Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 249
Filter
1.
Chirurgie (Heidelb) ; 94(3): 230-236, 2023 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36786812

ABSTRACT

Inguinal hernia operations represent the most frequent operations overall with 300,000 interventions annually in Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH region). Despite the announced political willingness and the increasing pressure from the legislator to avoid costly inpatient treatment by carrying out as many outpatient operations as possible, outpatient treatment has so far played a subordinate role in the DACH region. The Boards of the specialist societies the German Hernia Society (DHG), the Surgical Working Group Hernia (CAH of the DHG), the Austrian Hernia Society (ÖHG) and the Swiss Working Group Hernia Surgery (SAHC) make inroads into this problem, describe the initial position and assess the current situation.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal , Humans , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Outpatients , Germany , Herniorrhaphy
2.
Hernia ; 24(4): 747-757, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31786700

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernias are repaired using either open or minimally invasive surgical techniques. For both types of surgery it has been demonstrated that a higher annual surgeon volume is associated with a lower risk of recurrence. This present study investigated the volume-outcome implications for recurrence operations, surgical complications, rate of chronic pain requiring treatment, and 30-day mortality based on the hospital volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data basis used was the routine data collected throughout the Federal Republic of Germany for persons insured by the Local General Sickness Fund "AOK" who had undergone inpatient inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2015. Complications were recorded by means of indicators. Hospitals were divided into five groups on the basis of the annual caseload volume: 1-50, 51-75, 76-100, 101-125, and ≥ 126 inguinal hernia repairs per year. The effect of the hospital volume on the indicators was assessed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: 133,449 inguinal hernia repairs were included. The incidence for recurrence operations was 0.95%, for surgical complications 4.22%, for chronic pain requiring treatment 2.87%, and for the 30-day mortality 0.28%. Low volume hospitals (1-50 and 51-75 inguinal hernia repairs per year) showed a significantly increased recurrence risk compared to high volume hospitals with ≥ 126 inguinal hernia repairs per year (odds ratio: 1.53 and 1.24). No significant correlations were found for the other results. CONCLUSIONS: The study gives a detailed picture of hospital care for inguinal hernia repair in Germany. Furthermore, it was noted that the risk of hernia recurrence decreases in line with a rising caseload of the treating hospital.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Low-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Surgeons , Treatment Outcome
3.
Chirurg ; 91(1): 51-59, 2020 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654104

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The digitalization process is currently on everyone's lips and sweeping changes in the field of public health and especially in surgery are to be expected within the next few years. Besides general issues, such as electronic health records and medical information systems, artificial intelligence, robotics and model-based surgery will decisively impact on the daily routine. In order to provide the necessary knowledge base, to point out related risks and chances and also to define fields of action for surgery, the German Society of Surgery commissioned a position paper on digitalization. A first appraisal in form of an online survey is the subject of this article. METHODS: This article is based on an online survey of the members of the German Society of Surgery and selected members of other related societies. The survey asked for the members' personal assessment concerning different aspects of the digitalization process and the respective state of knowledge as well as the impact on the field of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 296 members contributed to this survey. According to their assessment, digitalization in surgery is currently associated with terms such as electronic health records and medical information systems but they also assume a relevant influence on their own activities and on the fields of interventional medicine and surgery. A relevant need for improvement of the current state of knowledge was highlighted, not only for general aspects of digitalization but also for surgically relevant issues in particular. The vast majority of interviewed members saw digitalization more as a chance for improvement than as a risk factor. CONCLUSION: According to the views of interviewed members of the German Society of Surgery the process of digital transformation will significantly impact the field of surgery. All those involved should feel responsible to contribute to and guide this process in order to maintain the surgically inherent requirements and to protect patient safety. The position paper on digitalization can serve as a basis and should define concrete recommendations for action. In the sense of an academic approach the new possibilities should be critically evaluated with respect to suitability and should be exclusively confined to applications that are beneficial to ourselves and to our patients.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Electronic Health Records , General Surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Attitude of Health Personnel , General Surgery/trends , Humans , Risk Factors , Surgeons , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Radiologe ; 58(10): 929-934, 2018 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29992401

ABSTRACT

Intramammary manifestation of lymphoproliferative disease is rare. The radiological evaluation follows in most cases the clinical suspicion and therefore the radiologist takes an important place in diagnostics. The aim of this work is to demonstrate typical radiological patterns of this rare entity with multimodal cases and to sensitize for it. The differential diagnosis to other breast tumors, especially primary breast carcinoma, can be radiologically difficult, so the suspicious lesion must be histologically verified by biopsy.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammography , Biopsy , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans
5.
Radiologe ; 57(12): 1059-1070, 2017 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29181716

ABSTRACT

There are many different tumors and tumor-like lesions with variable biological behavior that may affect the skeletal musculature. The aim of this study was to review the different intramuscular lesions and to provide a classification based on their radiological patterns. Intramuscular lesions can present as solid, liquid, semiliquid or fat equivalent manifestations and also as diffuse muscle enlargement and muscle calcification. Additionally, lesions with mixed patterns of the aforementioned alterations can also occur. Benign and malignant muscle lesions can often manifest with identical radiological patterns, which is why a certain differentiation is often difficult. A systematic radiological description and when possible assignment with respect to etiology and dignity depending on the patient history is necessary in order to recommend a subsequent histological confirmation or to avoid unnecessary confirmation.


Subject(s)
Muscle Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Radiology
6.
Chirurg ; 87(12): 1046-1053, 2016 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492377

ABSTRACT

Esophagectomy is considered to be a high risk procedure regarding postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, in Germany, these operations are limited to hospitals fulfilling a minimum quantity. This systematic review focuses on risk and complication management regarding the impact of perioperative nutritional therapy, including the recent S3-guideline recommendations and comments of the German Working Group of Medical Societies (AWMF) which were established with contributions from the authors.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy , Nutrition Therapy/methods , Perioperative Care , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk
7.
Chirurg ; 87(10): 865-72, 2016 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27406251

ABSTRACT

The current German S3 guideline represents the recommendations for the diagnosis and therapy of squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus based on evidence from the literature and interdisciplinary expert consensus. Esophagogastroscopy with biopsy, endosonography, and spiral CT scan of the neck, thorax, and abdomen are decisive in staging and the choice of therapy. For a curative approach, surgery, especially transthoracic esophagectomy and gastric pull-up, is the most important therapeutic option, except in the case of mucosal carcinomas or cervical squamous cell carcinomas. The significance of total minimally invasive esophageal resection or a hybrid technique is still uncertain. In category cT3 or resectable cT4 tumors, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy should be performed in squamous cell carcinomas or adenocarcinomas. Alternatively, perioperative chemotherapy can be carried out in adenocarcinoma. Palliative resections should be avoided and replaced by interventional procedures for palliation.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Consensus , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Guideline Adherence , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Endosonography , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy/methods , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Palliative Care/methods
9.
Dalton Trans ; 44(6): 2819-26, 2015 Feb 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25515251

ABSTRACT

CaMg(2)AlN(3) was synthesized in a closed system by solid state reaction from binary nitrides. Structure refinements based on powder X-ray diffraction data suggested ambiguity about the occupancy of magnesium and aluminum tetrahedral sites. Solid-state (27)Al and (25)Mg NMR studies were used to adjudicate amongst possible space groups. With reference to projector augmented wave calculations of the quadrupolar coupling constants, the measured values of CQ and the numbers of crystallographically inequivalent Al and Mg sites indicate that CaMg(2)AlN(3) crystallizes in the space group P6(3)/mmc with partial occupancy of the distorted tetrahedral Al site and possibly also mixing of Mg(2+) and Al(3+) ions on opposite sites. The compound obtained by synthesis with a flux shows orange defect-related luminescence at room temperature.

10.
Z Gastroenterol ; 52(8): 807-12, 2014 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25111720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Following the introduction of the MELD score, the survival rates have worsened after liver transplantation (LTX) in Germany. Existing organ shortages, shorter survival rates after LTX, and failures in the liver allocation process provide true challenges. Facilitated by a structured questionnaire, the appropriate German liver transplantation actors were approached with regard to these challenges for the first time. The aim was to provide a balanced experts' view in an anonymous fashion thereby identifying areas for potential improvement. METHOD: Data collection was performed by a structured, standardised, anonymous survey of all LTX centres in Germany. RESULTS: We received 75 % replies of the questionnaires, 35 of 36 participants responded to more than 75 % of all questions. The following key points were highlighted. A minimum amount of LTX per centre was deemed important and monetary incentives must not exist. The ultimate goal of LTX is a prolongation of life and social as well as occupational reintegration. Quality management and transparent LTX registers are prerequisites for both adequate organ allocation and distribution of resources in order to achieve the best possible transplant outcomes. CONCLUSION: The German liver transplant experts consider transparency of organ allocation and systematic evaluation of the quality of transplant centres and the transplantation process itself to be mandatory, however, executed in a participatory way. A scoring system to facilitate the decision making process in order to predict the likelihood of satisfactory LTX outcome thereby circumventing some of the ethical and constitutional doubts would be highly appreciated.


Subject(s)
Access to Information/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Special/legislation & jurisprudence , Liver Failure/surgery , Liver Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Humans , Liver Failure/mortality , Liver Function Tests , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Patient Selection , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Analysis , Tissue Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Truth Disclosure , Waiting Lists/mortality
11.
Chirurg ; 84(4): 310-5, 2013 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23479274

ABSTRACT

The majority of recommendations in the current S3 guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric carcinoma are based on good clinical practice and lack supporting randomized studies. With the development of endoscopic resection and multimodal treatment concepts, pretherapeutic tumor staging has gained in importance. However, the accuracy of present imaging modalities is still limited with a tendency towards overstaging of locally advanced tumors. Extended lymph node dissection cannot be recommended in cases with advanced lymph node involvement. In cardiac cancer retroperitoneal lymphatic spread to the left renal vein is an early event and should thus not be classified as stage IV disease. In cases of intra-abdominal gastrectomy a pouch reconstruction should be considered in cases with a good overall prognosis. Subgroup analyses indicate a differential therapeutic effect of the established perioperative chemotherapy depending on the location of the primary tumor. There is also good evidence for an additional beneficial effect of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy/methods , Guideline Adherence , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Endosonography , Evidence-Based Medicine , Germany , Humans , Intestine, Small/surgery , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
12.
Unfallchirurg ; 115(1): 33-4, 2012 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22274602

ABSTRACT

The German S3 Guideline on Treatment of Polytrauma/Severely Injured Patients characterizes key recommendations on the current diagnostic and therapeutic approach in concomitant thoracic and abdominal trauma based on the available scientific data. The special requirements for appropriate basic treatment can be derived for rural hospitals, even though the particular grade of recommendation often is low because evidence-based studies are still lacking.The options for adequate basic treatment of thoracic and abdominal trauma in patients with multiple injuries treated in rural hospitals substantially depend on the dedication, the level of experience and training, and the willingness of the locally responsible team to cooperate.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Hospitals, Rural/standards , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Professional Competence/standards , Thoracic Injuries/surgery , Traumatology/standards , Germany , Humans
13.
Chirurg ; 83(1): 31-7, 2012 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22127381

ABSTRACT

The current S3 guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric carcinoma including those of the esophagogastric junction describe optimal clinical practice based on a high level of evidence and expert consensus from different medical disciplines. Endoscopy and performance of multiple biopsies is the standard approach to detect malignant tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Further diagnostic procedures are necessary to evaluate the tumor stage. With the exception of mucosal carcinomas, surgical therapy is the cornerstone of curative treatment in all potentially resectable stages. In locally advanced carcinomas perioperative chemotherapy should be carried out and in high-seated tumors preoperative radiochemotherapy might be an alternative option. Palliative surgical resection should be avoided in disseminated asymptomatic stages. In a palliative situation complications of the tumor should primarily be treated by interventional or conservative procedures.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagogastric Junction/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Algorithms , Biopsy , Chemoradiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy/methods , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Palliative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
14.
Pathologe ; 32 Suppl 2: 202-5, 2011 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21837400

ABSTRACT

A variety of somatic genetic and epigenetic aberrations are discussed in the multistep carcinogenesis of tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract but specific genetic changes are still unknown. Primary prevention of cancer is important and includes the control of causal endo- and exogenous factors. Screening endoscopies to detect premalignant lesions or early carcinoma cannot be recommended in the Western world. The incidence of preinvasive neoplasia, above all the high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, in Barrett's esophagus or stomach is as low as 4.0 or 0.6%, respectively. Secondary prevention of cancer after changes of the mucosa should be performed by endoscopic diagnosis and treatment performing biopsies or resection of the lesion. After histological diagnosis of a high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, complete resection of these lesions including complete ablation of Barrett's mucosa should be carried out. On the basis of an exact pathological report, close cooperation between endoscopist and surgeon seems to be necessary to find out the best individual therapy with curative intent.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/genetics , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Biopsy , Carcinoma in Situ/genetics , Carcinoma in Situ/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Early Detection of Cancer , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Precancerous Conditions/therapy , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Watchful Waiting
15.
Zentralbl Chir ; 136(4): 317-24, 2011 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21789757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The overall prognosis of gastric cancer with an overall 5-year survival of 25% is still poor despite improvements of the surgical and perioperative procedures. To improve the surgical treatment results other therapeutic options as chemo- and/or radiotherapy have been investigated for more than 20 years. METHODS: After a literature review, the results of actual trials of multimodality treatment were analysed and described. RESULTS: Adjuvant treatment was less effective compared with neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy performed in advanced tumour categories T3/4. Actual trials could show that the rate of curative (R0) resection can be augmented resulting in an increase of the overall 5-year survival rate of more than 10 %. CONCLUSION: To confirm this trend, further studies with high pathological and surgical quality control are necessary as well as a more exact definition of prediction and evaluation of the response following chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Algorithms , Biopsy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Gastrectomy , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreatectomy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Splenectomy , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate
17.
Chirurg ; 81(3): 222-30, 2010 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19760377

ABSTRACT

The surgeon is the key "prognosis factor" for colorectal cancer. For this reason quality criteria were recently established (including minimum numbers) in order to treat patients who are entitled to the best quality of care and to improve the prognosis. The aim of this study was to critically discuss the existing demands on the surgeon based on the current literature and our own results and to formulate evidence-based quality criteria for surgical clinics. After reviewing the current literature criteria were compiled, discussed and finally presented in a summarized form. These are based on current developments on the diagnostic and therapy of large intestine and colorectal carcinoma. New developments of the German Cancer Society for planning of organ centers are incorporated. The quintessence of our study is that the number of cases alone is not decisive for the success of therapy. Important are the application of the correct surgical-oncology operation procedure, adherence to standards and the training of surgeons. Following the S3 guidelines stage-oriented therapy should additionally be carried out in a structured sequence. This includes an interdisciplinary decision making on the diagnostic and therapy strategy (tumor board). The organization structure of the hospital (teams, tumor board, emergency care with intensive care unit, emergency diagnostic and options for interventional measures) can be more important than the hospital case numbers alone. These demands which have been evaluated from published data and own results are designed to raise the therapy of colorectal cancer to the best possible level of quality and to effect a further improvement in the prognosis.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Benchmarking/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Critical Pathways/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Germany , Guideline Adherence/standards , Hospital Administration/standards , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Prognosis , Reference Standards , Survival Rate
19.
Zentralbl Chir ; 134(4): 362-74, 2009 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19688686

ABSTRACT

AIM: This review comments on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer in the classical meaning--excluding adenocarcinoma of the -oesophagogastric junction. Algorithms of diagnosis and care with respect to tumour stage are presented. PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Besides oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography is necessary for the accurate diagnosis of T categories and as a selection criterion for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Computed tomography is recommended for preoperative evaluation of tumours > T1, laparoscopy has become an effective stag-ing tool in T3 and T4 tumours avoiding unnecessary laparotomies and improving the detection of small -liver and peritoneal metastases. TREATMENT: Endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection are indicated in superficial cancer confined to the mucosa with special characteristics (T1 a / no ulcer / G1, 2 / Laurén intestinal / L0 / V0 / tumour size < 2 cm). In all other cases total gastrectomy or distal subtotal gastric resection are indicated, the latter in cases of tumours located in the distal two-thirds of the stomach. Standard lymphadenectomy (LAD) is the D2 LAD without distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The Roux-en-Y oesophagojejunostomy is still the preferred type of reconstruction. An additional pouch reconstruction should be considered in -patients with favourable prognosis, this also -applies for the preservation of the duodenal passage by jejunum interposition. Extended organ resections are only indicated in cases where a R0-resection is possible. Hepatic resection for metachronous or synchronous liver metastases is rarely advised since 50 % of patients with liver metastases show concomitant peritoneal dissemination of the disease. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing gastrectomy at a high-volume centre is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and a better prognosis, however, clear thresholds for case load cannot be given. Perioperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy are based on the MAGIC and MacDonald trials. Perioperative chemotherapy should be performed in patients with T3 and T4 tumours with the aim to increase the likelihood of curative R0-resection by downsizing the tumour. Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy cannot be recommended since its benefit has so far not been proven in randomised trials. In selected patients with incomplete lymph-node dissection and questionable R0-resection postoperative chemoradiotherapy may be debated.


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Lymph Node Excision , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Biopsy , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastroscopy , Humans , Laparoscopy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Palliative Care , Perioperative Care , Peritoneal Lavage , Prognosis , Stomach/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
20.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 595-604, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15919174

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The background was to analyse the influence of hospital- and surgeon volume and of the extent of resective procedures on the quality of early and late treatment results in gastric cancer. METHODS: The literature was reviewed by searching the databases of Medline, Cancerlit, Pubmed and the Cochran register. RESULTS: The levels of evidence showed wide variations. The influence of hospital volume was more important for the outcome than the case load of the individual surgeon. The extent of surgical resection should be adapted to histology--or stage. The value of systematic lymph node dissection is still under discussion. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that the best treatment results were seen in high volume hospitals with experienced surgeons, even taking into account extended surgical procedures. Further studies are needed to define the optimal number of operations necessary to be carried out each year.


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy/methods , Gastrectomy/statistics & numerical data , Gastrectomy/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality of Health Care , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Surgery Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Surgery Department, Hospital/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic , Germany/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Node Excision/standards , Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Staging , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...