ABSTRACT
Extraction of an internal fixation device during the conversion of a failed intertrochanteric osteotomy to a total hip arthroplasty (THR) may lead to excessive trauma of the femoral shaft. In an attempt to bypass this risk, we performed THR leaving the old osteosynthetic material (straight plates and screws) in 10 of 48 patients operated on during the last 20 years. In another 8 patients, most of the osteosynthetic material was removed, but screw fragments were left in the canal. Insertion of the cement and the stem was unexpectedly easy in all 18 cases. After a mean follow-up of 10 (5-20) years there were no clinical problems. Radiographically, there were no signs of loosening, with only an occasional slight osteoporosis of the greater trochanter. Although theoretically the coexistence of different metals in the shaft should be avoided, in practice it does not appear to create a problem for patients. This may be attributed to insulation of the dissimilar materials by the cement. In conclusion, in cases where removal of the osteosynthetic device is expected to lead to severe trauma of the femur, our findings indicate that it is no disadvantage to perform the THR leaving the internal fixation material in place.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Osteotomy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Treatment FailureABSTRACT
Thirty revision total hip arthroplasties were performed using the Wagner long uncemented femoral stem. Pre-operative indication included severe proximal femoral bone loss (and in no case was the proximal femur able to support a standard-length uncemented stem). For 15 (50%) patients the procedure was a first revision whereas the other 15 (50%) patients had already undergone one or more previous revisions. The average follow-up was 36.5 months. In all cases regeneration of the proximal femoral bone stock occurred without bone graft. Subsidence of the stem was noted in 6 (20%) patients, but was asymptomatic and did not require re-operation.
Subject(s)
Bone Resorption/surgery , Femur/physiology , Hip Prosthesis/methods , Bone Regeneration , Cementation , Female , Femur/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , WalkingSubject(s)
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease/surgery , Muscular Atrophy/surgery , Paralysis/surgery , Tendon Transfer , Thumb/surgery , Humans , Male , MethodsABSTRACT
A case of mallet finger in a child is described. The epiphysis of the terminal phalanx was displaced dorsally with the extensor tendon attached to it, and was first diagnosed two weeks after injury. The treatment was by open reduction. Radiograph three years later showed that a satisfactory position of the epiphysis and normal growth of the terminal phalanx had occurred.