ABSTRACT
Breast cancer is the leading cause of neoplasia-related deaths among women, but no data are available in the literature on the safe use of oncological treatments in glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD)-deficient patients. This case report describes, for the first time, the treatment of a G6PD-deficient woman diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent adjuvant treatment after quadrantectomy and axillary node dissection. After conservative surgery, many patients require adjuvant treatment with hormone therapy (HT) and/or chemotherapy. Anthracyclines are considered a cornerstone in this setting but, because of their oxidative properties, are contraindicated in G6PD-deficient patients. Despite the absence of data in the literature on their use in G6PD-deficient patients, we chose to use docetaxel and cyclophosphamide because these agents were not predicted to elicit oxidative stress. The patient completed six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, and no adverse reactions were observed. Tamoxifen was excluded as a HT as a nonoxidative agent was required; therefore, an aromatase inhibitor was used as adjuvant therapy. Considering the high frequency of breast cancer and G6PD deficiency worldwide, there are little data available in the literature on the oxidative properties of oncological drugs. The oncological community must report cases in which patients with hereditary enzymatic deficiencies are treated successfully with anticancer agents. This would enable clinicians to have access to data that would be very useful in the choice of a safe treatment program.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency/complications , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Docetaxel , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Letrozole , Middle Aged , Nitriles/administration & dosage , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Triazoles/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assessing the quality of care and service delivery through the analysis of ad hoc indicators is a relevant process for quality monitoring and improvement with a view to providing patients, the community and administrators alike with appropriate elements of evaluation. This paper describes the key results of a certification process based on the Joint Commission International (JCI) criteria for the home hospitalisation model implemented by the palliative care units of seven Milan hospitals for terminally ill patients with cancer. METHODS: In 2006, the interhospital working team implemented a certification project based on the JCI Disease or Condition-Specific Care (DSCS) programme. Thirty standards subdivided into five functional areas with 150 measurable elements were the starting-point for periodic improvement plans within and across participating hospitals. Programme compliance was analysed in terms of annual performance improvement and consistency across the seven PCUs involved in achieving set goals. The JCI standards were applied on 3316 terminally ill patients with cancer treated at home from 2005 to 2009. RESULTS: As a result of the work carried out, the JCI survey conducted 3 years after project implementation demonstrated full compliance with the established standards, leading to the JCI certification award (for the first time in this clinical setting internationally). CONCLUSION: The work carried out with a view to certification has confirmed the possibility that facilities spread across different hospitals can actually share common processes and standardise the activities for the care of end-of-life patients with cancer at home as if they were one single service provider.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assessing the quality of care and service delivery through the analysis of ad hoc indicators is a relevant process for quality monitoring and improvement with a view to providing patients, the community and administrators alike with appropriate elements of evaluation. This paper describes the key results of a certification process based on the Joint Commission International (JCI) criteria for the home hospitalisation model implemented by the palliative care units of seven Milan hospitals for terminally ill patients with cancer. METHODS: In 2006, the interhospital working team implemented a certification project based on the JCI Disease or Condition-Specific Care (DSCS) programme. Thirty standards subdivided into five functional areas with 150 measurable elements were the starting-point for periodic improvement plans within and across participating hospitals. Programme compliance was analysed in terms of annual performance improvement and consistency across the seven PCUs involved in achieving set goals. The JCI standards were applied on 3316 terminally ill patients with cancer treated at home from 2005 to 2009. RESULTS: As a result of the work carried out, the JCI survey conducted 3 years after project implementation demonstrated full compliance with the established standards, leading to the JCI certification award (for the first time in this clinical setting internationally). CONCLUSION: The work carried out with a view to certification has confirmed the possibility that facilities spread across different hospitals can actually share common processes and standardise the activities for the care of end-of-life patients with cancer at home as if they were one single service provider.
Subject(s)
Home Care Services/organization & administration , Hospitals, Urban/organization & administration , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Certification , Child , Female , Guideline Adherence , Home Care Services/standards , Hospitals, Urban/standards , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Quality of Health Care/standards , Terminally Ill , Young AdultABSTRACT
GOALS OF THE WORK: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a severe complication of bisphosphonates treatment. Bisphosphonates reduce skeletal adverse events and give a clinical benefit to cancer patients. Therefore, it is necessary to identify appropriate procedures to reduce ONJ injures by using a successful monitoring program. In a retrospective study we analyzed the impact of a prevention program based on clinical oral cavity examination, dentists, and patients' education. The aim of the study was to evaluate if this approach might improve ONJ outcome in patients receiving pamidronate or zoledronate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively two different groups of patients treated at our Institution: patients treated from October 2003 to June 2005 (group A) and patients treated from June 2005 to April 2007 (group B). In June 2005 the prevention program started for all our patients. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-six cancer patients with bone involvement, treated with bisphosphonates, were considered. Sixteen of them developed ONJ: eight before and eight after June 2005. We observed a consistent difference in the evolution of the two groups. In the first group, four patients underwent a major surgery (one partial maxillectomy, complicated by septic shock and oronasal communication; two partial mandibulectomies; and one segmental mandibular resection), with an important impairment of their quality of life; while the eight new ONJ cases, diagnosed after June 2005, were successfully treated without aggressive dental interventions, and achieved a good control of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonates-related ONJ is a frequent adverse event (8.6%). The monitoring program proved very efficient to improve the clinical outcome of ONJ, avoiding an aggressive treatment and using a conservative approach and medical therapy.
