Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
ESMO Open ; 9(6): 103465, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833970

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In most patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, anti-HER2 therapies fail due to the development of acquired resistance, potentially mediated through phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling. We investigated adding taselisib, an α-selective potent oral inhibitor of PI3K, to different HER2-directed regimens in order to improve disease control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 68) with advanced HER2+ breast cancer were enrolled to this open-label, dose-escalation phase Ib study. The primary endpoint was defining the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) for the various taselisib-containing combinations. The secondary endpoint was safety. Exploratory endpoints included circulating tumor DNA analysis. The study included four cohorts: (A) taselisib + trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), (C) taselisib + trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP), (D) taselisib + TP + paclitaxel, and (E) taselisib + TP + fulvestrant. RESULTS: Following dose escalation, the taselisib MTD was defined as 4 mg once daily. Treatment was associated with significant toxicities, as 34 out of 68 patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) attributed to taselisib, the most common all-grade AEs being diarrhea, fatigue, and oral mucositis. At a median follow-up of 43.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) for the MTD-treated population in cohorts A, C, and E was 6.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-not applicable (NA)] months, 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-NA) months, and 10.6 (95% CI 8.3-NA) months, respectively. The median PFS for patients in cohort A with prior T-DM1 use was 10.4 (95% CI 2.7-NA) months. CONCLUSIONS: PIK3CA targeting with taselisib in combination with HER2-targeted therapies was associated with both promising efficacy and substantial toxicities.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Breast Neoplasms , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Aged , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Oxazoles/therapeutic use , Oxazoles/pharmacology , Oxazoles/administration & dosage , Quinazolines/therapeutic use , Quinazolines/pharmacology , Quinazolines/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/pharmacology , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Uracil/analogs & derivatives , Uracil/pharmacology , Uracil/therapeutic use , Uracil/administration & dosage , Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/therapeutic use , Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/pharmacology , Fulvestrant/pharmacology , Fulvestrant/therapeutic use , Fulvestrant/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use , Trastuzumab/pharmacology , Imidazoles , Oxazepines , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
2.
Ann Oncol ; 33(4): 384-394, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093516

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary analyses of the phase III BrighTNess trial showed addition of carboplatin with/without veliparib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates with manageable acute toxicity in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we report 4.5-year follow-up data from the trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with untreated stage II-III TNBC were randomized (2 : 1 : 1) to paclitaxel (weekly for 12 doses) plus: (i) carboplatin (every 3 weeks for four cycles) plus veliparib (twice daily); (ii) carboplatin plus veliparib placebo; or (iii) carboplatin placebo plus veliparib placebo. All patients then received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide every 2-3 weeks for four cycles. The primary endpoint was pCR. Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Since the co-primary endpoint of increased pCR with carboplatin plus veliparib with paclitaxel versus carboplatin with paclitaxel was not met, secondary analyses are descriptive. RESULTS: Of 634 patients, 316 were randomized to carboplatin plus veliparib with paclitaxel, 160 to carboplatin with paclitaxel, and 158 to paclitaxel. With median follow-up of 4.5 years, the hazard ratio for EFS for carboplatin plus veliparib with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel was 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.92, P = 0.02], but 1.12 (95% CI 0.72-1.72, P = 0.62) for carboplatin plus veliparib with paclitaxel versus carboplatin with paclitaxel. In post hoc analysis, the hazard ratio for EFS was 0.57 (95% CI 0.36-0.91, P = 0.02) for carboplatin with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel. OS did not differ significantly between treatment arms, nor did rates of myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukemia, or other secondary malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in pCR with the addition of carboplatin was associated with long-term EFS benefit with a manageable safety profile, and without increasing the risk of second malignancies, whereas adding veliparib did not impact EFS. These findings support the addition of carboplatin to weekly paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage TNBC.


Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles , Carboplatin , Cyclophosphamide , Doxorubicin , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Paclitaxel , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...