ONS Guidelines™ for Cancer Treatment-Related Hot Flashes in Women With Breast Cancer and Men With Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Hot flashes are a common and troublesome side effect of surgery or endocrine therapy. They may lead to physical and psychological distress and negatively affect quality of life. This clinical practice guideline presents evidence-based recommendations for pharmacologic, behavioral, and natural health product interventions for treatment-related hot flashes in patients with breast or prostate cancer. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: An interprofessional panel of healthcare professionals with patient representation prioritized clinical questions and patient outcomes for the management of hot flashes. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. FINDINGS: The panel agreed on 14 pharmacologic, behavioral, and natural health recommendations. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Conditional recommendations include the use of antidepressants rather than no treatment, physical activity rather than no treatment, and the avoidance of gabapentin and dietary supplements in the treatment of hot flashes. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL CAN BE FOUND AT HTTPS: //onf.ons.org/ons-guidelines-hot-flashes-supplementary-material.

Women in oncology pharmacy leadership: A white paper.

Gender disparity exists in leadership roles within healthcare. While the majority of the healthcare workforce is comprised of women, significantly fewer women occupy leadership positions, particularly at executive and board levels. As the field of oncology pharmacy continues to rapidly expand and evolve, an assessment of the current state of women in oncology pharmacy leadership roles is vital to the growth and development of the profession. In the fall of 2017, the Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) hosted a summit to explore leadership issues facing women in oncology pharmacy which have the potential to affect our membership and our profession. This meeting included invited participants from across the fields of oncology and pharmacy and was part of HOPA's strategic leadership initiative developed through the work of the HOPA Leadership Development Committee in 2016. This promotes a primary goal of HOPA, which is to support oncology pharmacists as they assume leadership roles within their practices and within healthcare to assure oncology pharmacy is integrated into cancer care. The purpose of this white paper is to (1) summarize key issues that were identified through a membership survey; (2) review ongoing efforts to address the needs of female oncology pharmacists in leadership development; (3) serve as a call to action for individuals and professional organizations to assist with and disseminate these efforts and highlight available resources, and (4) to provide practical steps to meet the needs of individuals, training programs, and institutions/employers.

Incidence, risk factors, and management of infusion-related reactions in breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab has become a mainstay of therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 overexpressed breast cancer in nearly all stages of the disease. Like many monoclonal antibodies, trastuzumab is associated with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) that are not well described, and incidence varies widely between reports (0.7%-40% of patients). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of breast cancer patients who received trastuzumab was conducted. The primary objective was to describe the incidence, risk factors, and management of IRRs during the first 12 weeks of trastuzumab therapy in a general population of breast cancer patients. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients who received trastuzumab (1,788 doses) were evaluated. Thirty-three IRRs were identified in 32 patients, resulting in an incidence of 16.2% of patients and 1.8% of doses. All IRRs were mild or moderate in severity and were successfully managed with supportive medications and/or by temporarily stopping the infusion. All patients received subsequent cycles of trastuzumab, with only one patient experiencing a subsequent reaction. Body mass index, stage of disease, and use of premedications were significantly associated with IRRs by multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Overall, these results support that the vast majority of IRRs occur with the first infusion, are mild in severity, and are easily managed. In addition, risk factors were identified that may help to identify a population of patients at increased risk of IRRs who may benefit from premedication.

Pilot study to assess toxicity and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer and impaired liver function secondary to hepatic metastases.

BACKGROUND: Limited clinical data are available regarding the safety of docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients with liver dysfunction. METHODS: Eligible patients had breast cancer with impaired liver function secondary to hepatic metastases and were candidates for docetaxel therapy. They were assigned to one of five groups on the basis of total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase levels. All other causes of liver dysfunction were excluded, and bile duct obstruction was corrected, if possible, prior to study entry. Patients received docetaxel every three weeks. The chemotherapy dose was chosen on the basis of the patient's level of hepatic dysfunction and escalated as tolerated. The primary outcome of this study was safety. The secondary outcomes were pharmacokinetic data and efficacy in terms of time to disease progression. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Grade 3/4 fatigue (65%), neutropenia (30%), myalgias (26%), neutropenic fever (26%), vomiting (9%), and rash (9%) were the most common serious adverse events. The median time to progression was three months (range 1-18 months). Pharmacokinetic results indicated that patients with more severe hepatic dysfunction may have been underdosed based on our conservative dosing strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel can be administered to patients with metastatic breast cancer and liver dysfunction after dose attenuation. However, because of a narrow therapeutic index in this clinical setting, therapy should be closely monitored with subsequent dose escalation when possible.

Clinical outcomes of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service for breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Report descriptive outcome measures related to the quality of pharmacist-managed anticoagulation care with warfarin in patients with breast cancer since the formation of the anticoagulation management service (AMS). METHODS: Retrospective review of 145 patients with breast cancer (median age 54 years) receiving warfarin therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) managed by the pharmacist-run AMS between 1998 and 2005. RESULTS: The median time followed by the AMS was 151 days. Fifty three percent (n = 1651) of total lab draws (n = 3129) were within the target therapeutic INR range 2-3. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 4.1% of patients. Minor bleeding occurred in 18.6% of patients and major bleeding occurred in three patients (2.1%, gastrointestinal, intra-abdominal, and subdural hematoma). CONCLUSION: To date, this is the largest known published database of cancer patients receiving anticoagulation in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service. Recurrent VTE rates, major and minor bleeding rates, and percentage of time spent within the therapeutic range are slightly different in our patient population compared to an oncology population receiving warfarin and a non-oncology population with warfarin managed by AMS. Oral anticoagulation with warfarin is an effective, albeit complicated, treatment for venous thromboembolism in the oncology population. Although low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapy is now the preferred treatment for thrombosis in malignancy, warfarin is still relevant in patients who are unable to receive treatment with LMWH. This report provides valuable information supporting coordinated anticoagulation therapy with a pharmacist-managed service in a breast cancer-specific population, and contributes to the growing data supporting the challenging nature of maintaining warfarin anticoagulation in patients with cancer.

Usage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients at an academic cancer center and experience with specific care management tools for anemia.

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued regulatory alerts for use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in cancer patients with anemia after clinical trials and meta-analysis data found that high ESA doses were associated with adverse outcomes in patients. In response to these findings, specific patient management tools for anemia (consisting in an algorithm and prescribing order set) were developed by a multidisciplinary team at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. METHODS: A retrospective study consisted of 7117 patients aged 18 years and older with cancer malignancies who had received an ESA between January 2006 and December 2008 at MD Anderson. Changes in utilization of ESAs and packed red blood cells (PRBCs) were evaluated. RESULTS: The number of ESA doses dispensed each month decreased by 83% from January 2006 to December 2008 (P < .01), and the number of patients who received ESAs decreased by 80% (P < .01). The number of dispensed ESA doses for hemoglobin (Hb) levels ≥ 12 g/dL decreased significantly from 4% to 0% (P < .01), and the number for ≥ 10 g/dL decreased from 44% to 12% (P < .01). The PRBC transfusion rate remained stable in solid tumor patients (P > .05) but increased from 7% to 9% (P < .05) in patients with hematologic malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: The authors summarized their experience with use of ESAs in a tertiary oncology center. The implementation of their patient management tools for anemia might have facilitated the observed change at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Docetaxel-associated epiphora.

Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane indicated for the treatment of advanced breast, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancers; it is also used for the treatment of various other solid tumors. The standard intermittent dosage of docetaxel is 60-100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. At this dose and schedule, myelosuppression is common and neutropenia is usually the dose-limiting toxicity. Weekly administration of docetaxel 20-42 mg/m2 is being tested in the treatment of advanced solid tumors in order to improve patient tolerance by reducing the interval dose and to maintain therapeutic efficacy by increasing overall dose intensity. Asthenia and peripheral neuropathy can limit continued administration of weekly docetaxel. Epiphora (excess tearing due to narrowing or blockage of the lacrimal outflow passages) is associated with repeated weekly administration of docetaxel. This adverse effect can interfere with activities of daily life and negatively affect quality of life. Epiphora may be an underreported adverse effect of treatment because of underrecognition by clinicians and patient embarrassment with respect to seemingly uncontrolled tearing. The use of weekly docetaxel administration is expanding; therefore, patients should be educated to recognize and report signs and symptoms of epiphora. It is important for clinicians participating in the care of patients undergoing treatment with docetaxel to monitor for excess tearing and signs of eye irritation to ensure timely management of treatment-related epiphora.

Adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Emerging data from clinical trials on the use of aromatase inhibitors in the management of early-stage, hormone-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women are reviewed. SUMMARY: Aromatase is the enzyme responsible for the conversion of androgens to estrogens and the only source of estrogens in postmenopausal women. Clinical trials using aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer are few but significant because of their comparative design with tamoxifen given for five years, long regarded as the gold standard for breast cancer treatment. Data from the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen and Combination trial, the MA-17 trial (letrozole compared with placebo), the Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex trial (anastrozole following tamoxifen), and the Intergroup Exemestane Study have shown promising efficacy and safety in the use of these agents. While the optimal aromatase inhibitor for use in the adjuvant setting has not been elucidated, current evidence-based recommendations include using (1) anastrozole as the first adjuvant therapy for five years, (2) tamoxifen for two to three years, then exemestane or anastrozole for the remainder of the five years, and (3) tamoxifen for five years, then letrozole for another five years. CONCLUSION: While their impact on survival has not been determined, aromatase inhibitors are slowly changing the management of early-stage, hormone-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women because of improved disease-free survival rates. Their ultimate role in therapy is unknown, but educating patients about the potential risks and benefits will allow them to make informed decisions regarding these data and their breast cancer care.