ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Sepsis is a common, heterogeneous, and frequently lethal condition of organ dysfunction and immune dysregulation due to infection. The causes of its heterogeneity, including the contribution of the pathogen, remain unknown. Using cecal slurry, a widely used murine model of intraperitoneal polymicrobial sepsis, as well as 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and measurement of immune markers, we performed a series of translational analyses to determine whether microbial variation in cecal slurry composition (representing intra-abdominal pathogens) mediated variation in septic response. We found wide variation in cecal slurry community composition that changed markedly over the 24-h course of infection. This variation in cecal slurry bacteria led to large variation in physiologic and inflammatory responses. Severity of inflammatory response was positively correlated with intraperitoneal enrichment with Enterobacteriaceae. Likewise, in a human cohort of patients with intra-abdominal abscesses, Enterobacteriaceae was also associated with increased inflammatory markers. Taken together, these data demonstrate that intra-abdominal Enterobacteriaceae drives inflammation in sepsis both in animal models and human subjects. More broadly, our results demonstrate that pathogen identity is a major driver of the host response in polymicrobial sepsis and should not be overlooked as a major source of phenotypic heterogeneity.
Subject(s)
Enterobacteriaceae , Sepsis , Animals , Sepsis/microbiology , Sepsis/immunology , Mice , Humans , Male , Female , Inflammation/microbiology , Disease Models, Animal , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/immunology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Cecum/microbiology , Middle AgedABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Oral microbiota associate with diseases of the mouth and serve as a source of lung microbiota. However, the role of oral microbiota in lung disease is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine associations between oral microbiota and disease severity and death in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: We analyzed 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing data of buccal swabs from 511 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the multicenter CleanUP-IPF trial. Buccal swabs were collected from usual care, and antimicrobial cohorts. Microbiome data was correlated with measures of disease severity using principal component analysis and linear regression models. Associations between the buccal microbiome and mortality were determined using Cox additive models, Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Greater buccal microbial diversity associated with lower forced vital capacity (FVC) at baseline [mean diff -3.60: 95% CI -5.92 to -1.29 percent predicted FVC per 1 unit increment]. The buccal proportion of Streptococcus correlated positively with FVC [mean diff 0.80: 95% CI 0.16-1.43 percent predicted per 10% increase] (n=490). Greater microbial diversity was associated with an increased risk of death [HR 1.73: 95% CI 1.03-2.90] while a greater proportion of Streptococcus was associated with a reduced risk of death [HR 0.85: 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99]. The Streptococcus genus was mainly comprised of Streptococcus mitis species. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing buccal microbial diversity predicts disease severity and death in IPF. The oral commensal Streptococcus mitis spp associates with preserved lung function and improved survival.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Critical Illness , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients routinely receive antibiotics with activity against anaerobic gut bacteria. However, in other disease states and animal models, gut anaerobes are protective against pneumonia, organ failure and mortality. We therefore designed a translational series of analyses and experiments to determine the effects of anti-anaerobic antibiotics on the risk of adverse clinical outcomes among critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of 3032 critically ill patients, comparing patients who did and did not receive early anti-anaerobic antibiotics. We compared intensive care unit outcomes (ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)-free survival, infection-free survival and overall survival) in all patients and changes in gut microbiota in a subcohort of 116 patients. In murine models, we studied the effects of anaerobe depletion in infectious (Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia) and noninfectious (hyperoxia) injury models. RESULTS: Early administration of anti-anaerobic antibiotics was associated with decreased VAP-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.45), infection-free survival (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.38) and overall survival (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28). Patients who received anti-anaerobic antibiotics had decreased initial gut bacterial density (p=0.00038), increased microbiome expansion during hospitalisation (p=0.011) and domination by Enterobacteriaceae spp. (p=0.045). Enterobacteriaceae were also enriched among respiratory pathogens in anti-anaerobic-treated patients (p<2.2×10-16). In murine models, treatment with anti-anaerobic antibiotics increased susceptibility to Enterobacteriaceae pneumonia (p<0.05) and increased the lethality of hyperoxia (p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, early treatment with anti-anaerobic antibiotics is associated with increased mortality. Mechanisms may include enrichment of the gut with respiratory pathogens, but increased mortality is incompletely explained by infections alone. Given consistent clinical and experimental evidence of harm, the widespread use of anti-anaerobic antibiotics should be reconsidered.