68mg p=0.014) and encapsulated self-curing (ΔM=47,95mg p=0.002). Conclusion: Conclude that despite the glass ionomer cement encapsulated standardize the proportion and handling, you can get a similar resistance to wear and even better in powder /liquid.

Accuracy of Gypsum Casts after Different Impression Techniques and Double Pouring.

This study evaluated the accuracy of gypsum casts after different impression techniques and double pouring. Ten patients were selected and for each one it was obtained 5 partial putty/wash impressions with vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) material from teeth #13 to #16 with partial metal stock trays. The following techniques were performed: (1) one-step; two-step relief with: (2) PVC film; (3) slow-speed tungsten carbide bur and scalpel blade, (4) small movements of the tray and (5) without relief-negative control. The impressions were disinfected with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes and stored during 110 and 230 minutes for the first and second pouring, respectively, with type IV gypsum. Three intra-oral lateral photographs of each patient were taken using a tripod and a customized radiographic positioner. The images were imported into ImageJ software and the total area of the buccal surface from teeth #13 to #16 was measured. A 4.0% coefficient of variance was criterion for using these measurements as Baseline values. The casts were photographed and analyzed using the same standardization for the clinical images. The area (mm2) obtained from the difference between the measurements of each gypsum cast and the Baseline value of the respective patient were calculated and analyzed by repeated-measures two way-ANOVA and Mauchly's Sphericity test (α = 0.05). No significant effect was observed for Impression technique (P = 0.23), Second pouring (P = 0.99) and their interaction (P = 0.25). The impression techniques and double pouring did not influence the accuracy of the gypsum casts.

Sistema Cone Morse e utilização de pilares com plataforma switching / Morse Taper System and platform switching abutment application

Os implantes cone morse associados a pilares com plataforma switching têm proporcionado resultados promissores com relação à estabilidade dos tecidos peri-implantares. Isso se deve ao perfil cônico do componente protético, à íntima adaptação na interface implante/pilar e ao menor acúmulo de biofilme bacteriano. Para isso, deve-se levar em consideração o posicionamento infraósseo do implante. Essa configuração implante/pilar possui resistência à fratura superior em relação aos sistemas convencionais e, além disso, devido à manutenção da crista óssea e da diversidade de pilares e componentes protéticos, possibilita reabilitações orais estéticas e biocompatíveis.

Morse taper implants associated with platform switching abutments have provided promising results with respect to the stability of peri-implant tissues. This is due to the conical profile of the abutment, the intimate adaptation at the implant/abutment interface, and to the lower accumulation of bacterial biofilm. For this, it has been proposed the insertion of the implants below the crestal bone level. This implant/ abutment configuration presents higher fracture strength compared to the conventional systems and, in addition, because of the maintenance of crestal bone and the diversity of abutments and prosthetic components, provides aesthetic and biocompatible oral rehabilitations.