Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(17)2022 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36077164

ABSTRACT

Body mass index (BMI) has been suggested to play an important role in the relationship between the APOLIPOPROTEIN (APO)E genotype and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Using data from the BODYCON cross-sectional study (n = 360 adults) we assessed the association between body composition and CVD risk markers according to APOE genotype, with examination of the role of BMI. In this study cohort, the APOE2/E3 group had lower fasting blood lipids than APOE4 carriers and APOE3/E3 group (p ≤ 0.01). After stratifying the group according to BMI, APOE4 carriers in the normal BMI subgroup had a higher lean mass compared with the APOE3/E3 group (p = 0.02) whereas in the overweight/obese subgroup, the android to gynoid percentage fat ratio was lower in APOE4 carriers than APOE3/E3 group (p = 0.04). Fasting lipid concentrations were only different between the APOE2/E3 and other genotype groups within the normal weight BMI subgroup (p ≤ 0.04). This finding was associated with a lower dietary fibre and a higher trans-fat intake compared with APOE4 carriers, and a lower carbohydrate intake relative to the APOE3/E3 group. Our results confirm previous reports that BMI modulates the effect of APOE on CVD risk markers and suggest novel interactions on body composition, with diet a potential modulator of this relationship.


Subject(s)
Apolipoprotein E4 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Adult , Apolipoprotein E2 , Apolipoprotein E3/genetics , Apolipoprotein E4/genetics , Apolipoproteins E/genetics , Biomarkers , Body Composition , Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases/genetics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Genotype , Humans
2.
Nutr Metab (Lond) ; 19(1): 15, 2022 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35241101

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diets high in saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and greater abdominal obesity are both associated with raised low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations, an independent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk marker. Although reducing SFA intake is a public health strategy for CVD prevention, the role of body fat distribution on the relationship between SFA and LDL-C is unclear. Therefore, our objective was to investigate whether the association between dietary SFAs and LDL-C concentrations is related to body composition. METHODS: In the BODYCON (impact of physiological and lifestyle factors on body composition) study, 409 adults [mean age 42 ± 16 years and median BMI of 23.5 (21.5-25.9) kg/m2] underwent a measure of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, assessment of habitual dietary intake using a 4-day weighed food diary and physical activity level using a tri-axial accelerometer. Blood pressure was measured, and a fasting blood sample was collected to determine cardiometabolic disease risk markers. Correlations between body composition, circulating risk markers and dietary macronutrients were assessed prior to multivariate regression analysis. The effect of increasing intakes of dietary SFA on outcome measures was assessed using ANCOVA after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass was moderately positively correlated with total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure and HOMA-IR (rs = 0.25-0.44, p < 0.01). In multiple regression analysis, 18.3% of the variability in LDL-C was explained by SFA intake [% total energy (TE)], abdominal VAT mass, carbohydrate%TE and fat%TE intakes. When data were stratified according to increasing SFA%TE intakes, fasting TC, LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were higher in Q4 compared with Q2 (p ≤ 0.03). SBP was higher in Q4 versus Q3 (p = 0.01). Android lean mass was also higher in Q3 versus Q1 (p = 0.02). Other anthropometric and CVD risk markers were not different across quartile groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although dietary SFA was found to explain 9% of the variability in LDL-C, stratification of data according to quartiles of SFA intake did not reveal a dose-dependent relationship with LDL-C concentration. Furthermore, this association appeared to be independent of abdominal obesity in this cohort. Clinical Trail registration: Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02658539. Registered 20 January 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02658539 .

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...