Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes.

Background: Individuals who rely on wheelchairs, walkers, and crutches for ambulation have an increased incidence of rotator cuff tears due to altered shoulder biomechanics and increased force transmission across the shoulder joint. The purpose of our study is to review our longitudinal outcomes treating upper extremity ambulators to guide patient expectations and identify risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure. Methods: A total of fifteen patients were included after a cohort of thirty-nine patients were identified. The mean age was 54.9 years at the time of index rotator cuff repair, with each patient requiring either wheelchair, cane, walker, or crutches for ambulation. Clinical outcomes were measured (strength, range of motion, and pain scores), and patient-reported outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California Los Angeles functional shoulder assessment tool) were obtained. No follow-up imaging was obtained unless indicated by a change in clinical status. Results: Within our cohort, 14 of 15 (93%) presented with supraspinatus tears, 7 of 15 (47%) with infraspinatus tears, and only 3 of 15 (20%) with subscapularis pathology. Additionally, the rates of concurrent biceps pathology or acromioclavicular joint pathology were significant at 53% and 73%, respectively. Only one patient in our cohort experienced known failure of cuff repair, despite longitudinal follow-up at an average of 97 months following surgery, however, routine follow-up imaging was not obtained. There were statistically significant improvements in visual analog scale pain scores, forward flexion ROM and strength, and abduction ROM. Additionally, statistically significant improvements were noted in all patient-reported outcome scores measured. Conclusion: Despite the apparent risks associated in rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators, these patients demonstrate clinically significant improvements following surgery. Appreciating additional pathology beyond the rotator cuff is important in formulating a treatment plan.

Entrapment of the Extensor Indicis Proprius Tendon after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Ulna: Case Report and Discussion of the Diagnosis and Surgical Result.

Entrapment of the extensor indicis proprius (EIP) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the distal ulna with a plate and screw construct is rare. By literature review, we found evidence of such complication associated with distal radius fracture, but no past reports relating to the distal ulna. ORIF of the distal ulna is a common procedure for both fracture treatment and deformity correction. Due to the EIP muscle originating primarily from the dorsoradial surface of the distal ulna and the adjacent interosseous membrane, the muscle may be damaged or compressed by a fixation plate during ORIF, resulting in entrapment. We present two case reports of this rare complication, describing the method of clinical diagnosis, surgical treatment, and outcome. Our accompanying cadaver dissection provides an explanation for proper plate positioning during ORIF of the ulna to reduce the risk of EIP entrapment.

Outcomes of shoulder replacement in humeral head avascular necrosis.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective review evaluated 25 patients with 29 shoulders treated with arthroplasty for humeral head avascular necrosis (HHAVN) between 2004 and 2015. We hypothesized that regardless of implant, radiographic stage, or etiology, patients would appreciate significant improvement in pain, range of motion, and shoulder functionality after surgical intervention. METHODS: Data were obtained by record review on all patients meeting inclusion criteria. Outcomes were evaluated using Simple Shoulder Test, Modified Constant Score, University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form. The data were assessed by all patients and subcategories (treatment, avascular necrosis stage, and underlying cause). RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 3.9 years (range, 1-8.5 years), all patients who underwent operative intervention for HHAVN showed statistically significant improvement in functionality measurements (P < .01). Patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) noted higher median outcome scores and greater improvement in all scoring methods compared with their hemiarthroplasty counterparts. The high-stage disease shoulders showed similar trends over low-stage counterparts. The shoulders in the trauma causal group had the highest scores in 3 of 4 outcome measures and favorable change in all scoring methods. These differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). No revision arthroplasties were required. Minor complications (suture abscess and intraoperative calcar fracture requiring cabling) occurred in 2 TSA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our outcomes demonstrate that in the short- to midterm follow-up, TSA or hemiarthroplasty is a safe and equally effective treatment for patients diagnosed with HHAVN regardless of etiology and radiographic staging.

Influence of preoperative opioid use on postoperative outcomes and opioid use after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Recent orthopedic research has questioned the effect of opioid use on surgical outcomes. This study investigated this in the context of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We hypothesized that preoperative opioid use would be associated with inferior outcomes and greater postoperative opioid requirements. METHODS: A database query identified adult patients with full-thickness or partial-thickness supraspinatus tears surgically treated between 2011 and 2015. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes scores (active range of motion [AROM], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Constant scores, Simple Shoulder Test [SST], and visual analog scale [VAS] for pain) and postoperative opioid use were retrospectively recorded. Patients with less than 2 years of follow-up data at the time of the retrospective review were contacted for prospective ASES, SST, and VAS data collection. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients, 44 of whom received opioids preoperatively, were identified for inclusion. Patients prescribed preoperative opioids had consistently inferior preoperative and postoperative outcomes scores; however, the magnitudes of improvement were not significantly different between groups. Postoperatively, patients in the preoperative opioid group received 1.91 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.78) times more opioids over a postoperative course of treatment that was 2.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.62-4.59) times longer. In addition to having a greater proportion of women, this group also had significantly higher rates of certain comorbidities, including back pain, depression, degenerative joint disease, and chronic pain conditions. CONCLUSIONS: All patients demonstrated significant improvements in outcomes scores after surgical repair that were not significantly different between groups. However, patients taking opioids preoperatively did not ultimately reach the same level of functionality and had substantially greater opioid requirements postoperatively.

The "Thumbs-up" sign and trapeziometacarpal joint injection: a useful clinical indicator.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical studies investigating the accuracy and efficacy of trapeziometacarpal injection exist. Some studies utilize anatomical landmarks for proper injection placement while others utilize modalities including ultrasound and fluoroscopy. The changes of limb position that occur at the time of intra-articular injection can provide valuable visual and tactile feedback to the clinician. The purpose of this study is to investigate the occurrence of the "Thumbs-up" sign with injection of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint as a useful and reliable clinical indicator of intra-articular trapeziometacarpal injection and correlate level and duration of pain relief. METHODS: Trapeziometacarpal joint injections were performed on twenty-seven thumbs utilizing anatomic landmarks. At the time of injection, the presence or absence of the "Thumbs-up" sign was noted, and needle location was verified after injection with orthogonal mini-C arm fluoroscopic images. Visual analog pain scale scores were obtained pre-injection and by follow-up telephone calls at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months post injection. RESULTS: Twenty-four of twenty-seven injections demonstrated a positive "Thumbs-up" sign. There were three negative "Thumbs-Up" injections. The thumbs-up sign demonstrated a 92.3 % sensitivity. Eighteen of twenty-seven thumbs had sustained relief at 3 months post injection. CONCLUSIONS: The "Thumbs-up" sign is a practical clinical tool that gives the practitioner important visual feedback at the time of injection. Patient relaxation and joint compliance are limiting factors. The "Thumbs-up" sign is an inexpensive indicator of successful intra-articular injection and may obviate the need and expense of advanced imaging modalities at the time of injection.