Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 313: 76-82, 2020 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32360702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities may differently affect treatment response and cause-specific outcomes in heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF) vs. mid-range/mildly-reduced (HFmrEF) vs. reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction (EF), complicating trial design. In patients with HF, we performed a comprehensive analysis of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), atrial fibrillation (AF) chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cause-specific outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 42,583 patients from the Swedish HF registry (23% HFpEF, 21% HFmrEF, 56% HFrEF), 24% had T2DM, 51% CKD, 56% AF, and 8% all three comorbidities. HFpEF had higher prevalence of CKD and AF, HFmrEF had intermediate prevalence of AF, and prevalence of T2DM was similar across the EF spectrum. Patients with T2DM, AF and/or CKD were more likely to have also other comorbidities and more severe HF. Risk of cardiovascular (CV) events was highest in HFrEF vs. HFpEF and HFmrEF; non-CV risk was highest in HFpEF vs. HFmrEF vs. HFrEF. T2DM increased CV and non-CV events similarly but less so in HFpEF. CKD increased CV events somewhat more than non-CV events and less so in HFpEF. AF increased CV events considerably more than non-CV events and more so in HFpEF and HFmrEF. CONCLUSION: HFpEF is distinguished from HFmrEF and HFrEF by more comorbidities, non-CV events, but lower effect of T2DM and CKD on events. CV events are most frequent in HFrEF. To enrich for CV vs. non-CV events, trialists should not exclude patients with lower EF, AF and/or CKD, who report higher CV risk.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Heart Failure , Clinical Trials as Topic , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Prognosis , Stroke Volume , Sweden
2.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 21(8): 1824-1836, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30941884

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the safety of linagliptin versus other glucose-lowering medications in a multi-year monitoring programme using insurance claims data. METHODS: In two commercial US claims databases, we identified three pairwise 1:1 propensity-score (PS)-matched cohorts of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) aged ≥18 years initiating linagliptin or a comparator (other dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitors [n = 31 492 pairs], pioglitazone [n = 23 316 pairs], or second-generation sulphonylureas [n = 19 731 pairs]) between May 2011 and December 2015. The primary endpoint was the risk of a composite cardiovascular (CV) outcome (hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, or coronary revascularization). We estimated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), controlling for >100 baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced after PS-matching. The mean age was 55 years and mean follow-up was 0.8 years. Linagliptin conferred a similar risk of the composite CV outcome compared to other DPP-4 inhibitors (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79-1.05) and pioglitazone (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84-1.15), and showed a reduced risk of CV outcomes compared to second-generation sulphonylureas (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64--0.92). Key findings were signalled at the first interim analysis in June 2013 and solidified during ongoing monitoring until 2015. CONCLUSION: Analyses from a large monitoring programme in routine care of patients with T2D, showed that linagliptin had similar CV safety compared to other DPP-4 inhibitors and pioglitazone, and a reduced CV risk compared to sulphonylureas.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetic Angiopathies/prevention & control , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Linagliptin/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Angiopathies/epidemiology , Diabetic Angiopathies/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pioglitazone/therapeutic use , Propensity Score , Sulfonylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
3.
Sex Transm Dis ; 31(10): 581-7, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15388994

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with syphilis among men who report sex with other men in New York City. DESIGN, SETTING AND STUDY SUBJECTS: We conducted a case-control study among 88 men who reported sex with men in the previous year, 18 to 55 years old and diagnosed with primary or secondary syphilis during 2001; and 176 control subjects frequently matched by age and type of health provider. RESULTS: HIV prevalence among syphilis cases was 48% compared with 15% among control subjects (P <0.001). Variables associated with syphilis in a multivariate model were HIV infection (odds ratio [OR], 7.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-15.4), income >$30,000 per year (OR, 2.7; CI, 1.4-5.2), and barebacking (OR, 2.6; CI, 1.4-4.8). The median time since HIV diagnosis for HIV-positive was 6 years for cases and 7 years for control subjects (P = 0.70). Among HIV-infected participants, syphilis cases were more likely than control subjects to report being on antiretroviral therapy (69% vs. 44%, P = 0.05) and to report having undetectable viral load (58% vs. 24%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: HIV infection was strongly associated with syphilis in this study. High-risk behavior reported by both cases and control subjects indicates the potential for increased HIV transmission.


Subject(s)
Homosexuality, Male , Syphilis/epidemiology , Syphilis/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Case-Control Studies , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Risk-Taking , Surveys and Questionnaires , Viral Load
4.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol ; 14(4): 582-9, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15662150

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neuropsychiatric disorder associated with motor and vocal tics. Some people with TS have reported using alternative or complementary medicine (CAM), including nutritional supplements to control their tics. In a recent national survey, approximately 40% of people reported having used CAM in the prior year. We attempted to explore the use of supplements and other CAM among TS patients. METHOD: We developed a survey instrument based on anecdotal accounts of CAM use and distributed it to the mailing list of the New York Chapter of the Tourette Syndrome Association (n=500) and the subscription list of Latitudes, a newsletter exploring CAM treatments for neurological conditions (n=750). Responses were entered in a database and analyzed using SPSS version 10. RESULTS: Of 115 respondents, 87.8% reported using 1 or more of 29 nutritional supplements to control symptoms. Many also reported using other CAM. Most supplement users reported an improvement in tics. CONCLUSIONS: Although these results are not generalizable, they provide no evidence that use of supplements and other CAM is rarer among TS patients than in the general population. Given that most of our respondents were also using conventional medication, further study of the use of supplements and other CAM therapies by people with TS, the safety and efficacy of such therapies in this population, and possible interactions of such therapies with conventional treatment seems warranted.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Dietary Supplements/statistics & numerical data , Tourette Syndrome/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Central Nervous System Agents/administration & dosage , Child , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...