Steady-state plasma concentration profile of transdermal rotigotine: an integrated analysis of three, open-label, randomized, phase I multiple dose studies.

BACKGROUND: The dopamine agonist rotigotine is formulated in a transdermal delivery system (patch) for once-daily application. It has been reported as efficacious in the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and restless legs syndrome. OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the results of 3 clinical studies conducted to characterize the 24-hour pharmacokinetic profile of rotigotine in steady state and the effect of different patch application sites on this profile. In addition, the relative bioavailability of a single, large patch versus 2 smaller patches was assessed. METHODS: One Phase I study (SP871) assessed the steady-state pharmacokinetic properties at different application sites at a rotigotine maintenance dose of 3 mg/24 hours in healthy participants. Due to tolerability issues, the steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of rotigotine at higher doses (8 mg/24 hours) was assessed in 2 Phase I studies (SP630, SP651) in early-stage PD patients. Relative rotigotine bioavailability from a 40 cm(2) patch versus 2 × 20 cm(2) patches (SP651) and from a 15 cm(2) patch versus 1 × 5 cm(2) + 1 × 10 cm(2) patches (SP871) was also evaluated. Rotigotine concentrations in plasma were analyzed using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The pharmacokinetic variables were calculated using standard noncompartmental analysis. RESULTS: Release of rotigotine to the skin was 31% to 62% of total drug content in the patch. Variability of rotigotine exposure was low within participants (15%) compared with the variability observed between participants (54%). Rotigotine exposure increased proportionally in the therapeutic dose range of 2 mg/24 hours to 8 mg/24 hours. Plasma concentrations at steady state were stable over the 24-hour patch-on period. Delivery via a single, large patch compared with a combination of smaller patches did not appear to influence exposure to rotigotine. Bioavailability showed some variability depending on patch application site (hip, shoulder, abdomen, flank, thigh, upper arm); the respective mean ratios for AUC ranged between 0.87 (abdomen vs flank) and 1.46 (shoulder vs thigh). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous rotigotine delivery via a once-daily transdermal patch generated stable mean steady-state 24-hour plasma concentrations in healthy participants as well as patients with early-stage PD. Doses were achieved either by application of 1 large patch or a combination of smaller patches, resulting in the same total surface area.

Insulin glulisine imparts effective glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Insulin glulisine (glulisine) was evaluated versus regular human insulin (RHI) in Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. METHODS: Patients previously on >6 months' continuous insulin treatment aged >or=18 years in a randomized, multinational, controlled, open-label, parallel group, 26-week study received twice-daily NPH insulin and either glulisine (0-15 min before breakfast and dinner; n=448) or RHI (30-45 min before breakfast and dinner; n=442) at least twice daily. RESULTS: Mean baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no differences in baseline to endpoint HbA(1c) reductions (glulisine: -0.32%; RHI: -0.35%; p=0.5726), and the non-inferiority of glulisine versus RHI was demonstrated (difference in adjusted mean change 0.03%; 95% CI: -0.07, 0.13). Postprandially, glulisine lowered plasma glucose significantly more versus RHI at 2h (14.14 mmol/L versus 15.28 mmol/L; p=0.0025) and excursions at 1h (3.99 versus 4.59; p=0.0151) and 2h (4.87 versus 6.03; p=0.0002). No between-group differences occurred in the frequencies and monthly rates of all symptomatic hypoglycaemia; nocturnal hypoglycaemia from Month 4 to treatment end was less frequent with glulisine versus RHI (9.1% versus 14.5%; p=0.029). CONCLUSION: Glulisine was non-inferior to RHI in reducing HbA(1c) in T2DM. Glulisine demonstrated superior postprandial glucose control and was associated with fewer nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes, indicating clinical benefits.

Comparable efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy in asthma, but local and systemic side effects and adherence remain a concern. Ciclesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid with on-site lung activation that provides potent anti-inflammatory activity and has been shown to have a good safety profile, even at high doses. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily ciclesonide versus twice-daily fluticasone propionate at comparable daily doses in patients with asthma. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, 529 patients were randomized to ciclesonide 160 microg once daily or fluticasone propionate 88 microg twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in lung function. RESULTS: Both ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate significantly improved forced expiratory volume in 1s, forced vital capacity, and morning peak expiratory flow compared with baseline (p<0.0001 for all variables). Both medications reduced asthma symptoms and rescue medication use within the first 24 h. At the tested dose, both medications were equally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Ciclesonide 160 microg once daily was as effective as fluticasone propionate 88 microg twice daily in improving lung function and asthma symptoms, and in reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.

A randomized evaluation of the effects of six antipsychotic agents on QTc, in the absence and presence of metabolic inhibition.

Many drugs have been associated with QTc prolongation and, in some cases, this is augmented by concomitant administration with metabolic inhibitors. The effects of 6 antipsychotics on the QTc interval at and around the time of estimated peak plasma/serum concentrations in the absence and presence of metabolic inhibition were characterized in a prospective, randomized study in which patients with psychotic disorders reached steady-state on either haloperidol 15 mg/d (n = 27), thioridazine 300 mg/d (n = 30), ziprasidone 160 mg/d (n = 31), quetiapine 750 mg/d (n = 27), olanzapine 20 mg/d (n = 24), or risperidone 6-8 mg/d increased to 16 mg/d (n = 25/20). Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were done at estimated Cmax at steady-state on both antipsychotic monotherapy and after concomitant administration of appropriate cytochrome P-450 (CYP450) inhibitor(s). Mean QTc intervals did not exceed 500 milliseconds in any patient taking any of the antipsychotics studied, in the absence or presence of metabolic inhibition. The mean QTc interval change was greatest in the thioridazine group, both in the presence and absence of metabolic inhibition. The presence of metabolic inhibition did not significantly augment QTc prolongation associated with any agent. Each of the antipsychotics studied was associated with measurable QTc prolongation at steady-state peak plasma concentrations, which was not augmented by metabolic inhibition. The theoretical risk of cardiotoxicity associated with QTc prolongation should be balanced against the substantial clinical benefits associated with atypical antipsychotics and the likelihood of other toxicities.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ipratropium Bromide plus Fenoterol via Respimat((R)) Soft Misttrade mark Inhaler (SMI) versus a Pressurised Metered-Dose Inhaler in Asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Respimat((R)) Soft Misttrade mark Inhaler (SMI) is a novel, propellant-free device that significantly increases lung deposition compared with pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/fenoterol hydrobromide (IB/FEN; Berodual((R))) delivered via Respimat((R)) SMI and via a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-driven pMDI (CFC-MDI) in patients with asthma. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel- group study. PATIENTS: 631 patients (18-65 years old) with stable asthma. INTERVENTIONS: After a 2-week run-in period (IB/FEN 20mug/50mug via CFC-MDI, two actuations four times a day), patients were randomised to 12 weeks' treatment with one of five treatments: IB/FEN 10mug/25mug, 20mug/50mug or placebo via Respimat((R)) SMI (one actuation four times a day), or IB/FEN 20mug/50mug or placebo via CFC-MDI (two actuations four times a day). The main efficacy measure was lung function (assessed on days 1, 29, 57 and 85); safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: Bronchodilator responses to IB/FEN were much greater than those to placebo (mean peak increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] on day 85: 0.498-0.521L, active treatment; 0.215 and 0.240L, placebo). According to the primary endpoint, i.e. the average change in FEV(1) from test-day baseline over the 6 hours after dosing on day 85, neither IB/FEN dosage via Respimat((R)) SMI was inferior to IB/FEN via pMDI (p < 0.001). Non-inferiority of the two Respimat((R)) SMI dosages was supported by analyses of other lung function measures, e.g. average change in FEV(1) from test-day baseline over the 6 hours after dosing on the other 3 test days, and peak FEV(1) on all test days. Overall, the safety profile of IB/FEN via Respimat((R)) SMI was comparable to that via CFC-MDI. CONCLUSION: IB/FEN from Respimat((R)) SMI is as effective and safe as from CFC-MDI and enables a 2- to 4-fold daily dose reduction of IB/FEN.