DIFFERENCES IN MANAGEMENT AND PROGNOSTICATION OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK PATIENTS IN THE PRESENCE AND ABSENCE OF OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST.

ABSTRACT: Background: The clinical spectrum of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) varies. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) can be the first sign of cardiac failure, whereas others present with various degrees of hemodynamic instability (non-OHCA). The aim of the present study was to explore differences in prehospital management and characteristics of survivors and nonsurvivors in AMICS patients with OHCA or non-OHCA. Methods: Data analysis was based on patient data from the RETROSHOCK cohort comprising consecutive AMICS patients admitted to two tertiary cardiac centers between 2010 and 2017. Results: 1,716 AMICS patients were included and 42% presented with OHCA. Mortality in OHCA patients was 47% versus 57% in the non-OHCA group. Almost all OHCA patients were intubated before admission (96%). In the non-OHCA group, prehospital intubation (25%) was associated with a better survival ( P < 0.001). Lactate level on admission demonstrated a linear relationship with mortality in OHCA patients. In non-OHCA, probability of death was higher for any given lactate level <12 mmol/L compared with OHCA. However, a lactate level >7 mmol/L in non-OHCA did not increase mortality odds any further. Conclusion: Mortality was almost doubled for any admission lactate level up to 7 mmol/L in non-OHCA patients. Above this level, mortality remained unchanged in non-OHCA patients but continued to increase in OHCA patients. Prehospital intubation was performed in almost all OHCA patients but only in one of four patients without OHCA. Early intubation in non-OHCA patients was associated with a better outcome.

Communication between general practitioners and the emergency medical dispatch centre in urgent cases.

INTRODUCTION: When general practitioners (GPs) order an ambulance, their calls are handled by staff at the emergency medical dispatch centre (EMDC) who then select an appropriate response. There are currently no data evaluating this mode of communication between the GPs and the staff at the EMDC. 
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed based on evaluation of calls during which GPs requested a rapid response ambulance. Over a period of three months of 2014, 1,334 calls were included for evaluation according to specific parameters including a transactional analysis of the communication. 
RESULTS: We found problematic communication in less than 2% (n = 25) of the evaluated calls. In 68% of the 25 problematic cases transactional analysis showed that the staff at the EMDC initiated the problematic communication. In 4% (n = 51) of the calls, the GP delegated the call to a secretary or nurse, and we found that these calls were more likely to contain problematic communication (odds ratio = 5.1). In 18% (n = 236) of the cases, there was not sufficient information to assess if the physician-manned mobile emergency care unit (MECU) should have been dispatched along with the ambulance. 
CONCLUSIONS: Problematic communication is rare, occurring in less than 2% of the calls. Problems are more frequent when the GP delegates the call. Furthermore, we established that the communicative problems were more likely to be initiated by the staff at the EMDC than by the GP. In addition, we found that there was insufficient information to assess if the MECU should be dispatched in nearly 20% of all calls.
 FUNDING: none.
 TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (ref. no. 2008-58-0035). Informed consent from individual patients or ethics committee approval was not required since it was a register-based study solely and no person-identifiable data were used.

Musculoskeletal Dysfunctions in Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal dysfunctions based on a standardized clinical examination of patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) who were referred to a specialized tertiary care center for laparoscopic examination. In addition, we stratified levels of self-reported pelvic pain, self-rated health, education, and work status based on musculoskeletal dysfunction status. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal dysfunctions in women with CPP who were referred to a tertiary care center specializing in care of women with CPP. The women completed a questionnaire and underwent a blinded systematic objective clinical examination of the musculoskeletal system by a doctor of chiropractic who then categorized the patients as having or not having musculoskeletal dysfunction. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients returned the questionnaire, completed the clinical examination, and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. More than half of the referred patients with CPP (48 out of 94) had musculoskeletal dysfunctions in the lumbar/pelvic region. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups with respect to self-rated health, education, work status, and pain level. Pain location was significantly different after Bonferroni correction in 1 out of the 36 aspects. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of CPP patients, 51% were categorized as having a musculoskeletal dysfunction. Overall, CPP patients were similar with respect to certain characteristics, such as age, body mass index, and pain level, regardless of their classification; however, patients with musculoskeletal dysfunction tended to report more pain in the front and back of the lower limbs.