Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 70(8): 351-61, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27177717

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this updated meta-analysis was to further assess the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: We carried out a literature search on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to October 2015. We calculated the pooled relative risk of relapse rate and standard mean difference (SMD) of mean change (data at a follow-up time-point - baseline) of the Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Mania Rating Scale scores with their 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Subgroup analyses based on follow-up time were performed. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 520 bipolar I or II disorder patients were reanalyzed. Overall analysis showed that CBT did not significantly reduce the relapse rate of BD or improve the level of depression. However, significant efficacy of CBT in improving severity of mania was proved based on the YMRS (SMD = -0.54, 95%CI, -1.03 to -0.06, P = 0.03) but not based on MRS. Subgroup analyses showed that CBT had short-term efficacy in reducing relapse rate of BD (at 6 months' follow-up: relative risk = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.29-0.81, P = 0.006) and improving severity of mania based on YMRS score (post-treatment: SMD = -0.30, 95%CI, -0.59 to -0.01, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Short-term efficacy of CBT in reducing relapse rate of BD and improving the severity of mania was proved. But these effects could be weakened by time. In addition, there was no effect of CBT on level of depression in BD.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Humans
2.
Psychiatry Res ; 230(2): 479-86, 2015 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26455759

ABSTRACT

We comprehensively examined prospective memory (PM) performance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and explored the cognitive and psychopathological correlates of PM in this clinical population. Fifty-eight OCD patients and 58 healthy controls were assessed with computer-based PM tasks and related neurocognitive functions, and the participants also reported frequency of PM failures and compulsive behaviours in daily life. OCD patients had intact activity-based PM performance but had lower accuracy in time-based PM and longer reaction time to event-based PM cues compared to healthy controls. Among the neurocognitive functions, both the WCST (perseverative error) and the letter number span correlated with time-based PM. OCD patients reported similar number of PM failures in daily life as controls, which correlated with their intact event-based PM performance, suggesting a generally good insight into their PM functions. Neither clinician-assessed nor self-reported OCD symptoms correlated with PM performance. This study indicates that PM impairment tends to vary with the PM cue types in OCD patients. In addition, certain executive functions (i.e., mental shifting and updating) may contribute to time-based PM impairment in patients with OCD.


Subject(s)
Memory Disorders/psychology , Memory, Episodic , Neuropsychological Tests , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Set, Psychology , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Adult , Cues , Executive Function , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Reaction Time , Young Adult
3.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry ; 39(1): 200-5, 2012 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22735396

ABSTRACT

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have increased rates of neurological soft signs (NSS) when compared to healthy controls. However, previous findings have been confounded by the presence of co-morbidity with disorders themselves associated with increased NSS, such as schizophrenia. Moreover, it remains unclear whether NSS in OCD reflect a vulnerability to this disorder. This study aimed to examine: 1) the severity of NSS in patients with OCD alone, in patients with OCD and co-morbid psychosis (schizophrenia or bipolar disorders), and in healthy controls; and b) whether unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with OCD also demonstrate a higher prevalence rate of NSS than healthy controls. NSS were assessed with the Cambridge Neurological Inventory (CNI) in 100 patients with OCD, 38 patients with OCD and psychosis (22 with bipolar disorders and 16 with schizophrenia), and 101 healthy controls. Forty-seven unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with OCD only were also administered the CNI. Patients with OCD showed significantly higher scores in motor coordination and total NSS than controls, and patients with OCD co-morbid with psychosis also showed significantly higher scores in motor coordination and total NSS than controls. Although there were no differences in NSS between patients with OCD only and OCD and psychosis as a whole, patients with OCD co-morbid with schizophrenia showed significantly higher scores in motor coordination than patients with OCD, patients with OCD and bipolar disorder, and healthy controls. Unaffected first-degree relatives only showed a higher prevalence rate than healthy controls in specific motor coordination signs, such as Opposition and Extinction. These findings suggest that patients with OCD exhibit more NSS than healthy controls, and that motor coordination signs may be even more extensive when OCD is co-morbid with psychosis. Some of these abnormalities may be indicative of a vulnerability to these disorders, as indicated by their presence in un-affected first-degree relatives.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Family/psychology , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Neurologic Examination/psychology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Symptom Assessment/psychology , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , China/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Humans , Male , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Neurologic Examination/methods , Neurologic Examination/statistics & numerical data , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Prevalence , Schizophrenia/complications , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data
4.
BMC Psychiatry ; 11: 129, 2011 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21824413

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) was designed to evaluate the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in both clinical and non-clinical samples. The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Chinese version of this scale. METHODS: The Chinese version of the OCI-R was administered to both a non-clinical sample (209 undergraduate students) and a clinical sample (56 obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the construct validity of the OCI-R in the non-clinical sample. The internal consistency at baseline and test-retest reliabilities at 4-week interval was examined in both the non-clinical and clinical samples. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis of the non-clinical sample confirmed a 6-factor model suggested by the original authors of the instrument (df = 120, RMSEA = 0.068, CFI = 0.88, NNFI = 0.85, GFI = 0.89). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were at an acceptable range for both the non-clinical and clinical samples. The OCI-R also showed good clinical discrimination for patients with OCD from healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the OCI-R is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring OCD symptoms in the Chinese context.


Subject(s)
Asian People/psychology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao ; 24(4): 371-4, 2004 Apr.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15090300

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between paraoxonase-1 (PON1) gene Gln192Arg polymorphism and sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Chinese. METHODS: A total of 165 AD patients and 174 age-matched control subjects were enrolled in this study for examination of PON1 Gln192Arg and apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). RESULTS: The distribution of PON1 allelic and genotypic frequencies did not significantly differ between AD patients and the control subjects, even after the stratification by ApoE-epsilon4 status. CONCLUSION: Gln192Arg polymorphism of the PON1 gene is not associated with sporadic AD in Chinese.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Aryldialkylphosphatase/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Apolipoproteins E/genetics , Female , Gene Frequency , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...