Noradrenergic fibers are associated with beta-cell dedifferentiation and impaired beta-cell function in humans.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by a progressive loss of beta-cell function, and the "disappearance" of beta-cells in T2D may also be caused by the process of beta -cell dedifferentiation. Since noradrenergic innervation inhibits insulin secretion and density of noradrenergic fibers is increased in type 2 diabetes mouse models, we aimed to study the relation between islet innervation, dedifferentiation and beta-cell function in humans. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, we analyzed pancreata from organ donors and from patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. In the latter, a pre-surgical detailed metabolic characterization by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and hyperglycemic clamp was performed before surgery, thus obtaining in vivo functional parameters of beta-cell function and insulin secretion. RESULTS: The islets of diabetic subjects were 3 times more innervated than controls (0.91 ±â€¯0.21 vs 0.32 ±â€¯0.10, n.fibers/islet; p = 0.01), and directly correlated with the dedifferentiation score (r = 0.39; p = 0.03). In vivo functional parameters of insulin secretion, assessed by hyperglycemic clamp, negatively correlated with the increase in fibers [beta-cell Glucose Sensitivity (r = -0.84; p = 0.01), incremental second-phase insulin secretion (r = -0.84, p = 0.03) and arginine-stimulated insulin secretion (r = -0.76, p = 0.04)]. Moreover, we observed a progressive increase in fibers, paralleling worsening glucose tolerance (from NGT through IGT to T2D). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Noradrenergic fibers are significantly increased in the islets of diabetic subjects and this positively correlates with beta-cell dedifferentiation score. The correlation between in vivo insulin secretion parameters and the density of pancreatic noradrenergic fibers suggests a significant involvement of these fibers in the pathogenesis of the disease, and indirectly, in the islet dedifferentiation process.

Vitamin D deficiency: a new risk factor for type 2 diabetes?.

Recent compelling evidence suggests a role of vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and insulin secretion derangements, with a consequent possible interference with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mechanism of this link is incompletely understood. In fact, vitamin D deficiency is usually detected in obesity in which insulin resistance is also a common finding. The coexistence of insulin resistance and vitamin D deficiency has generated several hypotheses. Some cross-sectional and prospective studies have suggested that vitamin D deficiency may play a role in worsening insulin resistance; others have identified obesity as a risk factor predisposing individuals to exhibit both vitamin D deficiency and insulin resistance. The available data from intervention studies are largely confounded, and inadequate considerations of seasonal effects on 25(OH)D concentrations are also a common design flaw in many studies. On the contrary, there is strong evidence that obesity might cause both vitamin D deficiency and insulin resistance, leaving open the possibility that vitamin D and diabetes are not related at all. Although it might seem premature to draw firm conclusions on the role of vitamin D supplementation in reducing insulin resistance and preventing type 2 diabetes, this manuscript will review the circumstances leading to vitamin D deficiency and how such a deficiency can eventually independently affect insulin sensitivity.

Metabolic syndrome in transplant patients: an updating point of view.

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a cluster of risk factors that predispose to major cardiovascular diseases and its complications, determining liver and kidney impairment. In the last decade, the indications to transplantation are increasing, with a linear incidence of the complications of the procedure. MS represents one of the commonest, being in turn may the consequence of the underlying disease that required the transplantation, or the result of the medical treatment, as well as one of the most important factor influencing the morbidity and mortality of the transplanted patients. Due to the growing incidence of the MS in these patients, it is crucial to focus and clarify the leading causes determining the onset of the metabolic disarrangement, its outcome and the hypothetical mechanism through which the clinicians could reduce the impact of the disease. In fact, prevention, early recognition, and treatment of the factor that could predict the onset or progression of the MS after the transplantation may impact long term survival of patients, that is again the scope of the same transplant. This review will update the different mechanisMS of the pathogenesis of MS in this population, the clinical effects of the presence of the MS, observing the risk factors to be treated before and after the transplantation and suggesting the management of the follow-up.

Can vitamin D deficiency cause diabetes and cardiovascular diseases? Present evidence and future perspectives.

Several studies have shown that vitamin D may play a role in many biochemical mechanisms in addition to bone and calcium metabolism. Recently, vitamin D has sparked widespread interest because of its involvement in the homeostasis of the cardiovascular system. Hypovitaminosis D has been associated with obesity, related to trapping in adipose tissue due to its lipophilic structure. In addition, vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and this may be due to the relationship between low vitamin D levels and obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, endothelial dysfunction and hypertension. However, although vitamin D has been identified as a potentially important marker of CVD, the mechanisms through which it might modulate cardiovascular risk are not fully understood. Given this background, in this work we summarise clinical retrospective and prospective observational studies linking vitamin D levels with cardio-metabolic risk factors and vascular outcome. Moreover, we review various randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of vitamin D supplementation on surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk. Considering the high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among patients with high cardiovascular risk, vitamin D replacement therapy in this population may be warranted; however, further RCTs are urgently needed to establish when to begin vitamin D therapy, as well as to determine the dose and route and duration of administration.

In anorexia nervosa, even a small increase in abdominal fat is responsible for the appearance of insulin resistance.

CONTEXT: The aim of treatment in patients affected by anorexia nervosa (AN) is weight recovery. However, during weight gain, anorectic patients' body composition is changed, with an increase in abdominal fat, particularly in the visceral compartment. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that changes in body composition, particularly in abdominal fat, are responsible for the variability in insulin sensitivity (IS) in different stages of AN. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: We compared 20 anorectic patients in the acute stage, 19 in the weight-recovery stage and 21 controls. All subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test, hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition. RESULTS: The percentage of trunk fat was higher in weight recovery than in the acute phase (47·7 ± 8·4%vs 34·6 ± 7·6%; P ≤ 0·01) and in the control group (33·4 ± 7·6; P < 0·01 vs weight recovery). Although the recovery group gained weight, their body mass index (BMI) was not statistically different from that of the acute group (14·4 ± 1·1 vs 13·6 ± 1·8 kg/m(2) ). Insulin sensitivity was lower in the weight-recovery group than the acute group (4·7 ± 1·5 vs 7·8 ± 1·6 mg/kg/min; P < 0·01) and controls (7·7 ± 1·4 mg/kg/min; P < 0·01). A linear negative correlation was found between IS and the percentage of abdominal fat in the weight-recovery and acute groups (r = -0·51; P = 0·04 and r = -0·53; P = 0·04 respectively), while IS did not correlate with BMI. CONCLUSION: Although weight-recovery represents the main aim of treatment in AN, refeeding is associated with an increase in abdominal fat which might be responsible of the onset of insulin resistance. As BMI and weight-recovery were associated with impaired IS, they cannot be considered the only aim of treatment of AN.

Metabolic syndrome in transplant patients: an academic or a health burden?

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of risk factors that predispose to major cardiovascular diseases, liver steatosis and fibrosis, as well as reduced renal function. Metabolic syndrome and its early hepatic manifestation, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, are prevalent both among the general population and in pre- and posttransplantation settings. Because indications for solid-organ transplantation are gradually increasing, attention should focus on the incidence of metabolic syndrome among transplanted patients, defined as posttransplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS). Subjects with worse metabolic profiles with two or more criteria of the syndrome show lower survival rates and greater co-morbidities. However, it is still unclear whether the pathophysiology of posttransplantation metabolic syndrome differ from that of the general population and may be determined by the primary disease affecting the liver or kidney, or amplified or altered by the immunosuppressive treatment, as it has already been established that corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors cause metabolic disarrangements. Although there is controversy regarding the definition and the impact of PTMS on overall survival rates following transplantation, these patients are at increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Early recognition, prevention, and treatment of these conditions may impact long-term survival after transplantation. Thus, even if metabolic syndrome in transplant patients remains an unclear definition, an insulin resistance is present in these patients. The treatment of this condition represents a health problem that requires intervention by clinicians before and after transplantation.