ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Qualitative studies have elucidated cancer survivors' experiences of cognitive changes associated with cancer and cancer treatment. This study specifically explored experiences of women treated for breast cancer who were seeking cognitive rehabilitation. The objective was to characterise the frequency and nature of cognitive changes and adaptations to cognitive change reported by these participants to better understand treatment needs of this group. METHOD: Australian women who had completed primary treatments for breast cancer (surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy) and volunteered to participate in one of two cognitive rehabilitation intervention studies were interviewed via telephone. Interview responses regarding cognitive changes and adaptations to cognitive change were transcribed by the interviewers, then coded and analysed by two researchers using content analysis. RESULTS: Among the 95 participants (age M=54.3 years, SD=9.6), the most commonly reported cognitive change was memory (79% of participants) and 61% reported more than one type of cognitive change. Adaptations to change were reported by 87% of participants, with written or electronic cues the most common (51%). Most often, participants reported using a single type of adaptation (48%) with only 39% reporting multiple types of adaptations. CONCLUSIONS: Women treated for breast cancer, who were seeking cognitive rehabilitation, most commonly reported memory changes, which were mainly managed through a single type of adaptation. These results suggest that there is considerable scope for increasing the range of cognitive adaptations to improve the quality of life of cancer survivors who experience adverse cognitive changes.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Australia , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Cognition , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Low engagement and high attrition are common challenges in web-based interventions. Typical measures of engagement reported in the literature are not meaningful for describing participant activity within the intervention and can be misleading. This research aimed to develop a more meaningful method of measuring engagement in an online cognitive rehabilitation program whilst monitoring treatment fidelity. METHODS: A pilot study and randomised controlled trial (RCT) were conducted. Data from 60 participants were analysed from three intervention groups: pilot cancer group, pilot non-cancer group and RCT cancer group. Groups completed the 4-week eReCog program comprised of four online modules. Engagement scores were calculated based on activities completed in each module. Attrition, interaction with the program facilitator and correlations with outcome measures were analysed. RESULTS: Overall engagement in the intervention was high. The non-cancer group participated significantly less than the cancer groups (p = < 0.001), whereby the percentage of activity items completed was 92, 87 and 78% in the pilot cancer, RCT cancer and pilot non-cancer groups, respectively. Attrition was higher in the pilot non-cancer group (24%) compared to the pilot cancer group (8%) and the RCT cancer group (16%). Total engagement was correlated with fewer prospective memory problems on instrumental activities of daily living (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring completed activities in online interventions appears a more meaningful measure of engagement than other conventional methods described in the literature and has the potential to increase treatment fidelity in web-based research.
Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cognition/physiology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Patient Participation/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive dysfunction associated with cancer is frequently reported and can reduce quality of life. This study evaluated a Web-based cognitive rehabilitation therapy program (eReCog) in cancer survivors compared with a waitlist control group. METHODS: Adult cancer survivors with self-reported cognitive symptoms who had completed primary treatment at least 6 months prior were recruited. Participants completed telephone screening and were randomly allocated to the 4-week online intervention or waitlist. Primary outcome was perceived cognitive impairment assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function version 3. Secondary outcomes were additional measures of subjective cognitive functioning, objective cognitive functioning, and psychosocial variables. RESULTS: Seventy-six women were allocated to the intervention (n = 40) or waitlist (n = 36). A significant interaction was found on the instrumental activities of daily living measure of self-reported prospective memory whereby the intervention group reported a greater reduction in prospective memory failures than the waitlist group. Interaction trends were noted on perceived cognitive impairments (P = .089) and executive functioning (P = .074). No significant interactions were observed on other measures of objective cognitive functioning or psychosocial variables. CONCLUSIONS: The Web-based intervention shows promise for improving self-reported cognitive functioning in adult cancer survivors. Further research is warranted to better understand the mechanisms by which the intervention might contribute to improved self-reported cognition.
