ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that is reported to be rare in Africans. The objective of this study is to share the experience of our Gastroenterology practice in Calabar, Cross River State on IBD. METHODS: This is a ten-year review of the records of patients visiting the Gastroenterology clinic of the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital and two private gastroenterology clinics in Calabar Municipality. The diagnosis of IBD was made based on clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and histological data obtained. RESULTS: Eight patients presented with features consistent with IBD. Six had ulcerative colitis while 2 had Crohn's disease. Seven patients had moderate disease with the main clinical features being recurrent mucoid bloody diarrhoea. All the patients had treatments with either sulphasalazine or mesalazine as well as azathioprine, steroids and antibiotics with variable response. One patient had strictures requiring a colostomy, while another developed colorectal cancer as complications of IBD. CONCLUSION: Although IBD is uncommon in Nigeria, a high index of suspicion is important, especially in patients presenting with the recurrent passage of mucoid bloody stools. Hence, the role of colonoscopy and histology are invaluable in establishing the diagnosis.
FONDEMENT: La maladie inflammatoire de l'intestin (MII) est un trouble inflammatoire chronique du tractus gastro-intestinal qui est rapporté comme étant rare chez les Africains. L'objectif de cette étude est de partager l'expérience de notre pratique en gastroentérologie à Calabar, dans l'État de Cross River, sur la MII. MÉTHODES: Il s'agit d'une revue de dix ans des dossiers des patients fréquentant la clinique de gastro-entérologie de l'Hôpital universitaire de Calabar et de deux cliniques privées de gastroentérologie dans la municipalité de Calabar. Le diagnostic de MII a été posé sur la base de données cliniques, biologiques, endoscopiques et histologiques obtenues. RÉSULTATS: Huit patients présentaient des caractéristiques compatibles avec la MII. Six présentaient une colite ulcéreuse tandis que 2 présentaient une maladie de Crohn. Sept patients avaient une maladie modérée avec comme principale caractéristique clinique des diarrhées muqueuses sanglantes récurrentes. Tous les patients ont été traités soit avec de la sulfasalazine soit avec de la mésalazine ainsi que de l'azathioprine, des stéroïdes et des antibiotiques avec une réponse variable. Un patient avait des sténoses nécessitant une colostomie, tandis qu'un autre développait un cancer colorectal comme complications de la MII. CONCLUSION: Bien que la MII soit rare au Nigeria, un indice de suspicion élevé est important, surtout chez les patients présentant un passage récurrent de selles muqueuses sanglantes. Ainsi, le rôle de la coloscopie et de l'histologie est inestimable pour établir le diagnostic. MOTS-CLÉS: Adultes, Maladie de Crohn, Maladie inflammatoire de l'intestin, Colite ulcéreuse.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Gastroenterology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Adult , Humans , Nigeria/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/etiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir is a well-tolerated regimen with high sustained virological response (SVR) rates in pre-liver transplant patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), but data in liver transplant recipients outside of clinical trials is limited. AIM: To address this knowledge gap and assess SVR rates without the use of ribavirin in liver transplant recipients METHODS: This is a retrospective study examining the treatment of 75 post-liver transplant recipients with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir without ribavirin. Differences between SVR cohorts and predictors of SVR were analysed in an intention-to-treat (ITT) fashion. RESULTS: A total of 408 genotype 1, HCV patients were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir from October 2014 to August 2015 at our centre. Seventy-three patients were post-liver transplant and were treated with a median of 2.9 years from transplant. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir achieved an SVR12 of 95.9%. African Americans made up 28.8% of the cohort. Sixty-three per cent of patients were treated previously, including 13.7% of patients previously treated with direct-acting antivirals. Only 2.7% had recurrent allograft cirrhosis, and the majority (90.4%) was on calcineurin inhibitor based immunosuppressive therapy. Approximately 82% of patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2 or 3. In univariate logistic regression, only detectable week 8 viral load was predictive of failure to achieve SVR. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm excellent SVR outcomes and favourable safety and tolerability profiles with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin in post-liver transplant recipients infected with HCV, despite treatment guidelines to use ribavirin.
