A Rare Case of Cervical Spinal Arteriovenous Malformation: A Case Report.

Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is an abnormal connection of vasculature resulting in capillary bed bypassing and leading to neurological deterioration and high risk of bleeding. Intramedullary AVMs in the cervical spinal cord are rare and require precise diagnostics and treatment. We present a clinical case of recurrent AVMs in a 28-year-old Caucasian female with sudden and severe neck pain and variable neurological symptoms along with current diagnostic and treatment modalities. Conservative treatment was partially effective. MRI and DSA confirmed AVMs at C4 level with subsequent several endovascular treatment sessions at the age of 15 and 24 with mild neurological improvement. Afterwards the patient underwent rehabilitation with minor neurological improvement. This case highlights the clinical progression and treatment of AVMs along with showcasing current pathophysiology, classification, and imaging.

Successful Mechanical Thrombectomy for Basilar Artery Occlusion in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report.

Studies have shown the benefits of endovascular treatment (EVT) in adult stroke cases, but its application in pediatric stroke remains controversial. Despite evidence of improved outcomes in adults, there are no established recommendations for EVT in children. Conducting individual case reports and case series is vital to understanding its potential advantages and disadvantages in this context. In this case report, a 9-year-old male initially diagnosed with gastroenteritis developed sudden left-sided weakness 1 day after admission. Comprehensive imaging revealed acute ischemia in the cerebellum, indicating a basilar artery thrombus. Urgent endovascular treatment (EVT) was performed 8.5 h after the onset of neurological symptoms, achieving successful revascularization. The patient underwent rehabilitation and was later discharged with improved neurological status. Despite extensive investigations, the stroke's origin remained unknown. After six months, the patient exhibited complete neurological recovery, highlighting the patient's remarkable resilience.

Impact of Anticoagulants in Reducing Mortality and Disability in Cardioembolic Stroke Patients.

Background and Objectives: Stroke is currently the second most common cause of death and disability-adjusted life years worldwide. Previous studies have determined that cardioembolic stroke is associated with higher mortality. Our aim is to compare the long-term outcome and mortality of atherothrombotic, cardioembolic stroke patients and patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and to demonstrate that adequate treatment with DOACs is associated with better results. Materials and Methods: In our retrospective study, we collected the data of ischemic stroke patients who were treated at P. Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia, Stroke Unit, in the year 2017. In the present study, we analyzed this information to assess the patients' demographic and clinical data, vascular risk factors, functional and neurological evaluation results, and the use of anticoagulant therapy. Stroke survivors were followed-up via telephone at 30/90/180/365 days and 4 years after being discharged from the hospital. The Latvian version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS-LV) was used to evaluate patients' neurological outcomes at discharge, and patients' functional outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin scale (mRS). The collected data of the patients were separated into three groups according to the stroke subtype and use of direct oral anticoagulants. Results: A total of 654 ischemic stroke patients were admitted to the hospital in the year 2017. Of all the strokes included in the study, 262 presented an atherothrombotic etiology and 392 presented a cardioembolic etiology. The median age of the patients in the study was 76 years (IQR: 67-83). The median age of patients in the atherothrombotic stroke group was 71 years (IQR = 64-79), in the cardioembolic stroke group it was 79 (IQR = 72-84), and in the DOAC group it was 75 years (IQR = 69-82), respectively. At the period of four years, of all the atherothrombotic stroke survivors 14 (10.5%) had a severe disability, and 64 (48.1%) did not survive. However, 12 (4.1%) of the cardioembolic stroke survivors were severely disabled and 37 (12.5%) had died. In the group of patients taking DOACs 6 (4.5%) had a severe disability and 17 (12.9%) did not survive. In all the patient groups, the leading cause of death was due to severe disability (22%), followed by recurrent cardioembolic events (8%). Conclusions: Previous studies until now have concluded that cardioembolic stroke is associated with higher mortality and an unfavorable functional outcome. In our study, the cardioembolic stroke group and the DOAC group had a statistically significant higher percentage of patients with congestive heart failure and older age, but their long-term mortality was lower and they achieved independence more often than the atherothrombotic stroke patients. The proper use of anticoagulants shows great improvement in long-term survival rate and functional outcome.

Tenecteplase or Alteplase Better in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion: A Single Center Observational Study.

Background and Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis with Tenecteplase before thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients compared with previous results using Alteplase. Previous trials for Tenecteplase have indicated an increased incidence of vascular reperfusion. In April 2021, we started to primarily give Tenecteplase to patients eligible to undergo thrombectomy. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational single-center non-randomized study, we analyzed directly admitted patients with AIS who had occlusion of the internal carotid, middle cerebral, or basilar artery and who underwent thrombectomy, as well as the recanalization rate for these patients at the first angiographic assessment (mTICI score 2b-3), and complications. Results: We included 184 patients (demographic characteristics did not differ between Tenecteplase and Alteplase groups (mean age 68.4 vs. 73.0 years; female sex 53.3% vs. 51.1%, NIHSS 14 (IQR 4-26) vs. 15 (2-31). Forty-five patients received Tenecteplase and 139 Alteplase before endovascular treatment (EVT). Pre-EVT (endovascular treatment) recanalization was more likely to occur with Tenecteplase rather than Alteplase (22.2% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.02). Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) after EVT was achieved in 155 patients (42 (93.4%) vs. 113 (81.3), p = 0.07). Hemorrhagic imbibition occurred in 15 (33.3%) Tenecteplase-treated patients compared with 39 (28.1%) Alteplase-treated patients (p = 0.5). Patients treated with Tenecteplase had higher odds of excellent functional outcome than Alteplase-treated patients (Tenecteplase 48.6% vs. Alteplase 26.1%; OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.17-0.81), p = 0.01). Conclusions: Tenecteplase (25 mg/kg) could have superior clinical efficacy over Alteplase for AIS patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO), administered before EVT. The improvement in reperfusion rate and the better excellent functional outcome could come without an increased safety concern.

Is Anticoagulation Necessary for Severely Disabled Cardioembolic Stroke Survivors?

Background and Objectives: Oral anticoagulants are the hallmark of cardioembolic stroke prevention, but they are frequently underused, especially in elderly patients and patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. In our paper, we analyzed the long-term outcome of severely disabled cardioembolic stroke survivors depending on the prescribed antithrombotic secondary prevention medication. Materials and Methods: In our study, we retrospectively collected data for ischemic stroke (IS) patients treated in P. Stradins Clinical University hospital, Riga, Latvia, from 2014 until 2017. Patients' clinical data were collected using local stroke registry, including patients' demographic data, vascular risk factors, clinical findings, and laboratory results. Severely disabled stroke survivors were followed up by phone at 30/90/180/365 days after discharge. Patients' functional outcomes were assessed using the adapted version of The Rankin Focused Assessment-Ambulation. The collected data were compared in 4 groups according to prescribed secondary prevention medication. Results: A total of 682 (91.42%) patients were followed up and included in data analysis. The median age of patients was 80 (IQR = 75-85) years. Of these patients, 231 (31%) were males and 515 (69%) were females. One-year probability of survival of patients not taking any preventive medication was 53% (IQR = 29-76), while in patients taking antiplatelet agents it was 57% (IQR = 37-78), 78% (IQR = 68-88) of patients on Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and 81% (IQR = 72-90) in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). One year after discharge 73 (31%) had mRS 0-2, 50 (20.9%), 29 (12.1%) were still severely disabled, and 87 (36.4%) had died. Conclusions: Anticoagulant use in secondary prevention predicts better functional outcome and higher survival rate in patients with severe cardioembolic stroke due to non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), therefore severe neurological deficit must not be a reason of restriction of anticoagulation.

Changes in Cognition, Depression and Quality of Life after Carotid Stenosis Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have evaluated the change of cognitive performance after severe carotid artery stenosis, the results still remain elusive. The objective of this study was to assess changes in cognitive function, depressive symptoms and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) after carotid stenosis revascularisation and Best Medical Treatment (BMT). METHODS: Study involved 213 patients with ≥70% carotid stenosis who underwent assessment of cognitive function using Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA), depressive symptoms - using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and HRQoL - using Medical Outcome Survey Short Form version 2 (SF-36v2). The assessment was performed before and at 6 and 12 months followup periods in patients who had Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA), Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) or received BMT only. RESULTS: Improvement in the total MoCA scores was observed after 6 and 12 months (p<0.001, Kendall's W=0.28) in the CEA group. In the CAS group - after 12 months (p=0.01, Kendall's W=0.261) whereas in the BMT group - no significant changes (p=0.295, Kendall's W=0.081) were observed. Reduction of depressive symptoms was not found in any of the study groups. Comparing mean SF-36v2 scores in the CEA group, there was no significant difference in any of 10 subscales. Likewise in the CAS group - no significant difference in 9 of 10 subscales (p=0.028, η2=0.343) was observed. Three subscales worsened in the BMT group during the 1-year follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe carotid stenosis who underwent revascularisation enhanced their cognitive performance without exerting significant change of depressive symptoms. Preoperative HRQoL may be maintained for at least one year in the CEA group.

Endovascular thrombectomy in anterior circulation stroke and clinical value of bridging with intravenous thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: Bridging treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke is applied under the assumption of benefits for patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the benefit of this additional step has not yet been proven. PURPOSE: To compare procedural parameters (procedural time, number of attempts), complications, and clinical outcome in patients receiving EVT vs. patients with bridging treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study all patients had acute anterior cerebral circulation occlusion and were treated with EVT. All patients were selected for treatment based on clinical criteria, multimodal computed tomography (CT) imaging. Eighty-four patients were treated with bridging IVT followed by EVT; 62 patients were treated with EVT only. RESULTS: Bridging therapy did not influence endovascular procedure time ( P = 0.71) or number of attempts needed ( P = 0.63). Bleeding from any site was more common in the bridging group (27, 32%) vs. the EVT group (12, 19%) ( P = 0.09). Functional independence modified Rankin Scale after 90 days was slightly higher in the bridging group (44%) vs. the EVT group (42%) ( P = 0.14). Mortality did not differ significantly at 90 days: 17% in the bridging group vs. 21% in EVT alone ( P = 0.57). Both treatment methods showed high recanalization rates: 94% in the bridging group and 89% for EVT alone. CONCLUSION: Bridging treatment in LVO did not show benefits or elevated risks of complications in comparison to EVT only. The bridging group did not show significantly better neurological outcome or significant impact on procedural parameters vs. EVT alone.

Influence of Severe Carotid Stenosis on Cognition, Depressive Symptoms and Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery disease is not just a causal risk factor of ischemic stroke, but may predispose patients to depressive symptoms and low health related quality of life (HRQoL). OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the present study were to assess the association between severe carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and cognitive impairment, frequency of depressive symptoms and status of HRQoL. METHODS: Cross - sectional study involved 55 patients with severe CAS and 54 patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). Cognitive impairment was assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), depressive symptoms - PHQ-9 scale. HRQoL was measured using Medical Outcome Survey Short Form version 2 (SF-36v2). RESULTS: Median MoCA score 24 [23;26] was significantly lower in patients with severe CAS than in patients with PAD - 26 [25-28],(p=0.005; effect size r=0.3). There was no statistically significant difference of median PHQ-9 scores the in CAS group (median PHQ-9 score 4.0 [5]) and in the PAD group (median PHQ-9 score 5.5 [7]), (p=0.08, effect size r=0.18). Mean SF-36v2 scores were similar in CAS and PAD groups except for bodily pain (p=0.001, Cohen's d value = 0.77) and vitality (p=0.02, Cohen's d value = 0.49). CONCLUSION: In summary, our findings indicate that severe CAS could play a role in cognitive decline. Further studies should be conducted using larger patient cohorts without ischemic brain lesions and with balanced vascular risk profiles to investigate impact of CAS on cognition. There was no association between severe CAS and depressive symptoms in the present study. As patients with severe CAS did not exhibit physical symptoms, HRQoL was better for those patients than for patients with lower extremity PAD.

The adaption and evaluation of a Latvian version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Objectives To determine the validity and reliability of a Latvian version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (LV-NIHSS) for evaluating Latvian stroke patients. Methods The adaption of the LV-NIHSS followed standard methods used for the adaption and validation of clinical assessment tools. The scale validity was tested by comparison with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the modified Rankin scale (mRs). The reliability of the LV-NIHSS was evaluated by intra-rater and inter-rater agreement using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Results A total of 296 stroke patients and 101 control subjects were evaluated. The mean age of the overall study population was 73.6 years (range, 37 - 94 years; 227 [57.2%] were female). The mean LV-NIHSS score of the patients with stroke was 8.4 ± 6.2. In terms of construct validity of the LV-NIHSS, it correlated with the GCS ( r = -0.571) and mRs ( r = 0.755). In terms of the reliability of the LV-NIHSS, the inter-rater agreement had an ICC of 0.99 and the intra-rater agreement had an ICC of 0.99. Conclusion The adaption of LV-NIHSS was successful and the evaluation showed that the scale was valid and reliable for evaluating Latvian stroke patients.