Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Screen ; 27(3): 121-129, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31801039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Netherlands host three population-based cancer screening programmes: for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer. For screening programmes to be effective, high participation rates are essential, but participation in the Netherlands' programmes is starting to fall below the minimal effective rate. We aimed to produce a systematic overview of the current known determinants of (non-)attendance at the Dutch cancer screening programmes. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the electronic databases Academic Search Premier, Cochrane Library, Embase, EMCare, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and also in grey literature, including all articles published before February 2018. The I-Change model was used to categorize the identified determinants of cancer screening attendance. RESULTS: In total, 19/1232 identified studies and 6 grey literature reports were included. Fifteen studies reported on predisposing factors. Characteristics such as social economic status, country of birth, and residency were most often reported, and correlate with cancer screening attendance. Thirteen studies addressed information factors. Factors on awareness, motivation, ability, and barriers were less often studied. CONCLUSION: Current studies tend to describe the general characteristics of (non-)attendance and (non-)attenders, but rarely provide in depth information on other factors of (non-)participation. The I-Change model proved to be a useful tool in mapping current knowledge on cancer screening attendance and revealed knowledge gaps regarding determinants of (non-)participation in the screening programmes. More research is needed to fully understand determinants of participation, in order to influence and optimize attendance rates over the long term.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Attitude to Health , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
3.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 13: 8, 2013 Feb 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23442875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level may be used for screening for type 2 diabetes and prediabetes instead of a more burdensome oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, among the high-risk South Asian population, little is known about the overlap of the methods or about the metabolic profiles of those disconcordantly diagnosed. METHODS: We included 944 South Asians (18-60 years old), whom we screened with the HbA1c level and the OGTT in The Hague, the Netherlands. We calculated the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUROC) with a 95% confidence interval of HbA1c using the American Diabetes Association classifications, and determined the sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals at different thresholds. Moreover, we studied differences in metabolic characteristics between those identified by HbA1c and by the OGTT alone. RESULTS: The overlap between HbA1c and OGTT classifications was partial, both for diabetes and prediabetes. The AUROC of HbA1c for OGTT defined diabetes was 0.86 (0.79-0.93). The sensitivity was 0.46 (0.29-0.63); the specificity 0.98 (0.98-0.99). For prediabetes, the AUROC was 0.73 (0.69-0.77). Each of the 31 individuals with diabetes and 353 with prediabetes identified with the HbA1c level had a high body mass index, large waist circumference, high blood pressure, and low insulin sensitivity, all of which were similar to the values shown by those among the 19 with diabetes or 62 with prediabetes who only met the OGTT criteria, but not the HbA1c criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The HbA1c level identified a partially different group than the OGTT did. However, both those identified with the HbA1c level and those identified with the OGTT alone were at increased metabolic risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register: NTR1499.

4.
Internet resource in English | LIS -Health Information Locator | ID: lis-4777

ABSTRACT

Cause-specific information on socioeconomic differences in health is necessary for a rational public health policy. At the local level, the Municipal Health Service studies these differences in order to support the authorities in policy making. Methods Mortality data of the under 65 age group in The Hague were analyzed (1982-1991) at residential area level. Causes of death with a high socioeconomic gradient among males were: homicide, chronic liver disease, 'other' external causes of injury, diabetes, bronchitis, emphysema and asthma, and motor vehicle accidents; and among females: diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, 'other' diseases of the circulatory system, signs, symptoms and ill-defined conditions, malignant neoplasm of cervix, and 'other' diseases.(Sign-in/subscription is necessary for full-text))


Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Mortality , Socioeconomic Factors , Health Equity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...