Genetic, clinical and imaging implications of a noncompaction phenotype population with preserved ejection fraction.

Introduction: The genotype of symptomatic left ventricular noncompaction phenotype (LVNC) subjects with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and its effect on clinical presentation are less well studied. We aimed to characterize the genetic, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and clinical background, and genotype-phenotype relationship in LVNC with preserved LVEF. Methods: We included 54 symptomatic LVNC individuals (LVEF: 65 ± 5%) whose samples were analyzed with a 174-gene next-generation sequencing panel and 54 control (C) subjects. The results were evaluated using the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Medical data suggesting a higher risk of cardiovascular complications were considered "red flags". Results: Of the LVNC population, 24% carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P) mutations; 56% carried variants of uncertain significance (VUS); and 20% were free from cardiomyopathy-related mutations. Regarding the CMR parameters, the LVNC and C groups differed significantly, while the three genetic subgroups were comparable. We found a significant relationship between red flags and genotype; furthermore, the number of red flags in a single subject differed significantly among the genetic subgroups (p = 0.002) and correlated with the genotype (r = 0.457, p = 0.01). In 6 out of 7 LVNC subjects diagnosed in childhood, P or VUS mutations were found. Discussion: The large number of P mutations and the association between red flags and genotype underline the importance of genetic-assisted risk stratification in symptomatic LVNC with preserved LVEF.

Highlights of right ventricular characteristics of left ventricular noncompaction using 3D echocardiography.

Highlights of right ventricular characteristics of left ventricular noncompaction using 3D echocardiography. The aspects of right ventricular volumes and function investigated with 3D echocardiography in a large cohort of left ventricular noncompaction morphology (LVNC) population remains unclear. The objective of our research was to study the left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular parameters using 3D echocardiography and analyze the clinical features of a LVNC population with preserved LV ejection fraction (EF > 50 %) in comparison with healthy controls (HC). We selected 41 LVNC subjects with preserved LV function (EF: 52.91 ± 3 %, male n = 26) and without any comorbidities and compared them with an age and sex-matched HC. Three dimensional endocardial contours were evaluated to determine the following LV and RV parameters: end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes, stroke volume, EF, LV global longitudinal and circumferential strain and RV septal and free wall longitudinal strain. Regarding the clinical characteristics, the family involvement had a notable proportion, accounting for 51%. The EF and strain values of the LVNC population were significantly decreased in both RV and LV compared to HC. Although the LV volumes of the LVNC group were significantly elevated, the RV volumetric parameters did not differ significantly compared to controls. We found significant correlations between LV and RV volumetric and functional parameters and linear regression models showed that LV EDV and LV ESV determined the RV volumetric values. While the alteration and relationship of the RV parameters may represent the potential of biventricular involvement, clinical characteristics of the LVNC group underlines the necessity of monitoring this population, even with preserved EF.

Different methods, different results? Threshold-based versus conventional contouring techniques in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The quantitative differences of left and right ventricular (LV, RV) parameters of using different cardiac MRI (CMR) post-processing techniques and their clinical impact are less studied. We aimed to assess the differences and their clinical impact between the conventional contouring (CC) and the threshold-based (TB) methods using 70% and 50% thresholds in different hypertrabeculated conditions. METHODS: This retrospective study included 30 dilated cardiomyopathy, 30 left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC), 30 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy patients, 30 healthy athletes and 30 healthy volunteers. All participants underwent CMR imaging on 1.5 T. Cine sequences were used to derive measures of the cardiac volumes, function, total muscle mass (TMi) and trabeculae and papillary muscle mass (TPMi) using CC and TB segmentation methods. RESULTS: Comparing the CC and the 70% and 50% threshold TB methods, the LV and RV volumes were significantly lower, the ejection fraction (EF) and the TMi were significantly higher with the TB methods. Between the two threshold setups, only TPMi was significantly higher with the 70% threshold. Regarding the clinical benefits, the LVNC was the only group in whom all the diagnostic and therapeutic decisions and risk stratification were influenced using the TB method. Diagnostic changes occurred in three-quarters of the population, and all the cardiomyopathy groups were affected regarding the decision-making about pharmaco- and device therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Using the TB method, only TPMi was significantly higher with the 70% threshold than the 50% setup, and both of them differed significantly from the CC technique, with relevant clinical impacts in all patient groups.