Neurophysiological profiles of responders and nonresponders to hypoglossal nerve stimulation: a single-institution study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is an effective alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnea that acts by opening the airway via selective stimulation of nerve fibers that innervate tongue muscles that protrude (genioglossus) and stiffen the tongue (transverse and vertical) while avoiding nerve fibers that innervate tongue muscles that retract the tongue (styloglossus and hyoglossus). There remains a subset of postoperative patients who fail to adequately respond to HGNS, in some cases due to mixed activation of muscles that simultaneously protrude and retract the tongue. This study aims to characterize the relationship between neurophysiological data from individual tongue muscle activation during intraoperative electromyographic recordings and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index responses to HGNS. METHODS: A single-institution review of 46 patients undergoing unilateral HGNS implantation for obstructive sleep apnea. Patients were separated into responders and nonresponders through comparison of pre and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index. Neurophysiological data included electromyographic responses of the genioglossus, styloglossus/hyoglossus, intrinsic/vertical, and hyoglossus (neck) muscles to intraoperative stimulation using unipolar (- to - and o to o) and bipolar (+ to +) settings. RESULTS: The overall treatment success rate was 61% as determined by a postoperative apnea-hypopnea index < 20 events/h with a greater than 50% AHI reduction. We observed no statistically significant relationships between treatment response and individual muscle responses. However, we did note that increasing body mass index was correlated with worse postoperative responses. CONCLUSIONS: Although we noted a significant subgroup of clinical nonresponders to HGNS postoperatively, these patients were not found to exhibit significant inclusion of tongue retractors intraoperatively on neurophysiological analysis. Further research is needed to delineate additional phenotypic factors that may contribute to HGNS treatment responses. CITATION: Wang D, Modik O, Sturm JJ, et al. Neurophysiological profiles of responders and nonresponders to hypoglossal nerve stimulation: a single-institution study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(5):1327-1333.

Evaluation of oncologic outcomes in head and neck cancer patients ≥80 years old based on adherence to NCCN guideline for postoperative adjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature characterizing outcomes in older adult patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). This study aims to describe patients from this group, their adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) adjuvant treatment guidelines, and the impact of guideline adherence on overall survival (OS). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed all patients ≥80 years old with HNC who underwent surgery with curative intent from 2008 to 2016. Adherence to NCCN guidelines was determined in blinded fashion, and quality metrics and OS were compared. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients (n = 94, 59%) underwent treatment in accordance with NCCN recommendations while 65 (41%) deviated from NCCN guidelines. The two cohorts did not demonstrate a difference in 2-year OS (62% vs 66%, P = .50). CONCLUSION: Older adult patient outcomes were not different when treatment deviated from NCCN guidelines.

Clinical Implications of Extensive Lymph Node Metastases for Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and extensive lymph node metastases have not been fully characterized. METHODS: A total of 637 patients underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) between 2002 and 2014 at the Thomas Jefferson University. Positive lymph node count (LNC) and positive lymph node ratio (LNR) were analyzed as predictors of cancer-specific outcomes, with a focus on outcomes of patients with extensive lymph node burden. RESULTS: Resected patients with regional lymph node metastases had a median survival of 17.1 months (n = 425, 70%) compared with 25.5 months (n = 185, 30%) for patients without lymph node spread (N0) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.9, p < 0.001). Overall survival decremented with increased lymph node spread, but plateaued for LNC ≥ 4 (HR 2.4 vs. N0, p < 0.001) and LNR ≥ 0.4 (HR 2.2, p < 0.001). Compared with historical cohorts with macroscopic metastatic disease, as opposed to microscopic, superior long-term survival was achieved in patients with extensive lymph node metastases (LNC ≥ 4); 24- and 36-month survivals were 25% (vs. 16%, p < 0.001) and 12% (vs. 6%, p < 0.001), respectively. Extensive lymph node burden was associated with increased baseline postoperative serum CA 19-9 (p = 0.044) and systemic recurrence (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic impact of extensive lymph node spread after resection for PDA plateaus above a specific threshold (LNC ≥ 4 or LNR ≥ 0.4), supporting the new 8th edition AJCC criteria for N2 disease. Clinically, lymph node spread above this threshold seems to correlate with occult systemic disease (elevated postoperative CA 19-9 and systemic pattern of failure).

Percutaneous gastrostomy site metastasis from head and neck tumors: A single institution case series.

Objectives: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients often require percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement due to malnutrition and dysphagia. While beneficial, PEG tube placement can cause a rare but reportable complication of metastasis of the original tumor to the gastrostomy exit site. The objectives of this case series were to present HNC patients at a single institution that developed PEG tube metastases, their subsequent treatment, and review of the literature for similar cases. Methods: We describe three HNC patients who underwent PEG tube placement and developed metastasis at their tube site. We also describe their metastatic disease treatment and compare these cases with similar cases in the literature. Results: All three cases' initial staging were node positive and all three cases had their PEG tubes placed by the "pull" method. Two patients presented with masses at their PEG site while one patient had a site mass on surveillance positron emission topography (PET) imaging. Biopsy showed the original HNC metastasized to the gastrostomy site. Two patients were treated with surgical resection while one patient was treated with palliative chemotherapy. The "pull" method has been most associated with cases of metastasis in the literature. In the literature, risk factors for metastasis include initial tumor clinical and pathological staging. Conclusion: PEG site metastasis should be suspected in patients with skin changes at the PEG site. "Pull" procedures may cause metastasis through physical contact with the primary tumor causing tumor seeding at the PEG site. Surgical resection of metastasis has been shown to be an effective treatment strategy for PEG site metastasis. In patients with higher stage cancers, tube insertion methods that avoid contact with the primary tumor should be considered. Level of Evidence: NA.