Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 39(5): e392-e396, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30589679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The survival of Fassier-Duval (FD) telescoping rods as compared with static implants in children affected by osteogenesis imperfecta is not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to compare risk of lower extremity implant failure in FD rods versus static implants. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients with osteogenesis imperfecta who underwent surgical treatment using either FD rods or static implants (Rush rods, flexible nails, or Steinmann pins) between 1995 and 2015. The timing of implant failure was the primary outcome variable of interest. Comparisons were limited to limbs with no previous history of implants. Cox-proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare the hazard of implant failure across implants. Negative binomial regression analyses were used to compare the incidence of surgical procedures in the 2 implant groups. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 64 limbs (n=21 patients). The static implant group (n=38) consisted of 24 Rush rods (63%), 14 flexible nails (37%), and 2 Steinmann pins (5%). The hazard of implant failure in the static implant group was 13.2 times [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.5-69.6; P=0.0024] the hazard of implant failure in the FD rod group. The hazard of implant failure among females was 4.8 (95% CI, 1.4-16.7; P=0.0125) times the hazard of implant failure among males. The total surgery rate in the static implant group was 7.8 (95% CI, 1.8-33.0; P=0.0056) times the total surgery rate in the FD group. CONCLUSIONS: Among surgically naive limbs, FD rods were associated with significantly improved probability of survival compared with static implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-retrospective study.


Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Equipment Failure/statistics & numerical data , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 28(11): e250-7, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24694556

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of repair or reconstruction of high-energy, open knee extensor disruption or loss due to combat-related injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary (Level/Role V) Military Treatment Facility. PATIENTS: Fourteen consecutive patients who sustained 17 complex, open knee extensor mechanism injuries during combat operations between March 2003 and May 2012. INTERVENTION: Primary repair or staged allograft extensor reconstruction after serial debridement and closure or soft tissue coverage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Final knee range of motion, extensor lag, ambulatory ability and assist devices, and complications requiring reoperation or salvage procedure. RESULTS: The open knee extensor mechanism injuries required a mean of 11 procedures per injury. At a mean final follow-up of 39 months (range, 12-89 months), all patients achieved regular community ambulation, with 36% requiring assist devices due to concomitant or bilateral injuries. Average knee flexion was 92 degrees, and 35% of extremities had an extensor lag >10 degrees; however, 6 of 9 extremities with allograft reconstructions had extensor lags of <10 degrees, and 5 had no extensor lag. The presence of a major periarticular or patellar fracture was significantly associated with the knee requiring a subsequent extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction procedure. One extremity each underwent knee arthrodesis or transfemoral amputation due to severe infection. CONCLUSIONS: High-energy, open knee extensor mechanism injuries are severe and rarely occur in isolation, but limb salvage is generally successful after multiple procedures. Patients who required staged allograft reconstruction, despite high complication rates, generally had favorable results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level IV. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/methods , Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Arthroplasty/methods , Blast Injuries/surgery , Knee Injuries/surgery , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Salvage Therapy/methods , Adult , Blast Injuries/diagnosis , Female , Fractures, Open , Humans , Knee Injuries/diagnosis , Male , Military Personnel , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Soft Tissue Injuries/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Warfare , Young Adult
4.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 45(6): 360-5, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17145460

ABSTRACT

Prophylactic ankle taping has been considered the mainstay of ankle injury prevention and has been used at all levels of competitive football. An alternative to taping is a semirigid ankle orthosis. This study prospectively compared the incidence of ankle sprains in high school football players during a single season, after randomization to either prophylactic bracing or taping of both ankles. Of 83 athletes followed up for an entire season, 6 ankle sprains occurred, 3 in each treatment group; and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of ankle sprains between the 2 groups. The time required to tape an athlete averaged 67 seconds per ankle, resulting in a total of 97 minutes per ankle during an entire season, and the average cost to tape each ankle during an entire season was greater than the cost of the commercially available brace. The projected cost savings for an athletic program using prophylactic bracing could be substantial when compared with the use of prophylactic taping of the ankle.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Bandages , Braces , Football/injuries , Sprains and Strains/prevention & control , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Bandages/economics , Braces/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , Prospective Studies , Students , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...