Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 105: 119-124, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30017267

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of DW MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping for the distinction of skull base chordoma from skull base chondrosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2009 to April 2014, 105 consecutive patients (chordomas (n = 70), and chondrosarcomas (n = 35) who were planned to receive proton or heavy-ion beam therapy underwent DW MR imaging on a 3.0 T. MR images were assessed by means of consensus of three experienced radiologists who were blinded to pathologic and clinical information. ADC values (mean, minimum, maximum, and normalized) of the solid tumor component were evaluated. Group means and cut-off points were established to separate skull base chordoma from skull base chondrosarcoma, and statistical significances were calculated by Student's t or Mann-Whitney-U tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The prospective study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. RESULTS: For solid tumor component, there were higher mean, minimum, maximum, and normalized ADC values in chondrosarcomas compared with those in chordomas (all p < 0.001). ROC analysis revealed areas under the curve for mean, minimum, maximum, and normalized ADC values between 0.79 and 0.93. The mean ADC value of the solid tumor components had the best AUC, with a cut-off point of 1585 × 10(-6) mm (2)/s and sensitivity and specificity of 94.3% and 98.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Skull base Chondrosarcomas generally have higher mean, minimum, maximum, and normalized ADC values than skull base chordomas, with the mean ADC value of the solid tumor component offering the highest accuracy for characterization.


Subject(s)
Chondrosarcoma/pathology , Chordoma/pathology , Skull Base Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Protons , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Skull Base/pathology
2.
Trials ; 18(1): 155, 2017 03 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28359283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Metastatic bone disease is a common and severe complication in patients with advanced cancer. Radiotherapy (RT) has long been established as an effective local treatment for metastatic bone disorder. This study assesses the effects of RT combined with muscle-training exercises in patients with unstable bone metastases of the spinal column from solid tumors. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of muscle-training exercises concomitant to RT. Secondly, quality of life, fatigue, overall and bone survival, and local control will be assessed. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, explorative intervention study with a parallel-group design to determine multidimensional effects of a course of exercises concomitant to RT on patients who have unstable metastases of the vertebral column, first under therapeutic instruction and subsequently performed by the patients themselves independently for strengthening the paravertebral muscles. On the days of radiation treatment the patients will be given four different types of exercises to ensure even isometric muscle training of all the spinal muscles. In the control group progressive muscle relaxation will be carried out parallel to RT. The patients will be randomized into two groups: differentiated muscle training or progressive muscle relaxation with 30 patients in each group. DISCUSSION: Despite the clinical experience that RT is an effective treatment for bone metastases, there is insufficient evidence for a positive effect of the combination with muscle-training exercises in patients with unstable bone metastases. Our previous DISPO-1 trial showed that adding muscle-training exercises to RT is feasible, whereas this was not proven in patients with an unstable spinal column. Although associated with several methodological and practical challenges, this randomized controlled trial is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02847754 . Registered on 27 July 2016.


Subject(s)
Back Muscles/physiopathology , Muscle Strength , Resistance Training/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Protocols , Feasibility Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Isometric Contraction , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Fatigue , Palliative Care , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Research Design , Resistance Training/adverse effects , Spinal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Trials ; 18(1): 98, 2017 03 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253920

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) of bone metastases provides an important treatment approach in palliative care treatment concepts. As a consequence of treatment, the extent of radiation-induced toxicity is a crucial feature with consequences to a patient's quality of life. In this context this study aims at reducing the extent of radiation-induced side effects and toxicity by assuming a better sparing of normal tissue with the use of intensity-modulated instead of conventionally delivered external beam radiotherapy. METHODS/DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, single-center trial for patients with spinal bone metastases, RT is performed as either image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (10x3Gy) or conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy (10x3Gy). Afterwards radiation-induced toxicity will be assessed and compared 3 and 6 months after the end of radiation. DISCUSSION: The aim of this pilot study is the evaluation of achievable benefits, with reduced radiation toxicity being the primary endpoint in the comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for patients with spinal bone metastases. Secondarily, bone re-calcification, quality of life, pain relief, spinal instability, and local control will be measured and compared between the two treatment groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02832830 . Registered on 12 July 2016.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Clinical Protocols , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Research Design , Risk Factors , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Radiat Oncol ; 11: 80, 2016 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27411832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using flattening filter free (FFF)-techniques has been increasingly applied during the last years. However, clinical studies investigating this emerging technique are still rare. Hence, we analyzed toxicity and clinical outcome of pulmonary SBRT with FFF-techniques and performed dosimetric comparison to conventional techniques using flattening filters (FF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 05/2014 and 06/2015, 56 consecutive patients with 61 pulmonary lesions were treated with SBRT in FFF-mode. Central lesions received 8 × 7.5 Gy delivered to the conformally enclosing 80 %-isodose, while peripheral lesions were treated with 3 × 15 Gy, prescribed to the 65 %-isodose. Early and late toxicity (after 6 months) as well as initial clinical outcomes were evaluated. Furthermore, [deleted] plan quality and efficiency were evaluated by analyzing conformity, beam- on and total treatment delivery times in comparison to plans with FF-dose application. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 9.3 months (range 1.5-18.0 months). Early toxicity was low with only 5 patients (8.9 %) reporting CTCAE 2° or higher side-effects. Only one patient (1.8 %) was diagnosed with radiation-induced pneumonitis CTCAE 3°, while 2 (3.6 %) patients suffered from pneumonitis CTCAE 2°. After 6 months, no toxicity greater than CTCAE 2° was reported. 1-year local progression-free survival, distant progression-free survival and overall survival were 92.8 %, 78.0 %, and 94.4 %, respectively. While plan quality was similar for FFF- and FF-plans in respect to conformity (p = 0.275), median beam-on time as well as total treatment time were significantly reduced for SBRT in FFF-mode compared to FF-mode (p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient treatment with SBRT using FFF-techniques is safe and provides promising clinical results with only modest toxicity at significantly increased dose delivery speed.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Radiosurgery , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Filtration , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...