Spouses of patients treated for colon cancer: identification of key caregiver skills using the Delphi method.

PURPOSE: Spouses are often the front-line caregivers for colon cancer patients. Providing this support requires a particular set of coping skills. Our objective was to identify key skills that healthcare and medico-social sector professionals could assess in routine practice that would allow them to propose appropriate support to spouses who are accompanying colon cancer patients in their care pathway. METHODS: An online two-round Delphi study was conducted among French colon cancer patients, spouses and professionals. The content of the Delphi study was developed from a previously published qualitative study. RESULTS: In the first round of the study, 63% of the participants were professionals (n = 40), 19% spouses (n = 12) and 17% patients (n = 11). In the second round, they were respectively 55% (n = 22), 22% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 9). Twenty-seven of the 75 proposed skills were consensually identified as key skills. Nine were related to emotional and psychological well-being, six to social relations, four to organisation, five to health and three to domestic domains. The three most consensual skills (≥ 90% agreement) for spouses were (1) helping the tired patient in everyday life, (2) stimulating the patient to prevent him/her from giving up and (3) limiting one's amount of personal time to care for the patient. CONCLUSION: The study identified the key skills needed by spouses of patients being treated for colon cancer. Better awareness of these skills among professionals would enable them to offer tailored support to help patients and spouses maintain their physical and emotional well-being.

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of post-intensive care multidisciplinary consultations on mortality and the quality of life at 1 year.

PURPOSE: Critical illness is associated with long-term increased mortality and impaired quality of life (QoL). We assessed whether multidisciplinary consultations would improve outcome at 12 months (M12) after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. METHODS: We performed an open, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Eligible are patients discharged alive from ICU in 11 French hospitals between 2012 and 2018. The intervention group had a multidisciplinary face-to-face consultation involving an intensivist, a psychologist, and a social worker at ICU discharge and then at M3 and M6 (optional). The control group had standard post-ICU follow-up. A consultation was scheduled at M12 for all patients. The QoL was assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Level (Euro-QoL-5D-5L) which includes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression), each ranging from 1 to 5 (1: no, 2: slight, 3: moderate, 4: severe, and 5: extreme problems). The primary endpoint was poor clinical outcome defined as death or severe-to-extreme impairment of at least one EuroQoL-5D-5L dimension at M12. The information was collected by a blinded investigator by phone. Secondary outcomes were functional, psychological, and cognitive status at M12 consultation. RESULTS: 540 patients were included (standard, n = 272; multidisciplinary, n = 268). The risk for a poor outcome was significantly greater in the multidisciplinary group than in the standard group [adjusted odds ratio 1.49 (95% confidence interval, (1.04-2.13)]. Seventy-two (13.3%) patients died at M12 (standard, n = 32; multidisciplinary, n = 40). The functional, psychological, and cognitive scores at M12 did not statistically differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A hospital-based, face-to-face, intensivist-led multidisciplinary consultation at ICU discharge then at 3 and 6 months was associated with poor outcome 1 year after ICU.

Building an empowerment program to improve the health of patients with severe mental disorders / Exemple de coconstruction d'un programme d'empowerment en faveur de la santé des personnes vivant avec des troubles psychiques

Introduction: Risk factors and cardiovascular diseases are overrepresented in people with severe and persistent mental disorders. A person diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder is two to three times more likely to die of cardiovascular disease than the general population. Purpose of research: An empowerment program has been co-created to reduce these health inequalities. It is one part of the COPsyCAT project. The people-centered approach has been used. The participation of the patients, caregivers, and health professionals was decisive. Results: Stakeholders redefined the objectives of the program. The aim is to improve quality of life, rather than reducing cardiovascular risk. Existing tools -that have been evaluated for their usability - were selected to allow for self-directed patient orientation, so that the constraints between psychiatry and primary care could be circumvented. The program is based on the pooling of existing resources in a territory. The individual power of action and the organization of healthy offers are thus designed to reinforce each other. Conclusions: This article concretely describes the steps through to which the COPsyCAT empowerment program was designed, in co-construction by the researchers of the study, the users and user associations and healthcare professionals at based on their experiential knowledge. The feasibility of the program and the appropriation of tools in real situations will soon be evaluated. The measure of the program's effectiveness on cardiovascular risk will come in second time.

Introduction: Au sein de la population présentant des troubles psychiques sévères et persistants, on observe une surreprésentation des facteurs de risque et des pathologies cardiovasculaires. Une personne chez qui un diagnostic de schizophrénie ou de troubles bipolaires a été porté aurait deux à trois fois plus de risque de mourir d'une maladie cardiovasculaire que la population générale. But de l'étude: Dans le cadre du projet « Collaboration patient-soignant pour une meilleure prise en charge des troubles cardiovasculaires des patients souffrant de troubles psychiques au long cours ¼ (COPsyCAT), un programme d'empowerment a été coconstruit pour réduire ces inégalités de santé. La prise en compte de l'expérience et des besoins des patients, de leurs aidants et des professionnels de santé est au cœur de chacune des étapes méthodologiques suivies pour la création du programme. Résultats: Les parties prenantes ont défini le programme comme devant viser l'amélioration de la qualité de vie et non la réduction du risque cardiovasculaire. Des outils ont été sélectionnés selon leur maniabilité pour permettre l'orientation autogérée des patients, de telle sorte que les contraintes inhérentes aux cloisonnements entre psychiatrie et soins primaires soient contournées. Le programme se base sur la mutualisation des ressources existantes sur un territoire. Pouvoir d'agir individuel et construction de contexte favorable à la santé sont ainsi pensés pour se renforcer mutuellement et agir sur des leviers réformateurs. Conclusions: Cet article décrit concrètement les étapes grâce auxquelles le programme d'empowerment COPsyCAT a été conçu, en coconstruction par les chercheurs de l'étude, les usagers et associations d'usagers et les professionnels de santé à partir de leurs savoirs expérientiels. La faisabilité du programme et l'appropriation des outils en situation réelle va être prochainement évaluée. La mesure de l'efficacité du programme sur le risque cardiovasculaire viendra dans un second temps.

ICU stays that are judged to be non-beneficial: A qualitative study of the perception of nursing staff.

INTRODUCTION: Non-beneficial stays in the intensive care unit (ICU) may have repercussions for patients and their families, but can also cause suffering among the nursing staff. We aimed explore the perceptions of nursing staff in the ICU about patient stays that are deemed to be "non-beneficial" for the patient, to identify areas amenable to intervention, with a view to improving how the nursing staff perceive the patient pathway before, during and after intensive care. METHODS: Multicentre, qualitative study using individual, semi-structured interviews. All qualified nurses and nurses' aides who were full-time employees in the ICU of three participating centres were invited to participate. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using textual content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 21 interviews were performed from February 2020 to October 2021, at which point saturation was reached in the data. Average age of participants was 38.5±7.5 years, and they had an average of 10.7±7.4 years of experience working in the ICU. Four major themes emerged from the interviews, namely: (1) the work is oriented towards life-threatening emergencies, technical procedures and burdensome care; (2) a range of specific criteria and circumstances influence the decisions to admit patients to ICU; (3) there are significant organisational, physical and psychological repercussions associated with a non-beneficial stay in the ICU; (4) respondents made some proposals for improvements to the patient care pathway. CONCLUSION: Nursing staff have a similar perception to physicians regarding admission decisions and non-beneficial ICU stays. The possibility of future ICU admission needs to be anticipated, discussed systematically with patients and integrated into healthcare goals that are consistent with the patient's wishes and preferences, in multi-professional collaboration including nursing and medical staff.

Influence of socio-economic status on functional recovery after ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2: the multicentre, observational RECOVIDS study.

PURPOSE: Survivors after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk of developing respiratory sequelae and functional impairment. The healthcare crisis caused by the pandemic hit socially disadvantaged populations. We aimed to evaluate the influence of socio-economic status on respiratory sequelae after COVID-19 ARDS. METHODS: We carried out a prospective multicenter study in 30 French intensive care units (ICUs), where ARDS survivors were pre-enrolled if they fulfilled the Berlin ARDS criteria. For patients receiving high flow oxygen therapy, a flow ≥ 50 l/min and an FiO2 ≥ 50% were required for enrollment. Socio-economic deprivation was defined by an EPICES (Evaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examens de Santé - Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centres) score ≥ 30.17 and patients were included if they performed the 6-month evaluation. The primary outcome was respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge, defined by at least one of the following criteria: forced vital capacity < 80% of theoretical value, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide < 80% of theoretical value, oxygen desaturation during a 6-min walk test and fibrotic-like findings on chest computed tomography. RESULTS: Among 401 analyzable patients, 160 (40%) were socio-economically deprived and 241 (60%) non-deprived; 319 (80%) patients had respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge (81% vs 78%, deprived vs non-deprived, respectively). No significant effect of socio-economic status was identified on lung sequelae (odds ratio (OR), 1.19 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.97]), even after adjustment for age, sex, most invasive respiratory support, obesity, most severe P/F ratio (adjusted OR, 1.02 [95% CI 0.57-1.83]). CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 ARDS survivors, socio-economic status had no significant influence on respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge.

Team-family conflicts over end-of-life decisions in ICU: A survey of French physicians' beliefs.

INTRODUCTION: Conflicts between relatives and physicians may arise when decisions are being made about limiting life-sustaining therapies (LST). The aim of this study was to describe the motives for, and management of team-family conflicts surrounding LST limitation decisions in French adult ICUs. METHODS: Between June and October 2021, French ICU physicians were invited to answer a questionnaire. The development of the questionnaire followed a validated methodology with the collaboration of consultants in clinical ethics, a sociologist, a statistician and ICU clinicians. RESULTS: Among 186 physicians contacted, 160 (86%) answered all the questions. Conflicts over LST limitation decisions were mainly related to requests by relatives to continue treatments considered to be unreasonably obstinate by ICU physicians. The absence of advance directives, a lack of communication, a multitude of relatives, and religious or cultural issues were frequently mentioned as factors contributing to conflicts. Iterative interviews with relatives and proposal of psychological support were the most widely used tools in attempting to resolve conflict, while the intervention of a palliative care team, a local ethics resource or the hospital mediator were rarely solicited. In most cases, the decision was suspended at least temporarily. Possible consequences include stress and psychological exhaustion among caregivers. Improving communication and anticipation by knowing the patient's wishes would help avoid these conflicts. CONCLUSION: Team-family conflicts during LST limitation decisions are mainly related to requests from relatives to continue treatments deemed unreasonable by physicians. Reflection on the role of relatives in the decision-making process seems essential for the future.

Correction: Impact of a Postintensive Care Unit Multidisciplinary Follow-up on the Quality of Life (SUIVI-REA): Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/30496.].

Women and health professionals' perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including programmes to improve prenatal care or smoking cessation during pregnancy, and their effects demonstrated. However, ethical critiques have included paternalism and lack of informed choice. Our objective was to determine if women and healthcare professionals (HPs) shared these concerns. DESIGN: Prospective qualitative research. SETTING: We included economically disadvantaged women, as defined by health insurance data, who participated in the French NAITRE randomised trial assessing a CCT programme during prenatal follow-up to improve pregnancy outcomes. The HP worked in some maternities participating in this trial. PARTICIPANTS: 26 women, 14 who received CCT and 12 who did not, mostly unemployed (20/26), and - 7 HPs. INTERVENTIONS: We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional qualitative study among women and HPs who participated in the NAITRE Study to assess their views on CCT. The women were interviewed after childbirth. RESULTS: Women did not perceive CCT negatively. They did not mention feeling stigmatised. They described CCT as a significant source of aid for women with limited financial resources. HP described the CCT in less positive terms, for example, expressing concern about discussing cash transfer at their first medical consultation with women. Though they emphasised ethical concerns about the basis of the trial, they recognised the importance of evaluating CCT. CONCLUSIONS: In France, a high-income country where prenatal follow-up is free, HPs were concerned that the CCT programme would change their relationship with patients and wondered if it was the best use of funding. However, women who received a cash incentive said they did not feel stigmatised and indicated that these payments helped them prepare for their baby's birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02402855.

Non-beneficial admission to the intensive care unit: A nationwide survey of practices.

INTRODUCTION: In a nationwide survey of practices, we sought to define the criteria, circumstances and consequences of non-beneficial admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU), with a view to proposing measures to avoid such situations. METHODS: ICU physicians from a French research in ethics network participated in an online survey. The first part recorded age, sex, and years' experience of the participants. In the second part, there were 8 to 12 proposals on each of 4 main domains: (1) What criteria could be used to qualify an ICU stay as non-beneficial? (2) What circumstances result in the admission of a patient whose ICU stay may later be deemed non-beneficial? (3) What are the consequences of a non-beneficial stay in the ICU? (4) What measures could be implemented to avoid admissions that later come to be considered as non-beneficial? Responses were on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree". RESULTS: Among 164 physicians contacted, 154 (94%) responded. The majority cited several criteria used to qualify a stay as non-beneficial. Similarly, >80% cited several possible circumstances that could result in non-beneficial admissions, including lack of knowledge of the case and the patient's history, and failure to anticipate acute deterioration. Possible consequences of non-beneficial stays included stress and anxiety for the patient/family, misunderstandings and conflict. Discussing the utility of possible ICU admission in the framework of the patient's overall healthcare goals was hailed as a means to prevent non-beneficial admissions. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey suggest that joint discussions should take place during the patient's healthcare trajectory, before the acute need for ICU arises, with a view to limiting or avoiding ICU stays that may later come to be deemed "non-beneficial".

Psychiatric and primary care professionals' suggestions for reducing cardiovascular risks for psychiatric patients / Propositions des professionnels pour réduire le risque cardiovasculaire des patients psychiatriques

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases represent one of the major causes of mortality in France and are the main cause of excess mortality in people suffering from long-term mental disorders (LTMD), apart from causes related to suicide. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this article is to identify, from the point of view of primary care and psychiatric professionals, psychiatric users’ expectations and needs in order to help them improve their medical and paramedical management of cardiovascular risk (CVR). METHOD: This is a prospective, multi-centered qualitative study carried out in two phases: An exploratory phase, with individual interviews at the beginning of the study to enable the creation of ad hoc collective interview grids, followed by a proper qualitative study, which is in line with medical anthropology and the sociology of health systems. RESULTS: The 30 psychiatric professionals interviewed agreed on the need for better coordination with out-of-hospital care providers. Even if openness is advocated, there is a reminder of the specificities of psychiatry and the importance of taking these specificities into account in general. The 26 primary care professionals show a desire to learn more about psychiatric disorders, pathologies, and treatments in order to facilitate the management of these patients with specific needs. CONCLUSION: The cross-referencing of these results will allow to propose an appropriate intervention in order to induce convincing effects on the reduction of the CVR in people suffering from LTMD.

Introduction: Les maladies cardio-vasculaires représentent une des causes majeures de mortalité en France. Elles sont la cause principale de surmortalité des personnes souffrant de troubles psychiques au long cours (TPLC) en dehors des causes liées au suicide. But de l'étude: Cet article vise à identifier, selon le point de vue de professionnels de soins primaires et de la psychiatrie, leurs attentes et leurs besoins pour apporter aux usagers de la psychiatrie une meilleur prise en charge médicale et paramédicale du risque cardiovasculaire (RCV). Méthode: Il s'agit d'une étude qualitative prospective et multicentrique réalisée en deux temps : une phase exploratoire, par entretiens individuels en début d'étude afin de permettre la création des grilles d'entretiens collectifs ad hoc, suivie d'une étude qualitative proprement dite, qui s'inscrit dans la lignée de l'anthropologie médicale et de la sociologie des systèmes de santé. Résultats: Les 30 professionnels de la psychiatrie interrogés s'accordent sur la nécessité d'une meilleure coordination avec les soignants en extra hospitalier. Même si une ouverture est prônée, on observe un rappel des spécificités de la psychiatrie et l'importance d'une prise en compte générale de ces spécificités. Les 26 professionnels de soins primaires témoignent d'une volonté de mieux connaître les troubles, pathologies et traitements psychiatriques pour faciliter la prise en charge de ces patients à besoins spécifiques. Conclusion: Le croisement de ces résultats permettra de proposer une intervention appropriée en vue d'induire des effets probants sur la réduction du RCV chez les personnes souffrant de TPLC.

Reducing cardiovascular risk in people living with long-term psychiatric disorders / Réduire le risque cardiovasculaire chez les personnes vivant avec des troubles psychiques

INTRODUCTION: This qualitative study based on focus group study aims to identify experiences, expectations, and representations of people with long-term mental illness and their caregivers regarding cardiovascular disease and its risk factors. The aim of this work is to build a cardiovascular risk reduction program for people affected by long-term mental illness. RESULTS: Four major themes were identified in the corpus: (1) knowledge concerning physical health, (2) barriers to the implementation of better practices, (3) levers towards a healthier life and (4) expectations and needs for a better lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: This work has provided us with concrete elements for the creation of a cardiovascular risk reduction program for people living with long-term mental illness. The challenges of this program will be to adapt to the needs and expectations of people living with long-term mental illness while facilitating the role of caregivers.

Introduction: Cette étude qualitative, basée sur des Focus Groups, vise à identifier les expériences, attentes et représentations des personnes ayant des troubles psychiques au long cours (TPLC) ainsi que des aidants concernant les maladies cardiovasculaires et leurs facteurs de risque. Le but de ce travail est de construire un programme de réduction du risque cardiovasculaire (CV), destiné aux personnes concernées par ces troubles. Résultats: Quatre thèmes majeurs ont été identifiés dans le corpus : (1) les connaissances et acquis concernant la santé physique, (2) les freins à la mise en place de meilleures pratiques, (3) les leviers vers une vie plus saine et (4) les attentes et besoins pour une meilleure hygiène de vie. Conclusions: Ce travail nous a fourni des éléments concrets pour la création d'un programme de réduction du risque CV pour les personnes vivant avec un TPLC. Les enjeux de ce programme seront de s'adapter aux besoins et aux attentes des personnes vivant avec un TPLC tout en facilitant le rôle des aidants.

A qualitative study of the perceptions and experiences of healthcare providers caring for critically ill patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A PsyCOVID-ICU substudy.

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) staff have faced unprecedented levels of stress, in the context of profound upheaval of their working environment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored the perceptions of frontline ICU staff about the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and how this experience impacted their personal and professional lives. METHODS: In a qualitative study as part of the PsyCOVID-ICU project, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a random sample of nurses and nurses' aides from 5 centres participating in the main PsyCOVID study. Interviews were recorded and fully transcribed, and analysed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 18 interviews were performed from 13 August to 6 October 2020; 13 were nurses, and 5 were nurses' aides. Thematic analysis revealed three major themes, namely: (1) Managing the home life; (2) Conditions in the workplace; and (3) the meaning of their profession. CONCLUSION: In this qualitative study investigating the experiences and perceptions of healthcare workers caring for critically ill patients during the first COVID-19 wave in France, the participants reported that the crisis had profound repercussions on both their personal and professional lives. The main factors affecting the participants were a fear of contamination, and the re-organisation of working conditions, against a background of a media "infodemic".

The place of general practitioner in the management of patients with rare disease and intellectual disability: A qualitative study.

The management of patients with rare diseases (RD) presents many challenges including diagnosis, coordination of care, and orientation in the health system. For these patients, the general practitioner (GP) is not always the referring physician. The aim of this study was to determine the place of the GP in management of patients with RD. We used a qualitative study by case-study. From March to October 2020, semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone with the families of adult patients with RD and intellectual disability, and with the health professionals involved in their management. Patients were recruited through RD reference centres, patient associations or GPs. The interviews were transcribed and analysed by two independent investigators. A grounded theory-based analysis was performed. Eight case studies were conducted with 20 participants. Our results highlighted the trajectory of the patients through the development of the career of the primary informal caregiver. The caregivers developed skills required for the management of the care recipient. Within this trajectory, the GP found his place depended on the skills he could provide, their interest in the disease, the skills developed by the caregiver, and the caregiver/care recipient needs. The GP was mostly consulted for routine care and administrative procedures, but when a trusting relationship was established, they also accompanied the patient and their family by providing appropriate medical, social or psychological support. The GP will be all the more a privileged actor in the care process that he will be involved in the coordination of all other actors, professional as non-professionals.

Caregiver Representations of Therapeutic Patient Education Programmes for People with Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Study.

Background: In France, there are two main types of psychosocial educational therapies for people with mental disorders: (1) therapeutic patient education (TPE) or "training", and (2) psychoeducation. Both types of educational therapy aim to improve disease morbidity, treatment compliance and patient quality of life, but they have very different modes of application. The aim of this study was to interview mental health professionals in order to explore and identify the determinants (barriers and enablers) underlying their acceptance of therapeutic patient education (TPE) in order to facilitate the implementation of these programmes among people with severe mental illness such as schizophrenia. Methods: In this multicentre cross-sectional study, we opted for a qualitative approach based on individual semi-structured interviews with 21 mental health professionals trained in TPE, regardless of whether they had practiced it before or not. In accordance with the "Jardé" law (Decree no 2016-1537 dated 16 November 2016 published on 17 November 2016 in the Official Journal of the French Republic). No regulatory approval was required for this study. Results: The major themes that emerged from the analysis were grouped into the following conceptual framework: (1) mental health professionals (MHPs) highlight important organizational and institutional challenges that they feel are beyond their scope; (2) MHPs mention in parallel their own perceptions and representations of TPE in the context of mental health care; and (3) MHPs' representations could hide a lack of knowledge or awareness that would prevent them from appropriating TPE programmes. For each major theme, the sub-themes identified are presented. Conclusions: Although TPE is of interest in the process of patient empowerment, we found that caregivers were reluctant to appropriate this approach to care. Efforts must be made in the initial and ongoing training of MHPs to move from a paternalistic model to a patient partnership model, which is made possible by TPE. These efforts must also be firmly supported by health care facilities, and proactive governance is required for the successful implementation of TPE.

Anticipating need for intensive care in the healthcare trajectory of patients with chronic disease: A qualitative study among specialists.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the reflections and perceptions of non-ICU physicians about anticipating the need for ICU admission in case of acute decompensation in patients with chronic disease. METHODS: We performed a qualitative multicentre study using semi-structured interviews among non-ICU specialist physicians. The interview guide, developed in advance, focused on 3 questions: (1) What is your perception of ICU care? (2) How do you think advance directives can be integrated into the patient's healthcare goals? and (3) How can the possibility of a need for ICU admission be integrated into the patient's healthcare goals? Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed by thematic analysis. Interviews were performed until theoretical saturation was reached. RESULTS: In total, 16 physicians (8 women, 8 men) were interviewed. The main themes related to intensive care being viewed as a distinct specialty, dispensing very technical care, and with major human and ethical challenges, especially regarding end-of-life issues. The participants also mentioned the difficulty in anticipating an acute decompensation, and the choices that might have to be made in such situations. The timing of discussions about potential decompensation of the patient, the medical culture and the presence of advance directives are issues that arise when attempting to anticipate the question of ICU admission in the patient's healthcare goals or wishes. CONCLUSION: This study describes the perceptions that physicians treating patients with chronic disease have of intensive care, notably that it is a distinct and technical specialty that presents challenging medical and ethical situations. Our study also opens perspectives for actions that could promote a pluridisciplinary approach to anticipating acute decompensation and ICU requirements in patients with chronic disease.

Mental Health Support for Hospital Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Characteristics of the Services and Feedback from the Providers.

French authorities created mental health support services to accompany HCWs during the pandemic. We aimed to obtain feedback from staff providing these mental health support services within French hospitals to identify positive and negative features and avenues for improvement. A mixed-methods study was performed between 1 April and 30 June 2020. We contacted 77 centres to identify those providing mental health support services. We developed a questionnaire containing questions about the staff providing the service (quantitative part), with open questions to enable feedback from service providers (qualitative part). Of the 77 centres, 36 had mental health support services; 77.8% were created specifically for the epidemic. Services were staffed principally by psychologists, mainly used a telephone platform, and had a median opening time of 8 h/day. Thirty-seven professionals provided feedback, most aged 35-49 years. For 86.5%, it was their first time providing such support. Median self-reported comfort level was 8 (interquartiles 3-10), and 95% would do it again. Respondents reported (i) difficulties with work organisation, clinical situations, and lack of recognition and (ii) a desire for training. This study suggests that mental health support needs to be adapted to the needs of HCWs, both in terms of the content of the service and the timing of delivery.

Results of a Qualitative Study Aimed at Building a Programme to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in People with Severe Mental Illness.

People with severe mental illness (PSMI) have a shorter life expectancy and are more likely to have cardiovascular disease than the general population. Patients, carers, psychiatric professionals and primary care providers can all play a role in increasing PSMI physical health. The present qualitative exploratory study aimed to explore the views of these four populations as part of the multi-phase COPsyCAT project, whose objective is to build and test a cardiovascular risk prevention programme for PSMI. Overall, 107 people participated in the study's 16 focus groups, which were transcribed and analysed in a thematic analysis. With a view to building the health promotion programme, major themes identified in the corpus were translated into a list of needs as follows: communication, information, training and support. Results show that it is essential to improve communication between all the different stakeholders in mental health. The greatest challenge facing this programme will be to adapt it to the needs and expectations of PSMI while facilitating work between the various mental health stakeholders. Simple and inexpensive actions could be taken to improve the cardiovascular health of PSMI and will be experimented with during the programme's feasibility study which will start in September 2022.

Impact of a Postintensive Care Unit Multidisciplinary Follow-up on the Quality of Life (SUIVI-REA): Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients are at risk of developing a postintensive care syndrome (PICS), which is characterized by physical, psychological, and cognitive impairments and which dramatically impacts the patient's quality of life (QoL). No intervention has been shown to improve QoL. We hypothesized that a medical, psychological, and social follow-up would improve QoL by mitigating the PICS. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUIVI-REA) aims to compare a multidisciplinary follow-up with a standard postintensive care unit (ICU) follow-up. METHODS: Patients were randomized to the control or intervention arm. In the intervention arm, multidisciplinary follow-up involved medical, psychological, and social evaluation at ICU discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. In the placebo group, patients were seen only at 12 months by the multidisciplinary team. Baseline characteristics at ICU discharge were collected for all patients. The primary outcome was QoL at 1 year, assessed using the Euro Quality of Life-5 dimensions (EQ5D). Secondary outcomes were mortality, cognitive, psychological, and functional status; social and professional reintegration; and the rate of rehospitalization and outpatient consultations at 1 year. RESULTS: The study was funded by the Ministry of Health in June 2010. It was approved by the Ethics Committee on July 8, 2011. The first and last patient were randomized on December 20, 2012, and September 1, 2017, respectively. A total of 546 patients were enrolled across 11 ICUs. At present, data management is ongoing, and all parties involved in the trial remain blinded. CONCLUSIONS: The SUVI-REA multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to assess whether a post-ICU multidisciplinary follow-up improves QoL at 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01796509; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01796509. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30496.

Influence of socioeconomic status on functional recovery after ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2: a multicentre, observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Prognosis of patients with COVID-19 depends on the severity of the pulmonary affection. The most severe cases may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is associated with a risk of long-term repercussions on respiratory function and neuromuscular outcomes. The functional repercussions of severe forms of COVID-19 may have a major impact on quality of life, and impair the ability to return to work or exercise. Social inequalities in healthcare may influence prognosis, with socially vulnerable individuals more likely to develop severe forms of disease. We describe here the protocol for a prospective, multicentre study that aims to investigate the influence of social vulnerability on functional recovery in patients who were hospitalised in intensive care for ARDS caused by COVID-19. This study will also include an embedded qualitative study that aims to describe facilitators and barriers to compliance with rehabilitation, describe patients' health practices and identify social representations of health, disease and care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The "Functional Recovery From Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Due to COVID-19: Influence of Socio-Economic Status" (RECOVIDS) study is a mixed-methods, observational, multicentre cohort study performed during the routine follow-up of post-intensive care unit (ICU) functional recovery after ARDS. All patients admitted to a participating ICU for PCR-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection and who underwent chest CT scan at the initial phase AND who received respiratory support (mechanical or not) or high-flow nasal oxygen, AND had ARDS diagnosed by the Berlin criteria will be eligible. The primary outcome is the presence of lung sequelae at 6 months after ICU discharge, defined either by alterations on pulmonary function tests, oxygen desaturation during a standardised 6 min walk test or fibrosis-like pulmonary findings on chest CT. Patients will be considered to be socially disadvantaged if they have an "Evaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examen de Santé" (EPICES) score ≥30.17 at inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol and the informed consent form were approved by an independent ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Méditerranée II) on 10 July 2020 (2020-A02014-35). All patients will provide informed consent before participation. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04556513.