[Feasibility of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology and evaluation of occult tubal lesions prevalence: Preliminary study]. / Faisabilité de la salpingectomie prophylactique lors d'une hystérectomie d'indication bénigne par voie vaginale et évaluation de la prévalence des lésions tubaires occultes : étude préliminaire.

AIM: To assess the feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology and the prevalence of occult tubal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study from 09/01/2013 to 11/01/2014, patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy were included. The prevalence of bilateral salpingectomy with or without ovariectomy and the prevalence of histopathological and immunohistochemical (p53 expression) abnormalities were evaluated. RESULTS: Bilateral salpingectomy was performed in 51/69 patients (73.9%). An elevated BMI was statistically associated with a failure of the salpingectomy (29.4 vs 25.8; P=0.01). There was only one case of postoperative hemorrhage in the salpingectomy group. On the 51fallopian tubes, there were 4 (12.9%) immunohistochemical abnormalities "p53 signature". CONCLUSION: The recent tubal origin of most ovarian cancer cases raised the question of the prophylactic salpingectomy in the population with genetic risk as well as in the general population. Bilateral salpingectomy may be performed during vaginal hysterectomy. However caution is needed because we do not know what is the exact evolution of the p53 signatures.

[Forceps delivery: Professionals' knowledge of forceps application in the area of Lyon]. / Extraction par forceps : état des connaissances des professionnels des centres hospitaliers du Grand Lyon.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe knowledge on forceps delivery in the area of Lyon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a multicentric observational study carried between January 1, 2013 and June 9, 2013. A questionnaire was sent to obstetricians and residents of the area of Lyon. It related prerequisites for operative vaginal delivery, the method used to apply forceps, practices and preferences of operators. RESULTS: Seventy-five responses were obtained (47 obstetricians, 28 residents). About prerequisites: 6.4% of the obstetricians and 14.3% of the residents never do urinary catheterization. Instrumental delivery is never performed when the fetal head is not engaged. Mid-pelvic operative vaginal delivery is performed by 51.1% of obstetricians. Trans-abdominal ultrasound assessment is conducted in cases of clinical doubts about the fetal head position. For occipital anterior and left anterior positions, the left blade is first applied. A flexion of the fetal head is applied for anterior positions but not in posterior positions. Most of operators do not perform instrumental rotation. Vacuum extractor is the privileged instrument for obstetricians and forceps is often used in second line. CONCLUSION: This study shows that most of the recommendations for forceps delivery are followed. In front of the lake of statistical power of this study, it might be interesting to improve a largest study with a comparison between obstetricians and residents' practices.