The first survey of the Saudi Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Program: Main results and long-term outcomes (STARS-1 Program).

BACKGROUND: Prior acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registries in Saudi Arabia might not have accurately described the true demographics and cardiac care of patients with ACS. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of a representative sample of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We conducted a 1-month snap-shot, prospective, multi-center registry study in 50 hospitals from various health care sectors in Saudi Arabia. We followed patients for 1 month and 1 year after hospital discharge. Patients with AMI included those with or without ST-segment elevation (STEMI or NSTEMI, respectively). This program survey will be repeated every 5 years. RESULTS: Between May 2015 and January 2017, we enrolled 2233 patients with ACS (mean age was 56 [standard deviation = 13] years; 55.6% were Saudi citizens, 85.7% were men, and 65.9% had STEMI). Coronary artery disease risk factors were high; 52.7% had diabetes mellitus and 51.2% had hypertension. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was utilized in only 5.2% of cases. Revascularization for patients with STEMI included thrombolytic therapy (29%), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); (42.5%), neither (29%), or a pharmaco-invasive approach (3%). Non-Saudis with STEMI were less likely to undergo primary PCI compared to Saudis (35.8% vs. 48.7%; respectively, p <0.001), and women were less likely than men to achieve a door-to-balloon time of <90 min (42% vs. 65%; respectively, p = 0.003). Around half of the patients with NSTEMI did not undergo a coronary angiogram. All-cause mortality rates were 4%, 5.8%, and 8.1%, in-hospital, at 1 month, and at 1 year, respectively. These rates were significantly higher in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need for primary prevention programs, improving the EMS infrastructure and utilization, and establishing organized ACS network programs. AMI care needs further improvement, particularly for women and non-Saudis.

Efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants on the resolution of left ventricular thrombus-A case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular thrombus is a frequent complication of acute myocardial infarction and a risk factor for thromboembolic complications. Warfarin has been frequently used, but has some disadvantages that limit its use. Direct oral anticoagulants, in particular Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban have been proved to be effective in preventing thromboembolism among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. However, no randomized clinical trials testing the efficacy and safety of these agents in patients with existing left ventricular thrombus. Furthermore, direct oral anticoagulants are still not approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the management of left ventricular thrombus. METHOD: This study was a retrospective cohort assessing the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban) on the resolution of left ventricular thrombus in patients taking either of these drugs during the study period from December, 2011 to December, 2016 at King Fahad Medical City. All patients' records were reviewed and all patients who were diagnosed with left ventricular thrombus were included. Patients without available echocardiogram records were excluded. The study was approved by the institutional review board of King Fahad medical city, Riyadh Saudi Arabia. RESULT: During the defined study period we found that 413 and 1218 patients were taking Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban, respectively. After filtering them based on the specialty of the prescriber, we ended up with 299 patients who have been started on Dabigatran and 448 patients who have been started on Rivaroxaban by cardiologists. Moreover, after reviewing echocardiogram reports for all of them (747 patients), we found that 11 patients were diagnosed to have left ventricular thrombus. Among those 11 patients, seven of them were treated with direct oral anticoagulants from the beginning and the remaining four patients were shifted from Warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants. All of them (7 patients) showed left ventricular thrombus resolution on follow-up echocardiogram. CONCLUSION: Use of direct oral anticoagulants showed promising results in the resolution of left ventricular thrombus in patients diagnosed with left ventricular thrombus. Further studies at multiple health care centers are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants as compared to traditional treatment in patients with left ventricular thrombus.