Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Mens Health ; 13(3): 1557988319846404, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046582

ABSTRACT

The case of a male patient is reported, who presented with renal carcinoma and tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava (IVC) extending from the right atrium (RA) to the bifurcation of IVC, common and external right iliac vein thrombosis, common and deep right femoral vein thrombosis, right popliteal vein thrombosis, with pulmonary and hepatic metastasis, treated with sorafenib. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the most common form of kidney cancer, occurs in 90% of cases and is nearly twice as common in men as in women. The diagnosis of RCC is accompanied by intravascular tumor thrombus in 10% of cases, and further extension of the tumor reaching RA is detected in approximately 1% of all patients. Therapy for advanced renal cell cancer has evolved considerably in the past decade, with new agents greeted like "buried treasure." Before 2005, the widely used systemic agents were cytokine interferon alfa and interleukin-2, which yielded modest efficacy and substantial toxicity. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) increase progression-free survival and/or overall survival as both first-line and second-line treatments for metastatic RCC. Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with activity against Raf-1 serine/threonine kinase, B-Raf, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT-3), and c-KIT.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Heart Atria/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Vena Cava, Inferior/pathology , Venous Thrombosis/pathology , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Femoral Vein/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Vein/pathology , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Iliac Vein/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Vein/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Popliteal Vein/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Vein/pathology , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Vena Cava, Inferior/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging
3.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 18(2): 189-95, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19565050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical therapy remains the most effective treatment modality in gastric cancer. The importance of multimodal treatment for advanced gastric cancer has contributed to the development of more accurate preoperative staging strategies. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy (SL) for abdominal metastases and the predictive value of SL for tumor resectability. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a prospective, cohort, observational study of 98 patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma admitted at a tertiary referral hospital over a three year period. Extended SL, laparoscopic ultrasonography and peritoneal cytology were performed in 45 patients with gastric cancer without distant metastases on pre-therapeutic imaging staging. Of the 45 patients, 17 (37.8%) had distant metastases on SL and were offered palliative therapy and/or supportive care. Open laparotomy and gastrectomy was performed in the patients without distant metastases or with uncertain resectability on SL. RESULTS: An unnecessary laparotomy was avoided in 17 (37.8%) patients. The overall SL sensitivity for distant metastases was 89%, specificity 100% and diagnostic accuracy 95.5%. The sensitivity for lymph node metastases was 54.5%, the specificity 100% and the diagnostic accuracy 64.3%. The SL positive predictive value for resectability was 96% and the negative predictive value was 50%. The morbidity of SL was 2.2% and the mortality 0. CONCLUSION: Staging laparoscopy is a safe and effective staging modality in patients with gastric carcinoma. It avoids unnecessary laparotomies in a significant number of patients and should be mandatory if neoadjuvant treatment is planned.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Laparoscopy , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Cytodiagnosis , Endosonography , Gastrectomy , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Palliative Care , Patient Selection , Positron-Emission Tomography , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Romania , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Unnecessary Procedures
4.
Cancer Biother Radiopharm ; 18(1): 27-34, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12667306

ABSTRACT

There is still no therapy method in the colorectal cancers that is good enough for such a complex disease. Combined surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy improved survival, but the side effects and the poor performance status of the patients seriously affect the use of these methods. We used a therapeutical approach of surgery and chemotherapy combined with biotherapy by Viscum album extract Isorel, aiming to improve the patients' resistance to the disease and to render the treatment's side effects more tolerable. Isorel is aqueous extract well known for its anticancer effects obtained by various in vitro and in vivo experimental models and which was validated by an in vitro bioassay on murine melanoma B16F10 and human cervical carcinoma HeLa cells. Isorel strongly reduced human colon cancer HT 29 cell line growth in vitro in the MTT bioassay. Hence, it was further used in a prospective, randomized, and controlled study which compared the postoperative results for patients with colorectal cancer stages Dukes C (40 patients) and D (24 patients) who, beside surgery, received either only chemotherapy (5-FU), 6 cycles (either the Mayo or the De Gramont protocol) or chemotherapy combined with Isorel biotherapy. These 64 patients were randomly allocated into three groups "only chemotherapy" for 21 cases, chemo + biotherapy for 29 cases and 14 patients underwent only surgery as the control group. We noted no toxic deaths due to either chemo or biotherapy. The patients operated on and treated with chemo and biotherapy had median survival significantly better and a cumulative proportion survival (Kaplan-Maier) superior to those of the patients receiving only postoperative chemotherapy. Thus, colorectal cancer patients seem to benefit in terms of survival from combined postoperative chemotherapy and Isorel biotherapy, either adjuvant or palliative.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phytotherapy , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mistletoe , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...