1.
Allergy
; 58(7): 559-69, 2003 Jul.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-12823111
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Child , Child Welfare , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunologic Tests/classification , Immunologic Tests/standards , Infant , Prevalence
2.
Ann Chir
; 126(5): 459-62, 2001 Jun.
Article
in French
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-11447800
ABSTRACT
STUDY AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the infectious local risk when the wound dressing was removed or not after 48 hours, and to look for the other advantages or disadvantages of these two methods. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Two groups of 50 patients who underwent a thoracic or abdominal procedure, class I or II according to Altemeier, have been randomly selected: one received a wound dressing after 48 hours, and the second did not. RESULTS: The clinical features were comparable between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the outcome of the two groups of patients in terms of wound infection (only one infected wound in each group). CONCLUSION: Wound dressing usually seems unnecessary.
Subject(s)
Bandages , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Wound Healing , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm
; 88(8): 32, 1995 Aug.
Article
in French
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-7564173