Transfusion in Root Replacement for Aortic Dissection: The STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion in acute aortic syndromes has been studied in a limited fashion. We sought to describe contemporary transfusion practice for root replacement in acute (Stanford) type A aortic dissection. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was interrogated to identify patients who underwent primary aortic root replacement for acute (Stanford) type A aortic dissection (July 2014 to June 2017). Patients (n = 1558) were stratified by type of root replacement. Multivariate regression was used to determine those variables associated with transfusion and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Transfusion was required in 90.5% of cases (n = 1410). Operative mortality for all patients was 17.3% (261 deaths). Intraoperative red blood cell transfusion portended reduced short-term survival (odds ratio [OR] 2.00, P = .025). Massive postoperative transfusion was associated with prolonged ventilation (OR 13.47, P < .001), sepsis (OR 4.13, P < .001), and new dialysis-dependent renal failure (OR 2.43, P < .001). Women were more likely to require transfusion (OR 3.03, P < .001), as were patients who had coronary artery bypass (OR 1.57, P = .009), and those in shock (OR 2.27, P < .001). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement was associated with reduced transfusion requirements vs composite roots. Institutional case volume was not appreciably correlated with transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients undergoing root replacement for aortic dissection require blood products. Composite root replacement is associated with a greater likelihood of transfusion than a valve-sparing operation. Transfusion independently foreshadows greater operative mortality.

The use of innominate artery cannulation for antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Direct cannulation of the innominate artery for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion has been shown to be safe in elective proximal aortic reconstructions. We sought to evaluate the safety of this technique in acute aortic dissection. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective review was undertaken of patients who underwent proximal aortic reconstruction for Stanford type A dissection between 2006 and 2016. Those patients who had direct innominate artery cannulation for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients underwent innominate artery cannulation for ACP for Stanford Type A Dissections. Isolated replacement of the ascending aorta was performed in 36 patients (48.0%), concomitant aortic root replacement was required in 35 patients (46.7%), of whom 7 had a valve-sparing aortic root replacement, ascending aorta and arch replacement was required in 4 patients (5%). Other procedures included frozen elephant trunk (n = 11 (14.7%)), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 20 (26.7%)), and peripheral arterial bypass (n = 4 (5.3%)). Mean hypothermic circulatory arrest time was 19 ± 13 min. Thirty-day mortality was 14.7% (n = 11). Perioperative stroke occurred in 7 patients (9.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first comprehensive review of direct innominate artery cannulation through median sternotomy for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic dissection. Our experience suggests that this strategy is a safe and effective technique compared to other reported methods of cannulation and cerebral protection for delivering selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in these cases.

Transfusion in Elective Aortic Root Replacement: Analysis of the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

BACKGROUND: Data on blood use in proximal aortic surgery is limited. This study sought to establish quality benchmarks in the pattern of transfusion during elective aortic root replacement. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was queried to identify all patients who underwent primary elective aortic root replacement between July 2014 and June 2017. Multivariable negative binomial regressions were used to determine whether perioperative transfusion was associated with demographic or procedural factors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 5559 patients analyzed, 38.95% (n = 2165) received no blood products. Patients who had a valve-sparing root replacement were less likely to undergo transfusion than those who received composite roots (bioprosthetic or mechanical valves) or homografts. The 30-day mortality for all patients was 2.57% (n = 143). Transfusion was associated with an increased risk of death at 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.833; P = .012), more frequent reoperation for bleeding (OR, 1.766; P < .001), prolonged ventilation (OR, 1.935; P < .001), a longer postoperative hospital stay (OR, 1.056; P < .001), and a higher incidence of new dialysis-dependent renal failure (OR, 2.088; P = .003). There was no correlation between institutional case volume and transfusion practice. CONCLUSIONS: Elective aortic root replacement can be performed with acceptable requirements for blood products. Composite root replacement has a greater likelihood of transfusion than does a valve-sparing procedure. Transfusion is independently associated with more complications after elective aortic root surgery, including 30-day mortality.