Oral and enteral resuscitation of burn shock the historical record and implications for mass casualty care.

In the aftermath of a mass disaster, standard care methods for treatment of burn injury will often not be available for all victims. A method of fluid resuscitation for burns that has largely been forgotten by contemporary burn experts is enteral resuscitation. We identified 12 studies with over 700 patients treated with enteral resuscitation, defined as drinking or gastric infusion of salt solutions, from the literature. These studies suggest that enteral resuscitation can be an effective treatment for burn shock under conditions in which the standard IV therapy is unavailable or delayed, such as in mass disasters and combat casualties. Enteral resuscitation of burn shock was effective in patients with moderate (10-40% TBSA) and in some patients with more severe injuries. The data suggests that some hypovolemic burn and trauma patients can be treated exclusively with enteral resuscitation, and others might benefit from enteral resuscitation as an initial alternative and a supplement to IV therapy. A complication of enteral resuscitation was vomiting, which occurred less in children and much less when therapy was initiated within the first postburn hour. Enteral resuscitation is contra-indicated when the patient is in "peripheral circulatory collapse". The optimal enteral solution and regimen has not yet been defined, nor has its efficacy been tested against modern IV resuscitation. The oldest studies used glucose-free solutions of buffered isotonic and hypotonic saline. Studies that are more recent show benefit of adding glucose to electrolyte solutions similar to those used in the treatment of cholera. If IV therapy for mass casualty care is delayed due to logistical constraints, enteral resuscitation should be considered.

Enteral resuscitation of burn shock using World Health Organization oral rehydration solution: a potential solution for mass casualty care.

Enteral resuscitation could provide a means to resuscitate burn shock when intravenous (IV) therapy is unavailable, such as in mass disasters. We evaluated the extent of intestinal absorption and resuscitative effects of World Health Organization Oral Rehydration Solution after a 40% TBSA burn in anesthetized swine compared with the IV infusion of lactated Ringer's infused by Parkland formula. Plasma volume (PV) was measured using indocyanine green dye dilution. Intestinal absorption was assessed using phenol red as a nonabsorbable marker. Changes in hematocrit, hemodynamics, and measured PV showed equivalent resuscitative effects of enteral and IV resuscitation. The duodenal fluid absorption rate started at 77 +/- 32 ml/hr per meter of intestine during the first hour and increased to 296 +/- 40 ml/hr during the fourth hour of resuscitation, with a total of 93 +/- 2% of World Health Organization Oral Rehydration Solution infused into the intestine being absorbed. Intestinal absorption rates after burn injury are sufficient to resuscitate a 40% TBSA burn.

Normotensive and hypotensive closed-loop resuscitation using 3.0% NaCl to treat multiple hemorrhages in sheep.

OBJECTIVE: NaCl solutions (7.5%) have been reported to be effective for resuscitation in animals and trauma patients, but these solutions are not approved for use in the United States. We hypothesized that infusion of Food and Drug Administration-approved 3% NaCl provides superior cardiovascular and metabolic function while reducing the overall fluid requirement for resuscitation of hemorrhage. Our objective was to compare four groups, hypotensive and normotensive resuscitation of hemorrhage using 3% NaCl (HS) or lactated Ringer's (LR). DESIGN: Sheep were hemorrhaged in three separate bleeds, 25 mL/kg at T0 mins and 5 mL/kg at both T50 and T70 mins. SETTING: University laboratory. SUBJECTS: Instrumented conscious sheep. INTERVENTIONS: Resuscitation was started at T30 mins and continued until T180. Normotensive and hypotensive resuscitation to mean arterial pressures of 90 mm Hg and 65 mm Hg, respectively, was performed with LR or HS using a closed-loop resuscitation system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All four groups were successfully resuscitated to near target levels. Two animals in the hypotensive treatment protocols died during the second and third bleeding, one with the LR65 group and one with the HS65 group. Mean infused volumes were 59.9 +/- 7.0 and 18.0 +/- 5.9 in the LR90 and LR65 groups, respectively, and were 19.6 +/- 2.2 mL/kg and 13.3 +/- 5.7 mL/kg in the HS90 and HS65 treatments (p < .05; LR90 vs. each of the groups). Cardiac indexes were significantly higher with normotensive vs. hypotensive treatment. However, there was no hemodynamic advantage apparent with HS vs. LR when compared with the normotensive or hypotensive treatments. Some animals had high lactate levels (>10 mmol) with both of the hypotensive treatments and also with the HS90 treatment, while not one of the 11 LR90 treatment animals had lactate levels >8 mmol. CONCLUSIONS: Volume sparing was apparent with HS, but no hemodynamic or metabolic advantage was apparent when used for either normotensive or hypotensive resuscitation. Trends toward lower base excess values and higher occurrences of deaths only in the hypotensive treatment protocols suggest that resuscitation to a target mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg may be too low.

Hypotensive resuscitation of multiple hemorrhages using crystalloid and colloids.

Hypotensive resuscitation has been advocated as a better means to perform field resuscitation of penetrating trauma. Our hypothesis is that hypotensive resuscitation using either crystalloid or colloid provides equivalent or improved metabolic function while reducing the overall fluid requirement for resuscitation of hemorrhage. We compared hypotensive and normotensive resuscitation of hemorrhage using lactated Ringer's (LR) with hypotensive resuscitation using Hextend (Hex), 6% hetastarch in isotonic buffered saline. Instrumented conscious sheep were hemorrhaged in three separate bleeds, 25 mL/kg at T0 and 5 mL/kg at both T50 and T70. Resuscitation was started at T30 and continued until T180. Hypotensive resuscitation to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg was performed with LR or Hex using a closed-loop resuscitation (CLR) system for a LR-65 and Hex-65 treatment protocol. A control treatment protocol was resuscitation with LR to a MAP target of 90 mmHg, LR-90. All treatment protocols were successfully resuscitated to near target levels. Two animals in the hypotensive treatment protocols died during the second and third bleedings, one in the LR-65 and one in the Hex-65 treatment protocol. Mean infused volumes were 61.4 +/- 11.3, 18.0 +/- 5.9, and 11.6 +/- 1.9 mL/kg in the LR-90, LR-65, and Hex-65 treatments, respectively (*P < 0.05 versus LR-90). Mean minimum base excess (BE) values were +1.9 +/- 1.4, -5.8 +/- 4.3, and -5.9 +/- 4.0 mEq/L in the LR-90, LR-65, and Hex-65 treatments, respectively. Hypotensive resuscitation with LR greatly reduced volume requirements as compared with normotensive resuscitation, and Hex achieved additional volume sparing. However, trends toward lower BE values and the occurrence of deaths only in the hypotensive treatment protocols suggest that resuscitation to a target MAP of 65 mmHg may be too low for optimal outcomes.