Influence of Body Mass Index on Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study was to compare reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) outcomes in normal weight, overweight, and obese patients. A RTSA outcomes registry was reviewed for rotator cuff-deficient patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, and revisions were excluded. Based on World Health Organization body mass index (BMI) classification, there were 29 normal weight, 50 overweight, and 51 obese patients. All groups demonstrated significant improvements from preoperative to most recent follow-up in function scores, pain, and forward elevation. Obese and overweight groups had significantly worse preoperative rotation than the normal weight group. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in absolute values or degree of improvement of rotation between groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of radiographic or clinical complications between groups. Results of this study suggest that BMI has little influence on outcomes or risk of complication following RTSA. Longer-term studies are needed to determine if these results are maintained. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances.

Evaluation and treatment of failed shoulder instability procedures.

Management of the unstable shoulder after a failed stabilization procedure can be difficult and challenging. Detailed understanding of the native shoulder anatomy, including its static and dynamic restraints, is necessary for determining the patient's primary pathology. In addition, evaluation of the patient's history, physical exam, and imaging is important for identifying the cause for failure after the initial procedure. Common mistakes include under-appreciation of bony defects, failure to recognize capsular laxity, technical errors, and missed associated pathology. Many potential treatment options exist for revision surgery, including open or arthroscopic Bankart repair, bony augmentation procedures, and management of Hill Sachs defects. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss in-depth the common risk factors for post-surgical failure, components for appropriate evaluation, and the different surgical options available for revision stabilization. Level of evidence Level V.