Using social media in safety signal management: is it reliable?

Social media use is growing globally, with a reported 3 billion active users in 2017. This medium is used increasingly in a health setting by patients (and to a limited extent, healthcare professionals) to share experiences and ask advice on medical conditions as well as pharmaceutical products. In recent years, attention has turned to this huge, generally untapped, source of potential health information as a possible tool for pharmacovigilance, and in particular signal detection. In this article we explore some of the challenges of utilizing social media for safety signal detection and look at some of the pilot studies conducted to date in order to weigh the evidence for and against the utility of social media data in safety signal detection. After doing so we can conclude that the analysis of social media datasets has demonstrated a limited contribution to the signal detection and signal management process. The data available in social media can complement blind spots in traditional pharmacovigilance datasets and provide significant value for targeted investigations and studies such as those relating to abuse, misuse, use in pregnancy, and patient sentiments.

Seprafilm® adhesion barrier: (1) a review of preclinical, animal, and human investigational studies.

The aim of this study was to provide a single site resource for investigators, clinicians, and others seeking preclinical, animal, and human investigational studies concerning the postsurgical, anti-adhesion barrier Seprafilm™ (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA). All published preclinical, animal, human extra-abdominal research as of July 2011 have been summarized and included in this document. Searches of Medline and EMBASE Drugs and Pharmaceuticals databases were conducted for original preclinical, animal, and human extra-abdominal studies involving Seprafilm. Preclinical, animal, and extra-abdominal human investigational studies are the study selection for this manuscript. Intraabdominal use is discussed in the accompanying manuscript. Data extraction includes systematic manuscript review. Summary of preclinical, animal, and extra-abdominal human investigational use of Seprafilm by surgical discipline were gathered for data synthesis. The clinical use of Seprafilm, which was approved by the FDA for intra-abdominal procedures, is supported by preclinical and animal studies relating to general surgical and obstetrical/gynecological applications. Findings from preclinical, animal, and human investigational studies at other sites throughout the body raises the potential for additional human clinical trials to assess efficacy and safety following surgical procedures at non-abdominal locations.

Seprafilm(®) adhesion barrier: (2) a review of the clinical literature on intraabdominal use.

This study seeks to provide a review of the clinical data published as of July 2011 concerning the postsurgical adhesion barrier, Seprafilm (chemically modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcelulose; Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA). Included articles detail the application of Seprafilm for intraabdominal uses that have been approved (on-label) and those considered investigational (off-label) by the FDA. Medline and EMBASE Drugs and Pharmaceuticals databases were searched for all original clinical Seprafilm research published as of July 2011. All human Seprafilm intraabdominal clinical reports and studies, excluding those related to prosthetic mesh were included. Data extraction involved the systematic review of each article. The data synthesis is the summary of Seprafilm human intraabdominal clinical reports and studies describing safety and/or efficacy. The safety and efficacy of Seprafilm in reducing postoperative adhesions has been clearly demonstrated in abdominal and pelvic laparotomy. While reports have described the safe and successful use of Seprafilm following laparoscopy, pediatric laparotomy, and in patients with malignancy and/or infection, the safety and efficacy of Seprafilm use in these procedures has not been definitively established in randomized controlled trials.