Luminal Breast Cancer: Risk of Recurrence and Tumor-Associated Immune Suppression.

Hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) (including the luminal A and the luminal B subtypes) is the most common type of tumor in women diagnosed with early-stage BC (EBC). It represents a highly heterogeneous subgroup that is characterized by different risks of relapse. The aim of this review is to discuss the possible role played by the immune response in predicting this risk, along with the most common clinical and pathological factors and molecular tools that have been developed and are already in use. As opposed to what has previously been observed in the most aggressive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes, a high proportion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)-reflecting a spontaneous and pre-existing immune response to the tumor-has been linked to a worse prognosis in HR+ EBC. This work provides some immune biological rationale explaining these findings and provides the basics to understand the principal clinical trials that are testing immunotherapy in HR+ (luminal) BC.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Pancreatic Injury: Imaging Findings and Literature Review.

The immunotherapy revolution in cancer treatment involves a variety of specialists, not only oncologists, but also internal medicine physicians, endocrinologists, dermatologists, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists, and radiologists, introducing new scenarios and novel challenges in the diagnosis and management of a number of novel immune-related adverse events. Among these, immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pancreatic injury has been described (occurring in up to 4% of patients) and has been reported to be responsible for visits to the emergency departments in up to 1.9% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This side effect can be symptomatic or non-symptomatic, and can be associated with the development of long-term damage to the pancreas, requiring the involvement of different specialists, including radiologists and gastroenterologists in the multidisciplinary team that manages these patients. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a summary of the available literature related to immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pancreatic injury including the epidemiology, the clinical findings, and the management algorithm for diagnosis with a detailed analysis of the differential diagnosis at imaging, and treatment. A more in-depth focus is dedicated to symptomatic acute pancreatitis with its peculiar findings at imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging).

Indolent peritoneal mesothelioma: PI3K-mTOR inhibitors as a novel therapeutic strategy.

Peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a scarce abdominal-pelvic malignancy that presents with non-specific features and exhibits a wide clinical spectrum from indolent to aggressive disease. Due to it being a rare entity, there is a lack of understanding of its molecular drivers. Most treatment data are from limited small studies or extrapolated from pleural mesothelioma. Standard treatment includes curative surgery or pemetrexed-platinum palliative chemotherapy. To date, the use of novel targeted agents has been disappointing. Described is the management of two young women with papillary peritoneal mesothelioma with widespread recurrence having received platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. Both patients obtained symptomatic and disease benefit with apitolisib, a dual phosphoinositide 3-kinase-mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K-mTOR) inhibitor for subsequent relapses, with one patient having a partial response for almost 3 years. Both are alive and well 10-13 years from diagnosis. CONCLUSION: These case presentations highlight a subgroup of rare MPeM that behave indolently that is compatible with long-term survival. This series identifies the use of targeted therapies with PI3K-mTOR-based inhibitors as a novel approach, warranting further clinical assessment. Development of prognostic biomarkers is essential to aid identify tumour aggressiveness, help stratify patients and facilitate treatment decisions.

The role of hormonal therapy in patients with relapsed high-grade ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective series of tamoxifen and letrozole.

BACKGROUND: Hormonal therapy is used as a treatment option in high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC), but the role and choice of treatment remains unclear. Agents used include tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of tamoxifen (T) and letrozole (L) in HGOC in clinical practice and investigate factors influencing clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with relapsed HGOC treated with either tamoxifen or letrozole at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 2007 and 2012 was performed. The primary endpoint of the study was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included CA125 response, clinical benefit rate (CBR) and duration of response. Platinum-sensitivity and ER-status were evaluated as predictors of treatment response. RESULTS: 97 patients were included (43 T, 54 L); median age 63 years (20-92); 91% high-grade serous; median number of lines of prior chemotherapy 3 (1-8); 60% platinum-resistant, 40% platinum-sensitive; 52% ER + ve, 1% ER-ve, 47% unknown. 14 patients (6 T, 8 L) achieved a partial response, with ORR (RECIST) of 14% (T) and 15% (L). The CBR for ≥3 months was 65% (22/43) for tamoxifen and 56% (22/54) for letrozole. There was no significant difference in ORR (p = 0.99) or CBR (p = 0.14) between tamoxifen and letrozole. 22 patients (23%) had a CA-125 response with hormonal therapy (10 T - 23% and 12 L - 22%). ORR did not differ by platinum sensitivity (p = 0.42); or ER-status (positive vs unknown, p = 0.12). Responders to letrozole had longer durations of response than responders to tamoxifen (26 vs 11.5 months, p = 0.03), but equivalent disease stability duration (9.6 vs 7.2 months respectively, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Within the constraints of a retrospective study, we identified that patients treated with letrozole had a significantly longer duration of response than those treated with tamoxifen. Treatment with either tamoxifen or letrozole is a rational treatment option for patients with ER + ve HGOC, with equivalent ORR, CBR and disease stability.

Strategies to modulate the immune system in breast cancer: checkpoint inhibitors and beyond.

Is breast cancer (BC) immunogenic? Many data suggest that it is. Many observations demonstrated the prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in triple negative (TN) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive BC. TNBCs are poorly differentiated tumors with high genetic instability and very high heterogeneity. This heterogeneity enhances the 'danger signals' and select clone variants that could be more antigenic or, in other words, that could more strongly stimulate a host immune antitumor response. The response to chemotherapy is at least partly dependent on an immunological reaction against those tumor cells that are dying during the chemotherapy. One of the mechanisms whereby chemotherapy can stimulate the immune system to recognize and destroy malignant cells is commonly known as immunogenic cell death (ICD). ICD elicits an adaptive immune response. Which are the clinical implications of all 'immunome' data produced in the last years? First, validate prognostic or predictive role of TILs. Second, validate immune genomic signatures that may be predictive and prognostic in patients with TN disease. Third, incorporate an 'immunoscore' into traditional classification of BC, thus providing an essential prognostic and potentially predictive tool in the pathology report. Fourth, implement clinical trials for BC in the metastatic setting with drugs that target immune-cell-intrinsic checkpoints. Blockade of one of these checkpoints, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) or the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor may provide proof of concepts for the activity of an immune-modulation approach in the treatment of a BC.

Effects of intravenous zoledronic acid and oral ibandronate on early changes in markers of bone turnover in patients with bone metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the early effects of zoledronic acid (ZOL) and oral ibandronate (IBA) on the bone resorption marker s-CTX (serum C-telopeptide of collagen type I) and the bone formation marker B-ALP (bone-alkaline phosphatase) in patients with bone metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with at least one site of bone metastasis secondary to NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive intravenous ZOL 4 mg every 4 weeks, or oral IBA 50 mg/day. RESULTS: At 1 month of treatment, s-CTX was reduced by 54.8% (95% CI 40.4-59.8%) in the ZOL group (26 evaluable patients) compared with 38.2% (95% CI 29.8-48.7%) in the oral IBA group (27 evaluable patients) (p = 0.03). At 3 months, s-CTX was reduced by 72.6% (95% CI 58.6-71.3%) in the ZOL group, compared with 66.4% (95% CI 54.3-79.5%) in the oral IBA group (p = 0.22). Both bisphosphonates similarly decreased the bone marker B-ALP at 1 month (ZOL 24.7%, 95% CI 3.6-39.5%, and IBA 24.2%, 95% CI 2.8-43.4%) and 3 months (ZOL 28.6%, 95% CI +2.8-43.3%, and IBA 24.2%, 95% CI 3.2-47.4%). Both bisphosphonates were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Considering the changes in bone markers, ZOL and oral IBA show comparable efficacy in patients with NSCLC and bone metastases.

Dose/dense metronomic chemotherapy with fractioned cisplatin and oral daily etoposide enhances the anti-angiogenic effects of bevacizumab and has strong antitumor activity in advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: We designed a translational clinical trial to investigate whether a dose/dense chemotherapy regimen is able to enhance in patients with non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) the anti-angiogenic effects of bevacizumab, a murine/human monoclonal antibody to the vasculo-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF). We also evaluated the antitumor activity of this combination. RESULTS: The combined treatment induced a significant decline in the blood-perfusion of primary tumor (NMR-study); in serum levels of VEGF, angiopoietin-1, thrombospondin-1; and in the number of VEGF-transporting cells. In the group of 40 patients who received bevacizumab an objective response and a disease stabilization rate of 77.5% (95% CI, 75.63-93.17) and 15%, respectively, were recorded with a time to progression of 7.6 mo. Grade I-II hematological toxicity was the most common adverse event. Four early deaths within 3 mo, three cases of pneumonia, and six cases of mood depression at higher bevacizumab dosage were observed. The most active biological and maximum tolerated dose were 5 and 7.5 mg/kg, respectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (42 males and six females) with stage III B/IV NSCLC, a mean age of 68 y, and ECOG

Cytotoxic drugs up-regulate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in colon cancer cells and enhance their susceptibility to EGFR-targeted antibody-dependent cell-mediated-cytotoxicity (ADCC).

Cetuximab is a human-murine chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody to epidermal growth factor-receptor (EGFR) which exerts synergistic antitumour interactions with several cytotoxic drugs. Therefore, it is presently recommended in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of colon, head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer. Cetuximab has been designed to inhibit EGFR signalling; however, preclinical evidence suggests that its anti-cancer effects in vivo are also related to the ability of its human IgG1 backbone to trigger immunological mechanisms. Here we have investigated whether the exposure to different cytotoxic drugs may affect the susceptibility of colon cancer cells in vitro to cetuximab immuno-targeting and related lymphokine-activated killer (LAK)-mediated antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC). Five colon cancer cell lines expressing a different k-ras mutational status were evaluated for: (i) EGFR-expression, (ii) susceptibility to LAK cells and (iii) cetuximab-mediated ADCC, before and after exposure to 5-flurouracil (5-FU), gemcitabine (Gem), irinotecan (Iri) alone or in multiple two/three drug combinations. These drugs were able to up-regulate EGFR expression on the surface of all the colon cancer cell lines with a maximal effect observed few hours after the exposure to GILF regimen (Gem, Iri, Levofolinic acid and 5-FU). Chemotherapy was able to greatly enhance the sensitivity to either LAK cells or cetuximab-mediated ADCC in all the colon cancer cell lines with a mechanism independent from k-ras status. The results of our study suggest that chemotherapy may enhance cetuximab-mediated immuno-targeting and ADCC thus providing the rationale to design novel immuno-biochemotherapy regimens.

Regulatory (FoxP3+) T-cell tumor infiltration is a favorable prognostic factor in advanced colon cancer patients undergoing chemo or chemoimmunotherapy.

Antitumor immune response and chemotherapy-induced immunomodulation in colon cancer patients represented the rationale to design new strategies, like GOLFIG chemoimmunotherapy (gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and aldesleukine), that resulted a safe and very active regimen. Antitumor activity and immunity feedback to GOLFIG were strictly correlated with the best outcome observed in patients with autoimmunity signs, increase of central memory T cells, and decrease of regulatory T cells (Treg) in the peripheral blood. We thus investigated a potential correlation between the Treg tumor infiltration at diagnosis and the clinical outcome in a current randomized phase 3 trial aimed to compare the GOLFIG regimen with the standard FOLFOX chemotherapy (GOLFIG-2). An immunohistochemistry study was carried out to quantify the infiltration of Treg/FoxP3+ T lymphocytes in tumor samples of 57 patients enrolled in the GOLFIG-2 trial. Treg tumor infiltration scores were correlated with overall survival, treatment-relative survival, and progression-free survival (PFS). Higher Treg tumor infiltration scores were associated with a better prognosis in the whole series (Treg high score vs. low score: overall survival=mean 43.2 mo vs. 28.6 mo, P=0.0005) and a better outcome after treatment (Treg high score vs. low score: PFS=mean 15.8 mo vs. 8.8 mo, P=0.0009; treatment-relative survival=mean 23.1 mo vs. 18.2 mo, P=0.004). PFS was significantly longer in GOLFIG high versus all other subgroups (mean 18.1 mo vs. 9.9 mo, P=0.01). Our results suggest that a higher FoxP3+ T-lymphocyte tumor infiltration score is a favorable prognostic factor in colon cancer patients undergoing chemo or chemoimmunotherapy.

Second-line treatment of non small cell lung cancer by biweekly gemcitabine and docetaxel +/- granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and low dose aldesleukine.

Background. The antitumor activity of a novel biweekly gemcitabine (G) + docetaxel (D) regimen +/- granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and aldesleukine (IL-2) has been evaluated in a phase II trial in advanced pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results. The treatment was well tolerated. The 42.3% response rate exceeded the predefined target activity, while time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 7 and 11.2 months, respectively. A greater objective response rate (58.3% vs 28.6%) and an increased number of eosinophils, basophils and activated mononuclear blood cells were observed in those patients who also received cytokine administration. Methods. Twenty-six NSCLC patients received second line G (1000 mg/m2) and D (75 mg/m2) every 15 days. 12/26 patients also received s.c. GM-CSF (100µg, days 2-6) and s.c. IL-2 (0.5MIU/ twice daily, days 7-14 and 16-29) by random selection. Conclusion. The biweekly GD regimen is a safe and active second-line treatment in NSCLC. Addition of immune-adjuvant cytokines' may enhance the activity of this therapeutic combination.