Inhaled drug delivery: a randomized study in intubated patients with healthy lungs.

BACKGROUND: The administration technique for inhaled drug delivery during invasive ventilation remains debated. This study aimed to compare in vivo and in vitro the deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated through four configurations during invasive ventilation, including setups optimizing drug delivery. METHODS: Thirty-one intubated postoperative neurosurgery patients with healthy lungs were randomly assigned to four configurations of aerosol delivery using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer and specific ventilator settings: (1) a specific circuit for aerosol therapy (SCAT) with the nebulizer placed at 30 cm of the wye, (2) a heated-humidified circuit switched off 30 min before the nebulization or (3) left on with the nebulizer at the inlet of the heated-humidifier, (4) a conventional circuit with the nebulizer placed between the heat and moisture exchanger filter and the endotracheal tube. Aerosol deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy. RESULTS: A two to three times greater lung delivery was measured in the SCAT group, reaching 19.7% (14.0-24.5) of the nominal dose in comparison to the three other groups (p < 0.01). Around 50 to 60% of lung doses reached the outer region of both lungs in all groups. Drug doses in inner and outer lung regions were significantly increased in the SCAT group (p < 0.01), except for the outer right lung region in the fourth group due to preferential drug trickling from the endotracheal tube and the trachea to the right bronchi. Similar lung delivery was observed whether the heated humidifier was switched off or left on. Inhaled doses measured in vitro correlated with lung doses (R = 0.768, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Optimizing the administration technique enables a significant increase in inhaled drug delivery to the lungs, including peripheral airways. Before adapting mechanical ventilation, studies are required to continue this optimization and to assess its impact on drug delivery and patient outcome in comparison to more usual settings.

Aerosol therapy in adult critically ill patients: a consensus statement regarding aerosol administration strategies during various modes of respiratory support.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice of aerosol delivery in conjunction with respiratory support devices for critically ill adult patients remains a topic of controversy due to the complexity of the clinical scenarios and limited clinical evidence. OBJECTIVES: To reach a consensus for guiding the clinical practice of aerosol delivery in patients receiving respiratory support (invasive and noninvasive) and identifying areas for future research. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was adopted to achieve a consensus on technical aspects of aerosol delivery for adult critically ill patients receiving various forms of respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, and high-flow nasal cannula. A thorough search and review of the literature were conducted, and 17 international participants with considerable research involvement and publications on aerosol therapy, comprised a multi-professional panel that evaluated the evidence, reviewed, revised, and voted on recommendations to establish this consensus. RESULTS: We present a comprehensive document with 20 statements, reviewing the evidence, efficacy, and safety of delivering inhaled agents to adults needing respiratory support, and providing guidance for healthcare workers. Most recommendations were based on in-vitro or experimental studies (low-level evidence), emphasizing the need for randomized clinical trials. The panel reached a consensus after 3 rounds anonymous questionnaires and 2 online meetings. CONCLUSIONS: We offer a multinational expert consensus that provides guidance on the optimal aerosol delivery techniques for patients receiving respiratory support in various real-world clinical scenarios.

Impact of Unintentional Air Leaks on Automatic Positive Airway Pressure Device Performance in Simulated Sleep Apnea Events.

BACKGROUND: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the accepted standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. In the last decades, automatic PAP (APAP) adjustment modes have been increasingly used. Pressure auto adjustment offers better comfort to the patient and represents a valuable help for the clinician to provide optimal treatment. However, device performance differs among manufacturers. Furthermore, the success of the therapy relies greatly on unintentional air leak level for many reasons, hence the importance to investigate the performance of the most common devices. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 3 APAP devices from the most common manufacturers in specific conditions (ie, obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, hypopnea), with and without unintentional air leak. METHODS: This was a bench test study. Performance tests were conducted on a breathing simulator using a Starling resistor, representing the upper airways, and an adjustable unintentional air leak valve. Three APAP devices (AirSense 10, DreamStation, and Prisma 20A) were tested in different scenarios. RESULTS: Without unintentional air leak, performance of the 3 devices was similar to existing literature. However, performance was altered with the addition of unintentional air leak in some scenario. The AirSense 10 was not able to respond correctly to obstructive apnea (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.021, P = .61) and hypopnea (ICC 0.059, P = .26). Prisma 20A lowest performance was seen during simulated obstructive apnea (ICC 0.708, P < .001). DreamStation lowest performance was seen during simulated hypopnea events (ICC 0.755, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: All 3 APAP devices reacted differently to the added unintentional air leak. Performance was altered with some devices, which could affect the therapy success in patients with sleep apnea syndrome. The variability of performance of some APAP devices with unintentional air leak should make clinicians evaluate their use in a home setting.

Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Non-Invasive Ventilator during the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Bench Study.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 breakout, a global call for low-cost portable ventilators was made following the strong demand for ventilatory support techniques. Among a few development projects, COVIDair non-invasive ventilator was developed and produced in a record time during the critical period of spring 2020. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate COVIDair performance (i.e., inspiratory trigger delay time, TDT, pressurization time and inspiratory to expiratory time ratio, I:E) on a test bench simulating physiological characteristics of breathing. METHOD: Performance tests were conducted on a breathing simulator (ASL 5000, IngMar Medical™) in two different lung mechanics (i.e., normal and severe restrictive). RESULTS: Under normal pulmonary mechanics, the inspiratory TDT is on average between 89.0 (±2.1) and 135.0 (±9.7) ms. In a situation of severe restrictive pulmonary mechanics, the inspiratory TDT is on average between 80 (±3.1) and 99.2 (±5.5) ms. Pressurization time to pre-set inspiratory pressure was on average from 234.6 (±5.5) to 318.6 (±1.9) ms. The absolute difference between the actual I:E cycling measure and the pre-set I:E cycling value ranged from 0.1 to 10.7% on average. CONCLUSION: In normal and severe restrictive pulmonary mechanics scenarios, the performance of COVIDair meets the expected standards for non-invasive ventilators.

Impact of additional HEPA filter on APAP performance and CPAP pressure level in simulated sleep apnea events.

Background: CPAP is the first line treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Recently, the use of added filters has been debated following the field safety notice of Philips Respironics™ on potential health risks due to foam degradation used in their ventilators. However, the added resistance of filters has never been analyzed. Objectives: The primary aim was to investigate the impact of four different filters on APAP mode performance with and without added unintentional air leaks (UIAL) with two simulated respiratory events. The secondary aim was to assess the pressure drop due to the increased filter resistance at different fixed CPAP pressure levels. Method: This is a bench study. Performance tests were performed on a breathing simulator (ASL 5000™) with a DreamStation™ device. To assess the combined effect of UIAL, a controlled valve was added to the setup. Results: Without UIAL, the algorithm was able to detect respiratory events and increase pressure level consequently. In the presence of UIAL, the device's response to simulated events was affected. In fixed CPAP mode, the median measured end-expiratory pressure was 6.2 to 10.0% (p < 0.001) below the set pressure with the additional filters. Additional UIAL severely impacted the delivered pressure with a median reduction up to 28.3% (p < 0.001) to the set pressure. Conclusion: Despite a slight pressure drop, the APAP algorithm still performed with additional filters when UIAL were avoided. However, the combined effect of added filter resistance and UIAL severely impacted APAP performance and effectively delivered set pressure.

Development challenges and opportunities in aerosol drug delivery systems in non-invasive ventilation in adults.

INTRODUCTION: With the gain in popularity of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), particularly in patients requiring drug delivery by aerosol therapy, the feasibility of the combination between NIV and aerosol therapy has regularly been questioned. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the in vitro and in vivo studies which explored the effects of this combination on pulmonary drug delivery (imaging and pharmacological studies) and on physiological measurements EXPERT OPINION: Even if the feasibility of the combination is evident, the type of nebulizer influences the lung deposition with a greater delivery with vibrating mesh nebulizers. The influence of the interfaces of NIV devices should be further investigated even if vented masks may seem less efficient for nebulization. There is also a need to develop new devices and modalities, or specific components better designed for a more efficient delivery, to offer more optimal particles size to lung delivery. The use of spacer also seems promising to improve the lung delivery even if strong evidences are still missing. Finally, it would be interesting to explore the influence of all spontaneous modes which use different flow-time curves. Further investigations should focus on the synchronization of the delivery with the inspiratory part of the respiratory cycle in patients during NIV, particularly when delivering toxic or expensive drugs.

Accuracy of Oxygen Flow Delivered by Compressed-Gas Cylinders in Hospital and Prehospital Emergency Care.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen cylinders are widely used both in hospital and prehospital care. Excessive or inappropriate FIO2 may be critical for patients with hypercapnia or hypoxia. Moreover, over-oxygenation could be deleterious in ischemic disorders. Supplemental oxygen from oxygen cylinder should therefore be delivered accurately. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of oxygen flows for oxygen cylinder in hospital and prehospital care. METHODS: A prospective trial was conducted to evaluate accuracy of delivered oxygen flows (2, 4, 6, 9 and 12 L/min) for different oxygen cylinder ready for use in different hospital departments. Delivered flows were analyzed randomly using a calibrated thermal mass flow meter. Two types of oxygen cylinder were evaluated: 78 oxygen cylinder with a single-stage regulator and 70 oxygen cylinder with a dual-stage regulator. Delivered flows were compared to the required oxygen flow. The residual pressure value for each oxygen cylinder was considered. A coefficient of variation was calculated to compare the variability of the delivered flow between the two types of oxygen cylinder. RESULTS: The median values of delivered flows were all ≥ 100% of the required flow for single stage (range 100-109%) and < 100% of required flow for dual stage (range 95-97%). The median values of the delivered flow differed between single and dual stage. It was found that single stage is significantly higher than dual stage (P = .01). At low flow, the dispersion of the measures for single stage was higher than with a high oxygen flow. Delivered flow differences were also found between low and high residual pressures, but only with single stage (P = .02). The residual pressure for both oxygen cylinders (no. = 148) ranged from 73 to 2,900 pounds per square inch, and no significant difference was observed between the 2 types (P = .86). The calculated coefficient of variation ranged from 7% (±1%) for dual stage to 8% (±2%) for single stage. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows good accuracy of oxygen flow delivered via oxygen cylinders. This accuracy was higher with dual stage. Single stage was also accurate, however, at low flow this accuracy is slightly less. Moreover, with single stage, when residual pressure decreases, the median value of delivered flow decreased.

Pulmonary Drug Delivery Following Continuous Vibrating Mesh Nebulization and Inspiratory Synchronized Vibrating Mesh Nebulization During Noninvasive Ventilation in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: A breath-synchronized nebulization option that could potentially improve drug delivery during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is currently not available on single-limb circuit bilevel ventilators. The aim of this study was to compare urinary excretion of amikacin following aerosol delivery with a vibrating mesh nebulizer coupled to a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, using conventional continuous (Conti-Neb) and experimental inspiratory synchronized (Inspi-Neb) nebulization modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A crossover clinical trial involving 6 noninvasive ventilated healthy volunteers (mean age of 32.3 ± 9.5 y) randomly assigned to both vibrating mesh nebulization modes was conducted: Inspi-Neb delivered aerosol during only the whole inspiratory phase, whereas Conti-Neb delivered aerosol continuously. All subjects inhaled amikacin solution (500 mg/4 mL) during NIPPV using a single-limb bilevel ventilator (inspiratory positive airway pressure: 12 cm H2O, and expiratory positive airway pressure: 5 cm H2O). Pulmonary drug delivery of amikacin following both nebulization modes was compared by urinary excretion of drug for 24 hours post-inhalation. RESULTS: The total daily amount of amikacin excreted in the urine was significantly higher with Inspi-Neb (median: 44.72 mg; interquartile range [IQR]: 40.50-65.13) than with Conti-Neb (median: 40.07 mg; IQR: 31.00-43.73), (p = 0.02). The elimination rate constant of amikacin (indirect measure of the depth of drug penetration into the lungs) was significantly higher with Inspi-Neb (median: 0.137; IQR: 0.113-0.146) than with Conti-Neb (median: 0.116; IQR: 0.105-0.130), (p = 0.02). However, the mean pulmonary drug delivery rate, expressed as the ratio between total daily urinary amount of amikacin and nebulization time, was significantly higher with Conti-Neb (2.03 mg/min) than with Inspi-Neb (1.09 mg/min) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During NIPPV with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, the use of inspiratory synchronized vibrating mesh nebulization may improve pulmonary drug delivery compared with conventional continuous vibrating mesh nebulization.

Aerosol Delivery with Two Nebulizers Through High-Flow Nasal Cannula: A Randomized Cross-Over Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography Study.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula use is developing in ICUs. The aim of this study was to compare aerosol efficiency by using two nebulizers through a high-flow nasal cannula: the most commonly used jet nebulizer (JN) and a more efficient vibrating-mesh nebulizer (VN). METHODS: Aerosol delivery of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (4 mCi/4 mL) to the lungs by using a VN (Aerogen Solo®; Aerogen Ltd., Galway, Ireland) and a constant-output JN (Opti-Mist Plus Nebulizer®; ConvaTec, Bridgewater, NJ) through a high-flow nasal cannula (Optiflow®; Fisher & Paykel, New Zealand) was compared in six healthy subjects. Flow rate was set at 30 L/min through the heated humidified circuit. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary deposition was measured by single-photon emission computed tomography combined with a low-dose computed tomographic scan and by planar scintigraphy. RESULTS: Lung deposition was only 3.6 (2.1-4.4) and 1 (0.7-2)% of the nominal dose with the VN and the JN, respectively (p < 0.05). The JN showed higher retained doses than the VN. However, both nebulizers were associated with substantial deposition in the single limb circuit, the humidification chamber, and the nasal cannula [58.2 (51.6-61.6)% of the nominal dose with the VN versus 19.2 (15.8-22.9)% of the nominal dose with the JN, p < 0.05] and in the upper respiratory tract [17.6 (13.4-27.9)% of the nominal dose with the VN and 8.6 (6.0-11.0)% of the nominal dose with the JN, p < 0.05], especially in the nasal cavity. CONCLUSIONS: In the specific conditions of the study, pulmonary drug delivery through the high-flow nasal cannula is about 1%-4% of the initial amount of drugs placed in the nebulizer, despite the higher efficiency of the VN as compared with the JN.

SPECT-CT Comparison of Lung Deposition using a System combining a Vibrating-mesh Nebulizer with a Valved Holding Chamber and a Conventional Jet Nebulizer: a Randomized Cross-over Study.

PURPOSE: To compare in vivo the total and regional pulmonary deposition of aerosol particles generated by a new system combining a vibrating-mesh nebulizer with a specific valved holding chamber and constant-output jet nebulizer connected to a corrugated tube. METHODS: Cross-over study comparing aerosol delivery to the lungs using two nebulizers in 6 healthy male subjects: a vibrating-mesh nebulizer combined with a valved holding chamber (Aerogen Ultra®, Aerogen Ltd., Galway, Ireland) and a jet nebulizer connected to a corrugated tube (Opti-Mist Plus Nebulizer®, ConvaTec, Bridgewater, NJ). Nebulizers were filled with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labelled with technetium-99 m (99mTc-DTPA, 2 mCi/4 mL). Pulmonary deposition of 99mTc-DTPA was measured by single-photon emission computed tomography combined with a low dose CT-scan (SPECT-CT). RESULTS: Pulmonary aerosol deposition from SPECT-CT analysis was six times increased with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer as compared to the jet nebulizer (34.1 ± 6.0% versus 5.2 ± 1.1%, p < 0.001). However, aerosol penetration expressed as the three-dimensional normalized ratio of the outer and the inner regions of the lungs was similar between both nebulizers. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the high superiority of the new system combining a vibrating-mesh nebulizer with a valved holding chamber to deliver nebulized particles into the lungs as comparted to a constant-output jet nebulizer with a corrugated tube.

Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilation and spontaneous ventilation in pressure support has never been performed. The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation, with two modes: pressure support ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation. METHODS: Seventeen postoperative neurosurgery patients without pulmonary disease were randomly ventilated in pressure support or volume-controlled ventilation. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (2 mCi/3 mL) was administrated using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo(®), provided by Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) connected to the endotracheal tube. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary particles deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy. RESULTS: Lung deposition was 10.5 ± 3.0 and 15.1 ± 5.0 % of the nominal dose during pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation, respectively (p < 0.05). Higher endotracheal tube and tracheal deposition was observed during pressure support ventilation (27.4 ± 6.6 vs. 20.7 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05). A similar penetration index was observed for the right (p = 0.210) and the left lung (p = 0.211) with both ventilation modes. A high intersubject variability of lung deposition was observed with both modes regarding lung doses, aerosol penetration and distribution between the right and the left lung. CONCLUSIONS: In the specific conditions of the study, volume-controlled ventilation was associated with higher lung deposition of nebulized particles as compared to pressure support ventilation. The clinical benefit of this effect warrants further studies. Clinical trial registration NCT01879488.

In Vitro Comparison of a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Operating in Inspiratory Synchronized and Continuous Nebulization Modes During Noninvasive Ventilation.

UNLABELLED: Backround: Coupling nebulization with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to be effective in patients with respiratory diseases. However, a breath-synchronized nebulization option that could potentially improve drug delivery by limiting drug loss during exhalation is currently not available on bilevel ventilators. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare aerosol delivery of amikacin with a vibrating mesh nebulizer coupled to a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, using conventional continuous (Conti-Neb) and experimental inspiratory synchronized (Inspi-Neb) nebulization modes. METHODS: Using an adult lung bench model of NIV, we tested a vibrating mesh device coupled with a bilevel ventilator in both nebulization modes. Inspi-Neb delivered aerosol only during the whole inspiratory phase, whereas Conti-Neb delivered aerosol continuously. The nebulizer was charged with amikacin solution (250 mg/3 mL) and placed at two different positions: between the lung and exhalation port and between the ventilator and exhalation port. Inhaled, expiratory wasted and circuit lost doses were assessed by residual gravimetric method. Particle size distribution of aerosol delivered at the outlet of the ventilator circuit during both nebulization modes was measured by laser diffraction method. RESULTS: Regardless of the nebulizer position, Inspi-Neb produced higher inhaled dose (p < 0.01; +6.3% to +16.8% of the nominal dose), lower expiratory wasted dose (p < 0.05; -2.7% to -42.6% of the nominal dose), and greater respirable dose (p < 0.01; +8.4% to +15.2% of the nominal dose) than Conti-Neb. The highest respirable dose was found with the nebulizer placed between the lung and exhalation port (48.7% ± 0.3% of the nominal dose). CONCLUSIONS: During simulated NIV with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, the use of inspiratory synchronized vibrating mesh nebulization improves respirable dose and reduces drug loss of amikacin compared with continuous vibrating mesh nebulization.

Influence of inspiratory flow pattern and nebulizer position on aerosol delivery with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation: an in vitro analysis.

BACKGROUND: Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) depends on nebulizer type, placement of the nebulizer and ventilator settings. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of two inspiratory flow patterns on amikacin delivery with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer placed at different positions on an adult lung model of IMV equipped with a proximal flow sensor (PFS). METHODS: IMV was simulated using a ventilator connected to a lung model through an 8-mm inner-diameter endotracheal tube. The impact of a decelerating and a constant flow pattern on aerosol delivery was evaluated in volume-controlled mode (tidal volume 500 mL, 20 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 1 sec, bias flow of 10 L/min). An amikacin solution (250 mg/3 mL) was nebulized with Aeroneb Solo(®) placed at five positions on the ventilator circuit equipped with a PFS: connected to the endotracheal tube (A), to the Y-piece (B), placed at 15 cm (C) and 45 cm upstream of the Y-piece (D), and placed at 15 cm of the inspiratory outlet of the ventilator (E). The four last positions were also tested without PFS. Deposited doses of amikacin were measured using the gravimetric residual method. RESULTS: Amikacin delivery was significantly reduced with a decelerating inspiratory flow pattern compared to a constant flow (p<0.05). With a constant inspiratory flow pattern, connecting the nebulizer to the endotracheal tube enabled similar deposited doses than these obtained when connecting the nebulizer close to the ventilator. The PFS reduced deposited doses only when the nebulizer was connected to the Y-piece with both flow patterns or placed at 15 cm of the Y-piece with a constant inspiratory flow (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using similar tidal volume and inspiratory time, a constant flow pattern (30 L/min) delivers a higher amount of amikacin through an endotracheal tube compared to a decelerating inspiratory flow pattern (peak inspiratory flow around 60 L/min). The optimal nebulizer position depends on the inspiratory flow pattern and the presence of a PFS.

In vitro comparison of five nebulizers during noninvasive ventilation: analysis of inhaled and lost doses.

BACKGROUND: Few studies on performance comparison of nebulizer systems coupled with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator are available. Most of these data compared the aerosol drug delivery for only two different systems. Using an adult lung bench model of noninvasive ventilation, we compared inhaled and lost doses of three nebulizer systems coupled with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, as well as the influence of the nebulizer position. METHOD: Three vibrating mesh nebulizers (Aeroneb(®) Pro, Aeroneb(®) Solo, and NIVO(®)), one jet nebulizer (Sidestream(®)), and one ultrasonic nebulizer (Servo Ultra Nebulizer 145(®)) coupled with a bilevel ventilator were tested. They were charged with amikacin solution (500 mg/4 mL) and operated at two different positions: before and after the exhalation port (starting from the lung). The inhaled dose, the expiratory wasted dose, and the estimated lost dose were assessed by the residual gravimetric method. RESULTS: The doses varied widely among the nebulizer types and position. When the nebulizer was positioned before the exhalation port, the vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered the highest inhaled dose (p<0.001), the jet nebulizer the highest expiratory wasted dose (p<0.001), and the ultrasonic device the highest total lost dose (p<0.001). When the nebulizer was positioned after the exhalation port, the vibrating mesh nebulizers delivered the highest inhaled (p<0.001) and expiratory wasted doses (p<0.001), and the ultrasonic device the highest total lost dose (p<0.001). The most efficient nebulizers were NIVO and Aeroneb Solo when placed before the exhalation port. CONCLUSIONS: In a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, vibrating mesh nebulizers positioned between the exhalation port and lung model are more efficient for drug delivery compared with jet or ultrasonic nebulizers. In this position, the improved efficiency of vibrating mesh nebulizers was due to an increase in the inhaled dose and a reduction in the exhaled wasted dose compared with placement between the ventilator and the expiratory port. Because of the high total lost dose, the ultrasonic device should not be recommended. Nebulizer placement before the exhalation port increased the inhaled dose and decreased the expiratory wasted dose, except for the jet nebulizer.

Non-invasive ventilation in the recovery room for postoperative respiratory failure: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has become a standard of care in acute respiratory failure. However, little data is available on its usefulness in recovery ward patients after general surgery. The present study aimed to document the feasibility of implementing NIV in this setting, and its impact on lung function. METHODS: During a 12-month period, all adult patients who underwent elective general surgical procedures under general anaesthesia during weekdays, were transferred to the recovery ward after extubation, and those who required NIV were included in this prospective observational study. NIV was applied with a bilevel device (VPAP II ST, ResMed, North Ryde, Australia). RESULTS: 4622 patients were admitted to the recovery ward, 83 of whom needed NIV. NIV increased pH (7.38 +/- .06 vs 7.30 +/- .05), reduced PaCO2 (7.38 +/- .06 vs 7.30 +/- .05) in hypercapnic patients (44 +/- 9 vs 55 +/- 10 mm Hg), and increased PaO2 in non-hypercapnic patients (80 +/- 10 vs 70 +/- 11 mm Hg). No complications attributable to NIV occurred. Most patients improved after 1-2 NIV trials, and all were transferred to the ward the same day. CONCLUSIONS: In recovery ward patients after general surgery, NIV is seldom required. When applied, NIV seems to exert favourable effects on lung function. NIV can be safely implemented with a bilevel device in a recovery ward not accustomed to the use of ICU ventilators. The cost-effectiveness of its systematic use in this setting should be assessed.

Performance characteristics of 10 home mechanical ventilators in pressure-support mode: a comparative bench study.

OBJECTIVE: Inspiratory pressure (Pi) support delivered by a bilevel device has become the technique of choice for noninvasive home ventilation. Considerable progress has been made in the performance and functionality of these devices. The present bench study was designed to compare the various characteristics of 10 recently developed bilevel Pi devices under different conditions of respiratory mechanics. DESIGN: Bench model study. SETTING: Research laboratory, university hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Ventilators were connected to a lung model, the mechanics of which were set to normal, restrictive, and obstructive, that was driven by an ICU ventilator to mimic patient effort. Pressure support levels of 10 and 15 cm H(2)O, and maximum were tested, with "patient" inspiratory efforts of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm H(2)O. Tests were conducted in the absence and presence of leaks in the system. Trigger delay, trigger-associated inspiratory workload, pressurization capabilities, and cycling were analyzed. RESULTS: All devices had very short trigger delays and triggering workload. Pressurization capability varied widely among the machines, with some bilevel devices lagging behind when faced with a high inspiratory demand. Cycling was usually not synchronous with patient inspiratory time when the default settings were used, but was considerably improved by modifying cycling settings, when that option was available. CONCLUSIONS: A better knowledge of the technical performance of bilevel devices (ie, pressurization capabilities and cycling profile) may prove to be useful in choosing the machine that is best suited for a patient's respiratory mechanics and inspiratory demand. Clinical algorithms to help set cycling criteria for improving patient-ventilator synchrony and patient comfort should now be developed.

Expiratory trigger setting in pressure support ventilation: from mathematical model to bedside.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of relying on a mathematical model to adjust the optimal level of expiratory trigger, materialized by the ratio of inspiratory flow at the end of inspiratory effort (V'ti) and peak inspiratory flow (V'peak), or V'ti/V'peak, during pressure support, by comparing its predicted values with those measured in intubated patients. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit, university hospital. PATIENTS: There were 28 intubated patients undergoing pressure support. INTERVENTIONS: Pressure support as set by the clinician in charge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between predicted and measured V'ti/V'peak ratios (r =.70; p <.001; mean +/- sd difference, -0.025 +/- 0.07; 95% confidence interval, -0.161 to 0.111). Overall, delayed cycling occurred in obstructive conditions, the delay increasing as obstructive disease was more severe. CONCLUSIONS: A significant correlation was observed between predicted values of V'ti/V'peak and those values measured in patients undergoing pressure support. These findings should stimulate further research into the possible applications of this mathematical model to optimize expiratory trigger setting. Furthermore, our findings suggest that expiratory trigger should be adjustable and provide a wider range of cutoff levels than that which is currently available.