ABSTRACT
The major disadvantage of cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) is difficulty in retrievability. The retentive strengths of the provisional luting agents usually employed in these cases are therefore an important consideration. This study evaluated the cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of FPDs supported by 2 implants or 4 implants. Nogenol luting agent exhibited the lowest retentive values in both types of FPD. ImProv proved to be the most retentive cement of all tested. Temp Bond NE and Temp Bond presented significantly different values (P < .05) for the 2-implant FPD, but not for the 4-implant model. On the basis of the study results, it may be concluded that Nogenol appears to be more appropriate for cementation of both 2- and 4-implant-supported FPDs when removal of the provisionally cemented superstructure is anticipated.
Subject(s)
Dental Cements , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Restoration Failure , Denture, Partial, Fixed , Analysis of Variance , Cementation , Dental Abutments , Dental Prosthesis Retention/methods , Denture, Partial, Temporary , Device Removal , Drug Combinations , Eugenol , Fatty Acids , Humans , Materials Testing , Resins, Plant , Salicylates , Tensile Strength , Thymol , Zinc OxideABSTRACT
This article describes a procedure that uses the Ney MS (Minimal Space) intracoronal attachment as an interlock in a pontic. This procedure overcomes the disadvantages associated with the use of the intracoronal attachments, which are (1) excessive tooth reduction often required to place the attachment within the contour of the crown; (2) compromised embrasures, which result in oral hygiene and periodontal problems; and (3) poor esthetics.
