Assessment of cardiovascular risk and physical activity: the role of cardiac-specific biomarkers in the general population and athletes.

The first part of this Inter-Society Document describes the mechanisms involved in the development of cardiovascular diseases, particularly arterial hypertension, in adults and the elderly. It will also examine how consistent physical exercise during adolescence and adulthood can help maintain blood pressure levels and prevent progression to symptomatic heart failure. The discussion will include experimental and clinical evidence on the use of specific exercise programs for preventing and controlling cardiovascular diseases in adults and the elderly. In the second part, the clinical relevance of cardiac-specific biomarkers in assessing cardiovascular risk in the general adult population will be examined, with a focus on individuals engaged in sports activities. This section will review recent studies that suggest a significant role of biomarkers in assessing cardiovascular risk, particularly the presence of cardiac damage, in athletes who participate in high-intensity sports. Finally, the document will discuss the potential of using cardiac-specific biomarkers to monitor the effectiveness of personalized physical activity programs (Adapted Physical Activity, APA). These programs are prescribed for specific situations, such as chronic diseases or physical disabilities, including cardiovascular diseases. The purposes of this Inter-Society Document are the following: 1) to discuss the close pathophysiological relationship between physical activity levels (ranging from sedentary behavior to competitive sports), age categories (from adolescence to elderly age), and the development of cardiovascular diseases; 2) to review in detail the experimental and clinical evidences supporting the role of cardiac biomarkers in identifying athletes and individuals of general population at higher cardiovascular risk; 3) to stimulate scientific societies and organizations to develop specific multicenter studies that may take into account the role of cardiac biomarkers in subjects who follow specific exercise programs in order to monitor their cardiovascular risk.

Evaluation of the cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: role of cardiac-specific biomarkers.

Major adverse cardiovascular events are frequently observed in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery during the peri-operative period. At this time, the possibility to predict cardiovascular events remains limited, despite the introduction of several algorithms to calculate the risk of adverse events, mainly death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) based on the clinical history, risk factors (sex, age, lipid profile, serum creatinine) and non-invasive cardiac exams (electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, stress tests). The cardiac-specific biomarkers natriuretic peptides (NPs) and cardiac troponins (cTn) have been proposed as additional tools for risk prediction in the peri-operative period, particularly for the identification of myocardial injury in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. The prognostic information from the measurement of BNP/NT-proBNP and hs-cTn is independent and complementary to other important indicators of risk, also including ECG and imaging techniques. Elevated levels of cardiac-specific biomarkers before surgery are associated with a markedly higher risk of MACE during the peri-operative period. BNP/NT-proBNP and hs-cTn should be measured in all patients during the clinical evaluation before surgery, particularly during intermediate- or high-risk surgery, in patients aged >65 years and/or with comorbidities. Several questions remain to be assessed in dedicated clinical studies, such as how to optimize the management of patients with raised cardiac specific biomarkers before surgery, and whether a strategy based on biomarker measurement improves patient outcomes and is cost-effective.

Use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in the emergency department for the early rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) in Italy.

Serial measurements of cardiac troponin are recommended by international guidelines to diagnose myocardial infarction (MI) since 2000. However, some relevant differences exist between the three different international guidelines published between 2020 and 2021 for the management of patients with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation. In particular, there is no agreement on the cut-offs or absolute change values to diagnose non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI). Other controversial issues concern the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of cut-off values for the most rapid algorithms (0 h/1 h or 0 h/2 h) to rule-in and rule-out NSTEMI. Finally, another important point is the possible differences between demographic and clinical characteristics of patients enrolled in multicenter trials compared to those routinely admitted to the Emergency Department in Italy. The Study Group of Cardiac Biomarkers, supported by the Italian Scientific Societies Società Italiana di Biochimica Clinica, Italian Society of the European Ligand Assay Society, and Società Italiana di Patolgia Clinica e Medicina di Laboratorio decided to revise the document previously published in 2013 about the management of patients with suspected NSTEMI, and to provide some suggestions for the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice, with a particular focus on the Italian setting.

High-sensitivity methods for cardiac troponins: The mission is not over yet.

The measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) is recommended by all guidelines as the gold standard for the differential diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes. The aim of this review is to discuss in details some key issues regarding both analytical and clinical characteristics of the high-sensitivity methods for cTn (hs-cTn), which are still considered controversial or unresolved. In particular, the major clinical concern regarding hs-cTn methods is the difficulty to differentiate the pathophysiological mechanism responsible for biomarker release from cardiomyocytes after reversible or irreversible injury, respectively. Indeed, recent experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that different circulating forms of cTnI and cTnT can be respectively measured in plasma samples of patients with reversible or irreversible myocardial injury. Accordingly, a new generation of hs-Tn methods should be set up, based on immunometric immunoassays or chromatographic techniques, specific for circulating peptide forms more characteristics for reversible or irreversible myocardial injury. It is conceivable that this new generation of hs-cTn methods will complete the mission regarding the laboratory tests for specific cardiac biomarkers, started more than 20 years ago, which has already revolutionized the diagnosis, prognosis and management of patients with cardiac diseases.

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T methods for the early detection of myocardial injury in patients on chemotherapy.

Important advances achieved in pharmacological cancer treatment have led progressively to a reduction in mortality from many forms of cancer, and increasing numbers of previously incurable patients can now hope to become cancer-free. Yet, to achieve these improved outcomes a high price has been paid in terms of untoward side effects associated with treatment, cardio-toxicity in particular. Several recent studies have reported that cardiac troponin assay using high-sensitivity methods (hs-cTn) can enable the early detection of myocardial injury related to chemotherapy or abuse of drugs that are potentially cardiotoxic. Several authors have recently suggested that changes in hs-cTn values enable the early diagnosis of cardiac injury from chemotherapy, thus potentially benefitting cancer patients with increased troponin values by initiating early cardioprotective therapy. However, large randomised clinical trials are needed in order to evaluate the cost/benefit ratio of standardised protocols for the early detection of cardiotoxicity using the hs-cTn assay in patients treated with chemotherapy.

Evidence on clinical relevance of cardiovascular risk evaluation in the general population using cardio-specific biomarkers.

In recent years, the formulation of some immunoassays with high-sensitivity analytical performance allowed the accurate measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and T (cTnT) levels in reference subjects. Several studies have demonstrated the association between the risk of major cardiovascular events and cardiac troponin concentrations even for biomarker values within the reference intervals. High-sensitivity cTnI and cTnT methods (hs-cTn) enable to monitor myocardial renewal and remodelling, and to promptly identify patients at highest risk ofheart failure. An early and effective treatment of individuals at higher cardiovascular risk may revert the initial myocardial remodelling and slow down heart failure progression. Specific clinical trials should be carried out to demonstrate the efficacy and efficiency of the general population screening by means of cost-benefit analysis, in order to better identify individuals at higher risk for heart failure (HF) progression with hs-cTn methods.

Harmonization of two hs-cTnI methods based on recalibration of measured quality control and clinical samples.

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to evaluate whether is possible to harmonize the results of two hs-cTnI methods using a recalibration procedure based on linear regression models and measured values of external quality assessment (EQA) and clinical samples. METHODS: A two-step experimental approach was used. The preliminary step was performed using 16 EQA samples. The harmonization procedure was then validated by using 2530 heparinized plasma samples collected by 12 Italian University and Regional Hospitals from apparently healthy volunteers and patients admitted to emergency department with cardiac diseases. Two hs-cTnI methods were tested: Architect Stat High Sensitive Troponin-I, and the Access hs-cTnI using DxI platform. Linear regression models based on mean values measured with the two hs-cTni methods were used. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the measurement bias between the two methods was found after recalibration procedure. The agreement between-methods improved of about 2.5 folds after recalibration, as assessed by reduction in mean CV values from 38.4% (SD 25.9%) before recalibration to 15.0% (SD 10.6%) after recalibration for hs-cTnI values ≤ 500 ng/L (n = 13, P = 0.0111 by non-parametric test for paired data). CONCLUSIONS: A recalibration procedure based on means of measured concentrations with hs-cTnI methods, which use monoclonal antibodies with similar binding characteristics, can be used to significantly reduce systematic bias and so to improve harmonization between methods. The results of this study can aid laboratorians and clinicians to better compare the concentrations respectively measured with the Architect and Access hs-cTnI methods.

Percentile transformation and recalibration functions allow harmonization of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) immunoassay results.

Background The comparability of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) results cannot be easily obtained using SI-traceable reference measurement procedures (RPMs) or reference materials, whilst harmonization is more feasible. The aim of this study was to identify and validate a new approach for the harmonization of TSH results. Methods Percentile normalization was applied to 125,419 TSH results, obtained from seven laboratories using three immunoassays (Access 3rd IS Thyrotropin, Beckman Coulter Diagnostics; Architect System, Abbott Diagnostics and Elecsys, Roche Diagnostics). Recalibration equations (RCAL) were derived by robust regressions using bootstrapped distribution. Two datasets, the first of 119 EQAs, the second of 610, 638 and 639 results from Access, Architect and Elecsys TSH results, respectively, were used to validate RCAL. A dataset of 142,821 TSH values was used to derive reference intervals (RIs) after applying RCAL. Results Access, Abbott and Elecsys TSH distributions were significantly different (p < 0.001). RCAL intercepts and slopes were -0.003 and 0.984 for Access, 0.032 and 1.041 for Architect, -0.031 and 1.003 for Elecsys, respectively. Validation using EQAs showed that before and after RCAL, the coefficients of variation (CVs) or among-assay results decreased from 10.72% to 8.16%. The second validation dataset was used to test RCALs. The median of between-assay differences ranged from -0.0053 to 0.1955 mIU/L of TSH. Elecsys recalibrated to Access (and vice-versa) showed non-significant difference. TSH RI after RCAL resulted in 0.37-5.11 mIU/L overall, 0.49-4.96 mIU/L for females and 0.40-4.92 mIU/L for males. A significant difference across age classes was identified. Conclusions Percentile normalization and robust regression are valuable tools for deriving RCALs and harmonizing TSH values.

Evaluation of analytical performance of immunoassay methods for cTnI and cTnT: From theory to practice.

Current guidelines worldwide recommend cardiac troponins I (cTnI) and T (cTnT) as the biomarkers of choice for the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and the measurement of the 99th upper reference population limit (URL) value for cardiac troponins, with an imprecision of ≤10 CV%. Measuring the 99th URL of cTnI and cTnT is a challenging analytical task due to low biomarker concentrations present in healthy subjects. Therefore, since the year 2006, several manufacturers have established new generation cTnI and cTnT immunoassays with an improved analytical sensitivity in accordance with the quality specifications described in international guidelines, the more recent of which state that only immunoassays that meet the required quality specifications should be considered "high-sensitivity" methods. For the early diagnosis of ACS, and for the stratification of cardiovascular risk in cardiac patients and the general population, high-sensitivity methods should be employed. It is therefore important for laboratory professionals and clinicians to gain a thorough understanding of the analytical performances of immunoassay methods for cTnI and cTnT, especially at low to normal concentration ranges. The aim of the present study was to analyze critical aspects related to definition, analytical performance, pathophysiological interpretations, and the clinical relevance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays.

Head-to-head comparison of plasma cTnI concentration values measured with three high-sensitivity methods in a large Italian population of healthy volunteers and patients admitted to emergency department with acute coronary syndrome: A multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: The study aim is to compare cTnI values measured with three high-sensitivity (hs) methods in apparently healthy volunteers and patients admitted to emergency department (ED) with acute coronary syndrome enrolled in a large multicentre study. METHODS: Heparinized plasma samples were collected from 1511 apparently healthy subjects from 8 Italian clinical institutions (mean age: 51.5 years, SD: 14.1 years, range: 18-65 years, F/M ratio:0.95). All volunteers denied chronic or acute diseases and had normal values of routine laboratory tests. Moreover, 1322 heparinized plasma sample were also collected by 9 Italian clinical institutions from patients admitted to ED with clinical symptoms typical of acute coronary syndrome. The reference study laboratory assayed all plasma samples with three hs-methods: Architect hs-cTnI, Access hs-cTnI and ADVIA Centaur XPT methods. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was also used to analyze the between-method differences among hs-cTnI assays. RESULTS: On average, a between-method difference of 31.2% CV was found among the results of hs-cTnI immunoassays. ADVIA Centaur XPT method measured higher cTnI values than Architect and Access methods. Moreover, 99th percentile URL values depended not only on age and sex of reference population, but also on the statistical approach used for calculation (robust non-parametric vs bootstrap). CONCLUSIONS: Due to differences in concentrations and reference values, clinicians should be advised that plasma samples of the same patient should be measured for cTnI assay in the same laboratory. Specific clinical studies are needed to establish the most appropriate statistical approach to calculate the 99th percentile URL values for hs-cTnI methods.

Evaluation of 99th percentile and reference change values of the hs-cTnI method using ADVIA Centaur XPT platform: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: According to quality specifications required by international guidelines, the evaluation of the 99th URL value is a very difficult task that is usually beyond the capacity of a single laboratory. The aims of this article are to report and discuss the results of a multicenter study concerning the evaluation of the 99th percentile URL and reference change (RCV) of the ADVIA Centaur High-Sensitivity Troponin I (TNIH), recently distributed to the Italian clinical laboratories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The reference population evaluated with ADVIA XPT method for the calculation of cTnI reference distribution parameters consisted of 1325 healthy adults subjects (age range from 18 to 86 years), including 653 women (mean age 50.7 years, SD 14.5 years) and 672 men (mean age 50.9 years, SD 13.8 years), well matched for both age (P = .8112) and sex (F/M = 0.97). RESULTS: cTnI distribution values of reference population was highly skewed, while log-transformed cTnI values roughly approximated a log-normal distribution. Men have higher cTnI values than women throughout all the adult lifespan. Moreover, the subjects with age ≤ 55 years had significantly lower cTnI values than those with age > 55 years (p < .0001). Of note, 62% of women and 77% of men had equal or higher than cTnI values than the LoD value of the method (i.e., 2.2 ng/L). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study demonstrate that the ADVIA Centaur High-Sensitivity Troponin I using the XPT automated platform fits both the criteria and quality specifications required by the most recent international guidelines for high-sensitivity methods for cTnI assay.

Evaluation of 99th percentile and reference change values of a high-sensitivity cTnI method: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry (SIBioC) and the Italian Section of the European Ligand Assay Society (ELAS) have recently promoted a multicenter study (Italian hs-cTnI Study) with the aim to accurately evaluate analytical performances and reference values of the most popular cTnI methods commercially available in Italy. The aim of this article is to report the results of the Italian hs-cTnI Study concerning the evaluation of the 99th percentile URL and reference change (RCV) values around the 99th URL of the Access cTnI method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Heparinized plasma samples were collected from 1306 healthy adult volunteers by 8 Italian clinical centers. Every center collected from 50 to 150 plasma samples from healthy adult subjects. All volunteers denied the presence of chronic or acute diseases and had normal values of routine laboratory tests (including creatinine, electrolytes, glucose and blood counts). An older cohort of 457 adult subjects (mean age 63.0 years; SD 8.1 years, minimum 47 years, maximum 86 years) underwent also ECG and cardiac imaging analysis in order to exclude the presence of asymptomatic cardiac disease. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study confirm that the Access hsTnI method using the DxI platform satisfies the two criteria required by international guidelines for high-sensitivity methods for cTn assay. Furthermore, the results of this study confirm that the calculation of the 99th percentile URL values are greatly affected not only by age and sex of the reference population, but also by the statistical approach used for calculation of cTnI distribution parameters.

A multicenter study for the evaluation of the reference interval for TSH in Italy (ELAS TSH Italian Study).

Background The aims of this study were: (1) to calculate reliable thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) reference intervals using laboratory databases; (2) to evaluate the relationship between TSH, sex and age values in different large Italian populations. Methods The TSH values stored in the laboratory information system of clinical laboratories of four Italian city hospitals, including 146,801 TSH measurements (with the respective age and sex data of individuals) were taken in consideration. Assuming a log-normal distribution, to log-transformed TSH values were applied the Dixon's iterative principle in order to exclude the outliers. At the end of this iterative process 142,821 log-transformed TSH results remained. The four clinical laboratories measured serum TSH concentrations using the same TSH immunoassay method (Access TSH 3rd IS, using UniCel DxI platform). Results The TSH reference interval calculated in the present study (0.362-5.280 mIU/L) is similar to that suggested by the manufacturer for the Access TSH 3rd IS assay (0.45-5.33 mIU/L). TSH values in females were significantly higher than in males (females: mean=2.06 mIU/L; standard deviation [SD]=1.26 mIU/L; n=101,243; males: mean=1.92 mIU/L; SD=1.19 mIU/L; n=41,578; p<0.0001). Moreover, a negative linear relationship was observed between TSH throughout all interval age values (from 0 to 105 years). Conclusions The results of the present multicenter study confirm that data mining techniques can be used to calculate clinically useful reference intervals for TSH. From a pathophysiological point of view, our results suggest that some Northern populations of Italy might still suffer some harmful effects on the thyroid gland due to mild to moderate iodine intake deficiency. Specific clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

A Black Swan in clinical laboratory practice: the analytical error due to interferences in immunoassay methods.

It is well known that the results of immunoassay methods can be affected by specific or non-specific interferences, ranging from 0.4% to 4.0%. The presence of interference may greatly compromise the accuracy of immunoassay analyses causing an error in the measurement, producing false-positive or false-negative results. From a clinical point of view, these analytical errors may have serious implications for patient care because they can cause misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment. Unfortunately, it is a very difficult task to identify the irregular analytical errors related to immunoassay methods because they are not detectable by normal laboratory quality control procedures, are reproducible within the test system, may be clinically plausible and are relatively rare. The first line of defense against erroneous results is to use in laboratory practice only immunoassay systems with the highest level of robustness against interference. The second line of defense is always taking into account the possibility of interference in immunoassay results. A correct approach should be addressed on identification of samples at high risk of interference. The attainment of this goal requires a critical review of the test result in relation to patient's clinical conditions and literature data, taking into account the analytical characteristics of the immunoassay system. The experts in immunoassay systems should make every effort to find some specific and reliable quality indicators for irregular analytical errors in order to better detect and monitor erroneous immunoassay results due to specific or non-specific interferences.

ANMCO/ELAS/SIBioC Consensus Document: biomarkers in heart failure.

Biomarkers have dramatically impacted the way heart failure (HF) patients are evaluated and managed. A biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological or pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. Natriuretic peptides [B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP] are the gold standard biomarkers in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of HF, and a natriuretic peptide-guided HF management looks promising. In the last few years, an array of additional biomarkers has emerged, each reflecting different pathophysiological processes in the development and progression of HF: myocardial insult, inflammation, fibrosis, and remodelling, but their role in the clinical care of the patient is still partially defined and more studies are needed before to be well validated. Moreover, several new biomarkers have the potential to identify patients with early renal dysfunction and appear to have promise to help the management cardio-renal syndrome. With different biomarkers reflecting HF presence, the various pathways involved in its progression, as well as identifying unique treatment options for HF management, a closer cardiologist-laboratory link, with a multi-biomarker approach to the HF patient, is not far ahead, allowing the unique opportunity for specifically tailoring care to the individual pathological phenotype.

Harmonization protocols for TSH immunoassays: a multicenter study in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Systematic difference between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) immunoassays may produce misleading interpretation when samples of the same patients are measured with different methods. The study aims were to evaluate whether systematic differences are present among TSH immunoassays, and whether it is possible to obtain a better harmonization among TSH methods using results obtained in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes. METHODS: Seven Italian clinical laboratories measured TSH in 745 serum samples of healthy subjects and patients with thyroid disorders. These samples were also re-measured by two reference laboratories of the study with the six TSH immunoassays most popular in Italy after 2 months of storage at -80 °C. Moreover, these data were compared to 53,823 TSH measurements, obtained by laboratories participant to 2012-2015 EQA annual cycles in 72 quality control samples (TSH concentrations from about 0.1 mIU/L to 18.0 mIU/L). TSH concentrations were recalibrated using a mathematical approach based on the principal component analysis (PCA). RESULTS: Systematic differences were found between the most popular commercially available TSH immunoassays. TSH concentrations measured by the clinical laboratories were very closely correlated to those measured with the same method by reference laboratories after 2 months of storage at -80 °C. After recalibration using the PCA approach the variation of TSH values significantly decreased from a median pre-calibration value of 13.53% (10.79%-16.53%) to 9.63% (6.90%-13.21%) after recalibration. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that EQA schemes are useful to improve harmonization among TSH immunoassays and also to produce some mathematical formulas, which can be used by clinicians to better compare TSH values measured with different methods.

Multicenter evaluation of the new immunoassay method for TSH measurement using the automated DxI platform.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Recently, Beckman Coulter Diagnostics set up a new TSH immunoassay for the automated DxI platform. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the analytical performance and clinical results of this method with those of previous method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter study (named TSH ELAS Study) was organized using 593 serum samples, collected from healthy subjects and patients with thyroid disorders, and 13 control samples, circulated in an External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme. RESULTS: The values of LoB and LoD, and LoQ at 20% CV were 0.0004mIU/L, 0.001mIU/L and 0.0023mIU/L, respectively. Moreover, TSH concentrations >0.01mIU/L actually show imprecision values lower than 5% CV. This new TSH assay showed a systematic underestimation (on average of 6.25%) compared to old method, which is mainly due to larger differences between methods for samples with low TSH concentrations, related to the better analytical sensitivity of new compared to old method. In a reference population, including 279 apparently healthy adult subjects, Caucasian volunteers (mean age 43.6years, age 20-63years, 138 women and 141 males) the distribution of TSH concentrations was: mean (CI 95%) 1.694mIU/L (1.588-1.779), median 1.495mIU/L (1.412-1.588mIU/L), 97.5th percentile 3.707mIU/L. CONCLUSIONS: The new TSH immunoassay for DxI platform shows some relevant improvements compared to the previous one: use of the most recent WHO 3rd IRP 81/563 standard and monoclonal antibodies (instead of polyclonal antibodies of the old method), and better analytical sensitivities and reproducibility.

Diagnostic accuracy of two tests for determination of anti-m2 in the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis: Is it possible to predict the course of the disease?

To evaluate the analytical agreement between results obtained from the indirect immunofluorescence methods and from the multiplexed line-blot assay and EliA-M2, to analyze the diagnostic accuracy in a cohort of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients and in control patients of two different types of tests for anti-M2 and assess whether, with the advent of a quantitative test, the possibility exists to correlate disease activity with the value of AMA. Serum analysis of 67 patients with fluorescence patterns detected on Hep-2 cells suggestive of PBC-related antibodies and three groups of patients (15 PBC, 16 PBC suspect and 48 disease controls) was carried out. All samples were tested by both a qualitative test multiplexed line-blot Autoimmune Liver Disease Profile Euroline and by a quantitative test EliA-M2 IgG. In order to evaluate a possible correlation between the quantitative M2 and disease activity, we divided patients mixed in a further three groups based on the value EliA-M2. For each of these groups were calculated the average values of the main indices of cholestasis. A perfect agreement was shown between the EliA-M2 and the multiplexed line-blot method for AMA detection. All sera of patients with PBC were positive with both tests, with a 100 % sensitivity. Forty-seven of the 48 sera of the control group were negative for both tests with a 100 % next specificity, and only 70 % for the AMA-IIF. We had also observed in the other three groups of patients that the average of the values of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase increases with the increase of the value EliA-M2. The difference between the mean values of the most significant parameter which the alkaline phosphatase of the three groups is significant, with a statistically significant difference between the first and the third group (p value 0.023). Both the qualitative method Profile Euroline and the quantitative EliA-M2 have a high diagnostic accuracy for PBC, with a specificity higher than the immunofluorescence method. These preliminary data might suggest the possibility of using the dosage EliA-M2 not only in the diagnosis phase but also in the monitoring of disease activity.

[ANMCO/ELAS/SIBioC Consensus document: Recommendations for the use of cardiac biomarkers in heart failure patients]. / Documento di consenso ANMCO/ELAS/SIBioC: Raccomandazioni sull'impiego dei biomarcatori cardiaci nello scompenso cardiaco.

Biomarkers have dramatically impacted the way heart failure (HF) patients are evaluated and managed. A biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological or pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. Natriuretic peptides (B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] and N-terminal proBNP) are the gold standard biomarkers in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of HF, and a natriuretic peptide-guided HF management looks promising. In the last few years, an array of additional biomarkers has emerged, each reflecting different pathophysiological processes in the development and progression of HF: myocardial insult, inflammation, fibrosis and remodeling, but their role in the clinical care of the patient is still partially defined and more studies are needed before to be well validated. Moreover, several new biomarkers have the potential to identify patients with early renal dysfunction and appear to have promise to help the management cardio-renal syndrome.With different biomarkers reflecting HF presence, the various pathways involved in its progression, as well as identifying unique treatment options for HF management, a closer cardiologist-laboratory link, with a multi-biomarker approach to the HF patient, is not far ahead, allowing the unique opportunity for specifically tailoring care to the individual pathological phenotype.

Clinical relevance and inter-test reliability of anti-infliximab antibodies and infliximab trough levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with infliximab is a common option for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring could improve treatment management. AIMS: To test inter-test reliability of two commercially available diagnostic kits for infliximab trough levels and infliximab antibodies, and their association with treatment outcomes. METHODS: 86 IBD outpatients on infliximab maintenance treatment were enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional study, 115 samples were available for inter-test reliability. RESULTS: Inter-test agreement was good both for trough levels (concordance correlation coefficient 0.78, weighted κ 0.60, Sperman's ρ 0.937) and for infliximab antibodies (weighted κ 0.79) measurement, when comparing Promonitor and ImmunDiagnostik kits. According to manufacturers' cut-off values, trough levels were classified as undetectable (17%), low (21%) or in range (63%). The only significant associations were: mucosal healing (p=0.026; OR 6.50), infliximab antibody status (p=0.0015; OR 0.031) and adverse events (p=0.009; OR 0.115). Higher trough levels were observed among patients on concomitant steroid/immunosuppressive therapy and among patients with dose-intensification. Infliximab antibodies were significantly associated to treatment-related adverse events (p=0.0003, OR 30.42), and to lower trough levels, but not to other clinical variables. CONCLUSION: The two tests performed equally well. Infliximab antibodies were associated to adverse events, while trough levels were not associated to treatment outcomes.