Safety and pharmacokinetics of higher doses of caspofungin in healthy adult participants.

Caspofungin was the first in a new class of antifungal agents (echinocandins) indicated for the treatment of primary and refractory fungal infections. Higher doses of caspofungin may provide another option for patients who have failed caspofungin or other antifungal therapy. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single 150- and 210-mg doses of caspofungin in 16 healthy participants and 100 mg/d for 21 days in 20 healthy participants. Other than infusion site reactions and 1 reversible elevation in alanine aminotransferase (≥2× and <4× upper limit of normal), caspofungin was generally well tolerated. Geometric mean AUC(0-∞) after single 150- and 210-mg doses was 279.7 and 374.9 µg·h/mL, respectively; peak concentrations were 29.4 and 33.5 µg/mL, respectively; and 24-hour postdose concentrations were 2.8 and 4.2 µg/mL, respectively. Steady state was achieved in the third week of dosing. Following multiple 100-mg doses of caspofungin, day 21 geometric mean AUC(0-24) was 227.4 µg·h/mL, peak concentration was 20.9 µg/mL, and trough concentration was 4.7 µg/mL. Beta-phase t(1/2) was ~8 to ~13 hours. Caspofungin pharmacokinetics at these higher doses were dose proportional to and consistent with those observed at lower doses, suggesting a modest nonlinearity of increased accumulation with dose, which was considered not clinically meaningful.

Bioequivalence of sitagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination tablets and concomitant administration of sitagliptin and metformin in healthy adult subjects: a randomized, open-label, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with an oral antihyperglycaemic agent administered as monotherapy is often unsuccessful at achieving or maintaining glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The combined use of sitagliptin and metformin is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus, consistent with the complementary mechanisms of action by which these two agents improve glucose control. OBJECTIVES: To establish bioequivalence between sitagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets (Janumet®) and co-administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as individual tablets. METHODS: This was an randomized, open-label, two-part, two-period crossover study, which included a total of 48 healthy subjects, 24 subjects per part (parts I and II). Within each part, subjects were assigned to receive treatments in random order; treatment periods were separated by a washout interval of at least 7 days. Eligible study participants included healthy, non-smoking (within previous 6 months), male and female subjects aged between 18 and 45 years with a body mass index ≤32 kg/m². Part I consisted of treatments A (co-administration of sitagliptin 50 mg and metformin 500 mg) and B (sitagliptin/metformin 50 mg/500 mg FDC tablet); part II consisted of treatments C (co-administration of sitagliptin 50 mg and metformin 1000 mg) and D (sitagliptin 50 mg/metformin 1000 mg FDC tablet). Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 72 hours post-dose in each treatment period for determination of plasma sitagliptin and metformin concentrations and calculation of the respective pharmacokinetic parameters. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for both sitagliptin and metformin were designated as the primary and secondary study endpoints, respectively, and analysed using an ANOVA model after logarithmic transformation of the data. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs; FDC tablet/co-administration) of the AUC(∞) and C(max) for both sitagliptin and metformin fell within pre-specified bounds of (0.80, 1.25). RESULTS: The GMRs (90% CI) for the AUC(∞) of sitagliptin 50 mg and metformin 500 mg were 0.98 (0.96, 1.00) and 1.0 (0.95, 1.04), respectively, and for C(max) of sitagliptin and metformin were 1.00 (0.94, 1.06) and 1.00 (0.94, 1.06), respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) for the AUC(∞) of sitagliptin 50 mg and metformin 1000 mg (part II) were 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) and 1.00 (0.94, 1.07), respectively, and for the C(max) of sitagliptin and metformin were 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) and 1.01 (0.93, 1.10), respectively. In both part I and part II, the 90% CIs of the GMRs of the AUC(∞) and C(max) for both sitagliptin and metformin all fell within the pre-specified bioequivalence bounds of (0.80, 1.25). Administration of single doses of sitagliptin/metformin 50 mg/500 mg (part I) and 50 mg/1000 mg FDC tablets (part II) and co-administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as individual tablets were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The sitagliptin/metformin 50 mg/500 mg and 50 mg/1000 mg FDC tablets are bioequivalent to co-administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as individual tablets and support bioequivalence to the sitagliptin/metformin 50 mg/850 mg tablet strength. These results indicate that the safety and efficacy profile of co-administration of sitagliptin and metformin can be extended to the sitagliptin/metformin FDC tablets.

Effect of moderate hepatic insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin.

BACKGROUND: Sitagliptin is a highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. Sitagliptin is primarily excreted by renal elimination as unchanged drug, with only a small percentage (approximately 16%) undergoing hepatic metabolism. OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of moderate hepatic insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin. METHODS: In an open-label study, a single 100-mg oral dose of sitagliptin was administered to 10 male or female patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh's scores ranged from 7 to 9) and 10 healthy control subjects matched to each patient for race, gender, age (+/- 5 yrs) and body mass index (BMI kg/m2 +/- 5%). After administration of each dose, blood and urine samples were collected to assess sitagliptin pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: The mean AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax for sitagliptin were numerically, but not significantly (p>0.050), higher in patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency compared with healthy matched control subjects by 21% and 13%, respectively. These slight differences were also not considered to be clinically meaningful. Moderate hepatic insufficiency had no statistically significant effect on the Tmax, apparent terminal t(1/2), fraction of the oral dose excreted into urine (f(e,0-infinity)) and renal clearance (ClR) (p>0.100) of sitagliptin. Sitagliptin was generally well tolerated by both patients and subjects; all adverse experiences were transient and rated as mild in intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate hepatic insufficiency has no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin.

Potential for interactions between caspofungin and nelfinavir or rifampin.

The potential for interactions between caspofungin and nelfinavir or rifampin was evaluated in two parallel-panel studies. In study A, healthy subjects received a 14-day course of caspofungin alone (50 mg administered intravenously [IV] once daily) (n = 10) or with nelfinavir (1,250 mg administered orally twice daily) (n = 9) or rifampin (600 mg administered orally once daily) (n = 10). In study B, 14 subjects received a 28-day course of rifampin (600 mg administered orally once daily), with caspofungin (50 mg administered IV once daily) coadministered on the last 14 days, and 12 subjects received a 14-day course of caspofungin alone (50 mg administered IV once daily). The coadministration/administration alone geometric mean ratio for the caspofungin area under the time-concentration profile calculated for the 24-h period following dosing [AUC(0-24)] was as follows (values in parentheses are 90% confidence intervals [CIs]): 1.08 (0.93-1.26) for nelfinavir, 1.12 (0.97-1.30) for rifampin (study A), and 1.01 (0.91-1.11) for rifampin (study B). The shape of the caspofungin plasma profile was altered by rifampin, resulting in a 14 to 31% reduction in the trough concentration at 24 h after dosing (C(24h)), consistent with a net induction effect at steady state. Both the AUC and the C(24h) were elevated in the initial days of rifampin coadministration in study A (61 and 170% elevations, respectively, on day 1) but not in study B, consistent with transient net inhibition prior to full induction. The coadministration/administration alone geometric mean ratio for the rifampin AUC(0-24) on day 14 was 1.07 (90% CI, 0.83-1.38). Nelfinavir does not meaningfully alter caspofungin pharmacokinetics. Rifampin both inhibits and induces caspofungin disposition, resulting in a reduced C(24h) at steady state. An increase in the caspofungin dose to 70 mg, administered daily, should be considered when the drug is coadministered with rifampin.

Disposition of caspofungin: role of distribution in determining pharmacokinetics in plasma.

The disposition of caspofungin, a parenteral antifungal drug, was investigated. Following a single, 1-h, intravenous infusion of 70 mg (200 microCi) of [(3)H]caspofungin to healthy men, plasma, urine, and feces were collected over 27 days in study A (n = 6) and plasma was collected over 26 weeks in study B (n = 7). Supportive data were obtained from a single-dose [(3)H]caspofungin tissue distribution study in rats (n = 3 animals/time point). Over 27 days in humans, 75.4% of radioactivity was recovered in urine (40.7%) and feces (34.4%). A long terminal phase (t(1/2) = 14.6 days) characterized much of the plasma drug profile of radioactivity, which remained quantifiable to 22.3 weeks. Mass balance calculations indicated that radioactivity in tissues peaked at 1.5 to 2 days at approximately 92% of the dose, and the rate of radioactivity excretion peaked at 6 to 7 days. Metabolism and excretion of caspofungin were very slow processes, and very little excretion or biotransformation occurred in the first 24 to 30 h postdose. Most of the area under the concentration-time curve of caspofungin was accounted for during this period, consistent with distribution-controlled clearance. The apparent distribution volume during this period indicated that this distribution process is uptake into tissue cells. Radioactivity was widely distributed in rats, with the highest concentrations in liver, kidney, lung, and spleen. Liver exhibited an extended uptake phase, peaking at 24 h with 35% of total dose in liver. The plasma profile of caspofungin is determined primarily by the rate of distribution of caspofungin from plasma into tissues.