Fulminant Clostridium perfringens Sepsis in Kidney Transplant: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Infections, particularly urinary tract infections, and cardiovascular accidents are the main causes of morbidity and mortality during the 1st year after kidney transplantation (KT). Bacteria and viruses, such as Escherichia coli, Enteroccoci, and Polyoma BK virus are common in the 1st 6 months, so they are controlled routinely. On the other hand, Clostridium perfringens infection is a rare life-threatening condition, associated with a high mortality rate especially in the transplant population, that is not controlled routinely. CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man with end-stage renal disease secondary to hypertension and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis underwent living-related KT. He recovered well and was discharged 11 days after KT. Two weeks after his discharge, he presented with severe abdominal pain, fever, and vomiting. Radiologic assessment showed pneumoperitoneum. Urgent exploratory laparotomy revealed significant amount of gas and no bowel perforation. However, right retroperitoneal gas collection was noted and drained. Blood culture was positive for C perfringens. Patient died after 48 hours, with signs of multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Clostridium perfringens sepsis is severe and usually lethal in the transplant population. Prevention is difficult because the origin of the infection is unclear. Keeping high suspicion in patients with sudden and unexplained septic shock and aggressive surgical and medical treatment are fundamental.

Initial experience with robot-assisted nephrectomy for living-donor kidney transplantation: feasibility and technical notes.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted surgery provide endowrist instruments and 3-dimensional visualization of the operative field that are improvements over traditional laparoscopy. The few research studies published so far have demonstrated that living-donor nephrectomy using the robot-assisted technique is safe and feasible, providing advantages for patients. METHODS: Since November 2009, we performed 20 robot-assisted living-donor nephrectomies. Eight patients underwent hand-assisted robotic nephrectomy, whereas 20, totally robotic nephrectomy. RESULTS: Median intraoperative bleeding was 174 mL (range, 10-750) but no patient needed intraoperative transfusion with blood cells. The median warm ischemia time was 3.16 minutes (range, 0.30-6.5). there was no case of conversion to an open procedure. The median operative time was 311 minutes (range, 85-530); the median console time was 160 minutes (range, 135-220). CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted living-donor kidney recovery was a safe and effective procedure. The totally robotic recovery is an evolving technique. The prospect of robotic staplers, endowrist ligature, and robotic single port may further increase these advantages.

Living-donor liver transplantation: donor selection criteria and postoperative outcomes. A single-center experience with a 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Donor safety must be considered to be a priority in live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate these outcomes with special attention to surgical complications and their treatment. METHODS: From March 2001 to March 2012, 80 live donors underwent right hepatectomy (5-8 segments). The middle hepatic vein was always left in the donor. Our retrospective study analyzed surgical outcomes and complications according to the Clavien classification modified for live donors. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 63.2 ± 12.6 months, the mortality was 0%. Two donors experienced intraoperative complications, but all of them had complete recovery there after. Among the 22 complications in 17 donors (21.2%), 7 (8.7%) were major complications (Clavien grade 2b) but only 2 donors required surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: LDLT is a safe and feasible modality to alleviate the cadaveric donor shortage. The efficacy of this procedure is similar to that with deceased donors.

Colorectal liver metastases: hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatectomy reduces the incidence of tumor recurrence in selected patients. Case-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) during Liver Resection (LR) is a vascular procedure designed to prevent bleeding from the liver during hepatectomy. Outgrowth of pre-existing colorectal micrometastases may occur 5-6 times faster in occluded liver lobes than in non-occluded lobes. We conducted a case-matched analysis at our Institution to assess the effects of HPC on overall and recurrence-free survival in highly selected patients, who underwent LR due to Colorectal liver metastases (CLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2010, 120 patients operated for CLM were included into this case-matched study. Patients were allocated to two groups: Group-A patients who underwent HPC during LR; Group-B patients who underwent LR without HPC. RESULTS: HPC during liver resection was associated with better overall patient 5-year survival (47.2% in Group-A and 32.1% in Group-B) (P-value = 0.06), and significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival (49.9% in Group-A vs 18.3% in Group-B) (P-value = 0.010) The Cox regression model identified the following risk factors for worse prognosis in terms of shorter recurrence-free survival and higher incidence of tumor recurrence: no HPC (Group-B) (P-value = 0.032) and positive lymph nodes at the time of LR (P-value = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Lack of HPC in selected patients who underwent LR for CLM results to be a strong independent risk factor for higher patient exposure to tumor recurrence. We suggest that hepatic hilum clamping should be seriously taken into consideration in this patient setting. MINI-ABSTRACT: A case-matched study was performed in 120 patients undergoing liver resection due to colorectal liver metastases, comparing patients who received intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) with those who did not. The 5-year overall survival rate was similar, but the 5-year recurrence-free rate was significantly higher with no HPC (p = 0.012).

The first report of orthotopic liver transplantation in the Western world.

Until the present time, the first experimental liver transplant which led to the development of human liver transplantation is attributed to C. Stuart Welch who performed a heterotopic transplant in the canine species in 1955. In 1956, Jack Cannon is credited with the first animal orthotopic liver transplant although the species was not disclosed. This report is intended to set the historical record straight by acknowledging that Vittorio Staudacher in 1952 was the first to perform a liver transplant in a large animal model.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in unrelated viral cirrhosis: long-term results after liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic viral hepatitis is considered to be the most significant risk factor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, about 5%-15% of HCC occur in noncirrhotic or virus-unrelated cirrhotic patients. The natural history of HCC in terms of incidence, clinical features, and tumor progression differs according to the underlying cancerogenic factors and differences in hepatocarcinogenetic pathways. Little is know about the relationship between HCC outcomes after liver transplantation (OLT) and the primary liver disease. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients transplanted due to HCC in settings of either virus-related or virus-unrelated cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2007, 179 patients underwent OLT due to HCC: 157 (87.8%) affected by virus-related (group A) and 22 (12.2%) virus-unrelated cirrhosis (group B). We analyzed patient characteristics including demographics, tumor features, downstaging treatments, and recurrences. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 41.2 months, the 3- and 5-year overall long-term survivals between group A versus group B were 81% versus 75% and 85% versus 78.4% respectively (P = NS). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survivals between group A versus group B were 90.8% versus 89.6% and 85.6% versus 85.6%, respectively (P = NS). After OLT, HCC recurrences occurred in 14 group A (14/157, 8.9%) and 4 patients (4/22, 18.1%) group B subjects. DISCUSSION: Our data demonstrated that after OLT, HCC outcomes were not different between patients with virus-related or -unrelated cirrhosis. The direct oncogenetic role played by hepatitis B and C appear to not be associated with a greater risk to develop HCC recurrence.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results compared with deceased donor liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may represent a valid therapeutic option allowing several advantages for patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, some reports in the literature have demonstrated worse long-term and disease-free survivals among patients treated by LDLT than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for HCC. Herein we have reported our long-term results comparing LDLT with DDLT for HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 179 patients who underwent OLT from January 2000 to December 2007, 25 (13.9%) received LDLT with HCC 154 (86.1%) received DDLT. Patients were selected based on the Milan criteria. Transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous alcoholization, or liver resection was applied as a downstaging procedure while on the waiting list. Patients with stage II HCC were proposed for LDLT. RESULTS: The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 77.3% and 68.7% versus 82.8% and 76.7% for LDLT and DDLT recipients, respectively, with no significant difference by the log-rank test. Moreover, the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 95.5% and 95.5% (LDLT) versus 90.5% and 89.4% (DDLT; P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: LDLT guarantees the same long-term results as DDLT where there are analogous selection criteria for candidates. The Milan criteria remain a valid tool to select candidates for LDLT to achieve optimal long-term results.

Liver adenomatosis: a rare indication for living donor liver transplantation.

Liver adenomatosis (LA) is a rare benign disease of the liver with unclear pathogenesis, which is characterized by multiple hepatic adenomas. The management of LA remains controversial. Herein we have reported a case of LA treated by living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A 48-year-old woman developed multiple liver adenomas. In view of the sizes and localizations of the lesions, the patient underwent right hepatic resection and segment II nodulectomy. Thirty-four months later, she developed recurrence of multiple hepatic adenomas and 2 nodules were highly suspect for hepatocellular carcinoma. Re-resection was not indicated due to the whole liver being involved with adenomas. The patient underwent LDLT. At 45 months thereafter she is alive and disease-free. In conclusion, LDLT is indicated in cases of nonresectability; it may offer optimal results in view of the absence of portal hypertension and the elimination of waiting list time.

Adult living donor liver transplantation with right lobe graft: the venous outflow management in the Milan-Niguarda experience.

In right lobe living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT), reconstruction of middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries is often necessary to avoid severe graft congestion. From March 2001, we performed 36 right lobe ALDLT (segments 5, 6, 7, and 8) without MHV and one pediatric transplant (segments 2 and 3). In the presence of MHV tributaries larger than 5 mm, we intraoperatively evaluated the need for reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 848 days (range=8-2412), 33/37 transplanted patients are alive with overall patient and graft survivals of 89.2% and 83.8%, respectively. Large MHV tributaries (>5 mm) were present in 10 cases, and inferior right hepatic veins (IRHV) draining segment 6 in 11 cases. In 10 cases, we performed an end-to-side anastomosis between the IRHV and the side of the recipient vena cava. In three cases, the MHV tributaries were end-to-end anastomosed to the stump of the recipient MHV. In all other cases, the vein tributaries were not reconstructed. A computed tomography scan performed from 1 to 3 months after surgery did not show any congested area in the liver parenchyma. In our experience, reconstruction of the MHV tributaries was not always necessary when graft-to-recipient weight ratio is >0.8. Pre- and intraoperative evaluation of the segmental branches of the hepatic vein is crucial to decide about reconstructing these collaterals. Anastomosis of V5 or V8 to the stump of the recipient MHV reduces the number of vascular anastomosis and maintains a physiological angle between these collaterals and the caval vein.