ABSTRACT
Objective: Serious gaming is an upcoming and promising tool in prevention and health promotion. The aim of this experimental study was to examine whether health-related serious gaming could optimize food-related outcomes and physical activity.Design: Eighty-one healthy participants (80% female) were randomly allocated to an experimental condition, in which participants played serious games based on transferring information, priming and evaluative conditioning, for half an hour, or a control condition, in which participants played non-health-related computer games.Main outcome measures: The primary study outcome was self-reported food preference and self-reported food choice, assessed by the Food Choice Task with food pairs differing in healthiness, or in both healthiness and attractiveness. Secondary outcomes were actual food choice and physical activity.Results: A significantly healthier food preference for pairs differing in healthiness was found on the Food Choice Task in the experimental compared to the control condition. No significant differences were found on the other outcomes.Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the effects of serious gaming based on optimizing food preferences. More research is needed to confirm the present findings and to further elucidate and optimize the effects of serious gaming on health behaviours.
Subject(s)
Diet, Healthy/psychology , Food Preferences , Health Promotion/methods , Video Games/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young AdultABSTRACT
Short stress management interventions such as relaxation therapy have demonstrated preliminary effectiveness in reducing stress-related problems. A promising tool to strengthen the effectiveness of relaxation-based interventions is the use of verbal suggestions, as previous research provided evidence that verbal suggestions can induce positive outcome expectancies, facilitate adaptive responses to stress and improve health outcomes. The present experimental proof-of-concept study aimed to investigate the effects of a brief relaxation intervention and specifically the role of verbal suggestions on stress-related outcomes assessed by self-report questionnaires and psychophysiological data. 120 participants (mean age = 22.1 years) were randomized to one of four intervention conditions: a brief relaxation intervention plus verbal suggestions condition, a brief relaxation intervention only condition, a verbal suggestions only condition, and a control condition. Afterwards, participants were subjected to a psychosocial stress challenge to assess reactivity to a stressful event. Immediately after both relaxation interventions (with and without verbal suggestions), lower self-reported state anxiety was found compared to the control condition, but no differences were observed in response to the stressor. The verbal suggestions only condition did not impact state anxiety. No significant effects were found for verbal suggestion interventions on cortisol, alpha amylase, heart rate and skin conductance. This is the first study investigating the role of verbal suggestions in the effectiveness of a brief relaxation intervention. Although this experimental proof-of-concept study provides support for the effectiveness of a brief relaxation intervention in lowering state anxiety directly after the intervention, the effects did not impact the response to a subsequent stressor and we did not observe any evidence for the add-on effectiveness of verbal suggestions. The effectiveness of brief relaxation interventions on stress responses should be investigated further in future research by incorporating interventions that are tailored to the specific stress challenge and various types of verbal suggestions.
Subject(s)
Relaxation Therapy/methods , Suggestion , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/metabolism , Anxiety/physiopathology , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/therapy , Female , Galvanic Skin Response , Heart Rate , Humans , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Male , Saliva/metabolism , Self Report , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , alpha-Amylases/metabolismABSTRACT
There is initial support for the effectiveness of approach-avoidance trainings in altering food-related health behaviors. Furthermore, outcome expectancies induced by verbal suggestions might optimize the effectiveness of these interventions, as shown in placebo research. The present study investigated the effectiveness of a gamified approach-avoidance training on food-related outcomes and whether verbal suggestions could strengthen those effects. A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions: serious gaming only, verbal suggestions only, serious gaming combined with verbal suggestions, or a gaming control condition. Virtual food preference and food choice were assessed with a food choice task, with pairs differing in healthiness or in healthiness and attractiveness. Implicit food preference was assessed with an Implicit Association Test and food intake with a bogus taste test. Participants in both serious gaming conditions made healthier food choices for pairs differing in healthiness and attractiveness and had healthier implicit food preferences compared to gaming control. No effects were found on food intake. These findings provide the first preliminary support for the effects of a gamified approach-avoidance training on virtual food choice and implicit food preference. Future studies should further elucidate these effects, also in other health domains such as physical activity.
